Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They get to make the final choice. It is in her interest it is an informed choice. Can't do that without an ultrasound.And we expect a ultrasound first. Perfect compromise and fair to the baby whose life may be terminated.Point well taken. More hypocrisy of the left. That's shy when we talke back power, we implement these regulation regardless of what they want.
Nope. Hypocrisy is saying one thing but thinking something else. I say that women should have the right to make their own reproductive choices. And I think the exact same thing.
A perfect comprimise would be leaving medical decisions to the woman and her doctor. Not forcing non-necessary medical procedures on women because you don't like that they get to make the choice for themselves.
Forcing a woman to undergo a medically unnecessary procedure has nothing to do with 'medical safety'. Forcing a woman to look at an ultrasound has nothing to do with 'medical safety'.
It has everything to do with harassing and humiliating women.
Do you advocate that anyone killing those two cells go to prison?Wrong.
An embryo/fetus is not a 'baby.'
Yes, it is life. You're wrong
in your view. life exists on a continuum from two cells to birth. you don't get to decide what that is.
the ONLY question is when the governmental interest exceeds our own
and that's been settled for a long time.
notwithstanding yet another fraudulent article in life news.
It's a scientific fact that from 2 cells to birth that's an individual human being, unique in all respects and genetically complete from the moment of conception.
Have a problem with that? Argue with the sciences of Genetics, Taxonomy, Human Physiology, Biology, etc.
A is A.
You want to send 17 year old girls to prison?
Do you support sending people to prison who knowingly kill a human being?
Scientific fact....human being, separate and unique in all aspects. Not being disputed if you'll notice by anyone, as it's indisputable. A is A.
More accurately, I want medical decisions to be left up to the woman and her doctor. Not some fat old white guy in a legislature who thinks he knows better than both.
Killing an innocent human being in cold blood is not a “medical decision”.
Choosing one's own reproduction is a medical decision. And a woman has the right to deny her body to anyone. Or anything.
They get to make the final choice. It is in her interest it is an informed choice. Can't do that without an ultrasound.And we expect a ultrasound first. Perfect compromise and fair to the baby whose life may be terminated.Nope. Hypocrisy is saying one thing but thinking something else. I say that women should have the right to make their own reproductive choices. And I think the exact same thing.
A perfect comprimise would be leaving medical decisions to the woman and her doctor. Not forcing non-necessary medical procedures on women because you don't like that they get to make the choice for themselves.
Forcing a woman to undergo a medically unnecessary procedure has nothing to do with 'medical safety'. Forcing a woman to look at an ultrasound has nothing to do with 'medical safety'.
It has everything to do with harassing and humiliating women.
It has everything to do with understanding what the choice is. I agree in that it's an unnecessary procedure and should not be performed.
More accurately, I want medical decisions to be left up to the woman and her doctor. Not some fat old white guy in a legislature who thinks he knows better than both.
Killing an innocent human being in cold blood is not a “medical decision”.
Choosing one's own reproduction is a medical decision. And a woman has the right to deny her body to anyone. Or anything.
Don't have sex. Easy decision, involves only her save cases where she's forced which are crimes and not what's being discussed in 99.99% of all abortions.
And by 'pay for other people's fuck ups'.....you mean feed hungry children?You're the batshit crazy one rightwinger being against people who don't want to pay for yours and others fuckups.If you can't afford kids, don't have them. Get out of my wallet. If you can't feed your own kids, don't have them. If you have them and can't feed them, either find some bleeding heart, good luck, or do without, tough shit.
so you force someone to have a kid they can't afford? and then say screw them let them live in poverty, wacko?
how about we stop paying for your viagra.
again, radial religious rightwing men should get out of women's business. you wackos haven't been able to tolerate, since the '60's, women not needing you to make their decisions for them... not need men to control them, not need men to own them by not letting women control their own bodies
make your own decisions.
btw, you're disgusting and immoral. what did women do to you that you hate them so much?
or is it that men aren't allowed to beat women into submission anymore that you resent?
Anyone that would allow a woman to make a choice then demand someone else pay for it is disgusting and immoral.
I love women. I hate irresponsible bitches like you.
Another example of why radical conservatives are considered batshit crazy
Your argument is literally that its batshit crazy to feed hungry children.
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
They get to make the final choice. It is in her interest it is an informed choice. Can't do that without an ultrasound.And we expect a ultrasound first. Perfect compromise and fair to the baby whose life may be terminated.Nope. Hypocrisy is saying one thing but thinking something else. I say that women should have the right to make their own reproductive choices. And I think the exact same thing.
A perfect comprimise would be leaving medical decisions to the woman and her doctor. Not forcing non-necessary medical procedures on women because you don't like that they get to make the choice for themselves.
Forcing a woman to undergo a medically unnecessary procedure has nothing to do with 'medical safety'. Forcing a woman to look at an ultrasound has nothing to do with 'medical safety'.
It has everything to do with harassing and humiliating women.
It has everything to do with understanding what the choice is. I agree in that it's an unnecessary procedure and should not be performed.
The woman does need to understand however, that this choice causes a human being to die. Her child.
That should be a horribly difficult choice that should haunt her days. That child will die, never become what they may be as a result of that choice.
Ending a human life should never be quick or easy.
Do you advocate that anyone killing those two cells go to prison?Yes, it is life. You're wrong
in your view. life exists on a continuum from two cells to birth. you don't get to decide what that is.
the ONLY question is when the governmental interest exceeds our own
and that's been settled for a long time.
notwithstanding yet another fraudulent article in life news.
It's a scientific fact that from 2 cells to birth that's an individual human being, unique in all respects and genetically complete from the moment of conception.
