More proof Americans love diversity

To me, it's absurd to give a test to a child, and then base your decisions on how to run their entire life, on the basis of that test. But we keep doing it.
For over a century IQ tests have proven their ability to accurately predict academic and economic success.
 
Um, given we built this country on genocide and slavery, that's nothing to be proud of.

Being victims of Genocide, you'd think the Israelis would know better... but they are like abused children who grow up to be serial killers.
So the millions of people who came from Europe and their ancestors did nothing to built the country.

The genocide bit is stupid even for someone as pathologically disturbed as yourself.
 
Um, given we built this country on genocide and slavery, that's nothing to be proud of.
I do not see you moving any time soon. Whites benefit from the displacement of the American Indians. None of us benefit from the slave trade.
 
Diversity is great and programs to increase Diversity as well. Diversity and Diversity programs should not compromise ethics and standards in certain professions. For example, if Neurosurgeons are under represented by certain race or social class, does it make sense to lower the ethics and standards so that diversity goals can be met?
 
For over a century IQ tests have proven their ability to accurately predict academic and economic success.
Seems more like they are self-fulfilling prophecies.

I do not see you moving any time soon. Whites benefit from the displacement of the American Indians. None of us benefit from the slave trade.
These are both things we should be ashamed of.

Yes, slavery built this country by building the initial agricultural and industrial base.

If you took a history class, you'd know this.
 
Yes, slavery built this country by building the initial agricultural and industrial base.
Wrong again. Slavery only benefited those rich enough to buy slaves. In the South family farms could not compete with plantations. Nearly every trade and profession paid more in free states than in slave states. The vast majority of European immigrants moved to the free states, because that is where the economic opportunities. were.

The South has always been the economic backwater of the United States. The industrial revolution happened in the North. The computer revolution is happening on the West Coast.
 
You do realize that they did have industry, just not as much as the north, right?
Not nearly as much. That became a real problem during the Civil War. Northern factories turned out weapons by mass production. These had to be built by gun smiths in the South.
 
Wrong again. Slavery only benefited those rich enough to buy slaves. In the South family farms could not compete with plantations. Nearly every trade and profession paid more in free states than in slave states. The vast majority of European immigrants moved to the free states, because that is where the economic opportunities. were.

If that were the case, the majority of non-slave owners wouldn't have fought to the death to preserve slavery.

The South has always been the economic backwater of the United States. The industrial revolution happened in the North. The computer revolution is happening on the West Coast.
Hmmm... you are saying the most racist part of the country is a backwater. Hmmmm... and you don't see why racism is a bad thing? Hmmmmm....


Not nearly as much. That became a real problem during the Civil War. Northern factories turned out weapons by mass production. These had to be built by gun smiths in the South.

Oh, the south couldn't match the north for industrial output, they had enough industry, though to keep the war going for four years.

Why do you think Sherman had to engage in Scorched Earth tactics. To break the back of the Confederacy.
 
If that were the case, the majority of non-slave owners wouldn't have fought to the death to preserve slavery.

They fought to defend the Confederacy for the same reason lower income whites in the United States have become a Republican constituency.
 
Hmmm... you are saying the most racist part of the country is a backwater. Hmmmm... and you don't see why racism is a bad thing? Hmmmmm....
The more contact one has with Negroes the more likely one is to have a bad opinion of them.
 
Oh, the south couldn't match the north for industrial output, they had enough industry, though to keep the war going for four years.

Why do you think Sherman had to engage in Scorched Earth tactics. To break the back of the Confederacy.
It was not because the South had enough industry.
 
They fought to defend the Confederacy for the same reason lower income whites in the United States have become a Republican constituency.
Because they are stupid?

It was not because the South had enough industry
They had enough to make guns and cannons and ammo, and uniforms, etc.

You really don't understand military logistics at all, do you?
 
Hate merchants should have no platform when they preach hate. They are not legitimate.
It is more important in our nation to allow these platforms under the First Amendment, than to stifle them as doing so would potentially erode all speech.
 
It is more important in our nation to allow these platforms under the First Amendment, than to stifle them as doing so would potentially erode all speech.
That's because the instant you grant someone the authority to decide a viewpoint is illegitimate and the power to silence it, you start the clock to that power being used in horrific ways to control the populace.
 
Diversity of color and gender