Have a problem with that? Argue with the sciences of Genetics, Taxonomy, Human Physiology, Biology, etc.
A is A.
You want to send 17 year old girls to prison?
Do you support sending people to prison who knowingly kill a human being?
Scientific fact....human being, separate and unique in all aspects. Not being disputed if you'll notice by anyone, as it's indisputable. A is A.
So when multiple embryos are implanted in a woman's womb on the hope that some will grow to maturity.......that's child endangerment?
Mass murder unless everyone of them grows?
And wouldn't freezing embryo be kidnapping? Or at the very least, reckless endangerment?
If not, why not?
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
They get to make the final choice. It is in her interest it is an informed choice. Can't do that without an ultrasound.And we expect a ultrasound first. Perfect compromise and fair to the baby whose life may be terminated.
A perfect comprimise would be leaving medical decisions to the woman and her doctor. Not forcing non-necessary medical procedures on women because you don't like that they get to make the choice for themselves.
Forcing a woman to undergo a medically unnecessary procedure has nothing to do with 'medical safety'. Forcing a woman to look at an ultrasound has nothing to do with 'medical safety'.
It has everything to do with harassing and humiliating women.
It has everything to do with understanding what the choice is. I agree in that it's an unnecessary procedure and should not be performed.
The woman does need to understand however, that this choice causes a human being to die. Her child.
That should be a horribly difficult choice that should haunt her days. That child will die, never become what they may be as a result of that choice.
Ending a human life should never be quick or easy.
women already understand what the choices are.
but thanks for mansplaining it.
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
That's why they use terms like clump of cells and zygote...it helps dehumanize it
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
That's why they use terms like clump of cells and zygote...it helps dehumanize it
And it's why their heads explode when it's suggested that an ultra sound be part of the information given to a women prior to her getting an abortion, so she can make a fully informed decision. I thought progressive were in favor of educating the masses?
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
That's why they use terms like clump of cells and zygote...it helps dehumanize it
Do you advocate that anyone killing those two cells go to prison?in your view. life exists on a continuum from two cells to birth. you don't get to decide what that is.
the ONLY question is when the governmental interest exceeds our own
and that's been settled for a long time.
notwithstanding yet another fraudulent article in life news.
It's a scientific fact that from 2 cells to birth that's an individual human being, unique in all respects and genetically complete from the moment of conception.
Have a problem with that? Argue with the sciences of Genetics, Taxonomy, Human Physiology, Biology, etc.
A is A.
You want to send 17 year old girls to prison?
Do you support sending people to prison who knowingly kill a human being?
Scientific fact....human being, separate and unique in all aspects. Not being disputed if you'll notice by anyone, as it's indisputable. A is A.
So when multiple embryos are implanted in a woman's womb on the hope that some will grow to maturity.......that's child endangerment?
Mass murder unless everyone of them grows?
And wouldn't freezing embryo be kidnapping? Or at the very least, reckless endangerment?
If not, why not?
Excellent, you're starting to think. Good.
You're starting to acknowledge those human beings exist, and there are both moral and legal questions to be answered.
Once you've understood they are human beings, and THEIR rights need to at least be explored, you're on the road to enlightenment.
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
That's why they use terms like clump of cells and zygote...it helps dehumanize it
That and "person". That's the great trap most people who think abortion is wrong on moral grounds fall into. They start arguing using the same terminology, and once they do, they've lost.
Human being. Stick to the science, stick to the facts, stick to the truth.
If you do, they will rapidly result to firing off insults.
NOTE: Not once have I said it should not be legal. What the choice is...should be made clear. A human being dies as a result of that choice.
A horrible responsibility.
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
That's why they use terms like clump of cells and zygote...it helps dehumanize it
That and "person". That's the great trap most people who think abortion is wrong on moral grounds fall into. They start arguing using the same terminology, and once they do, they've lost.
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
That's why they use terms like clump of cells and zygote...it helps dehumanize it
And it's why their heads explode when it's suggested that an ultra sound be part of the information given to a women prior to her getting an abortion, so she can make a fully informed decision. I thought progressive were in favor of educating the masses?
You know..You're the batshit crazy one rightwinger being against people who don't want to pay for yours and others fuckups.Religious extremist white males should get out of women's personal decisions.
Not the life ewes is. Credible source.
If you don't want an abortion don't have one.
Leave everyone else alone.
If you can't afford kids, don't have them. Get out of my wallet. If you can't feed your own kids, don't have them. If you have them and can't feed them, either find some bleeding heart, good luck, or do without, tough shit.
so you force someone to have a kid they can't afford? and then say screw them let them live in poverty, wacko?
how about we stop paying for your viagra.
again, radial religious rightwing men should get out of women's business. you wackos haven't been able to tolerate, since the '60's, women not needing you to make their decisions for them... not need men to control them, not need men to own them by not letting women control their own bodies
make your own decisions.
btw, you're disgusting and immoral. what did women do to you that you hate them so much?
or is it that men aren't allowed to beat women into submission anymore that you resent?
Anyone that would allow a woman to make a choice then demand someone else pay for it is disgusting and immoral.
I love women. I hate irresponsible bitches like you.
Another example of why radical conservatives are considered batshit crazy
That progressives believe abortion - a procedure which ends the life of another human being - shouldn't be emotionally traumatizing and difficult for the women speaks volumes.
That's why they use terms like clump of cells and zygote...it helps dehumanize it
That and "person". That's the great trap most people who think abortion is wrong on moral grounds fall into. They start arguing using the same terminology, and once they do, they've lost.
More accurately, we don't summarize humanity solely be DNA. If such were the case, then any skin cell would be a human being. Or at the very least, human life.
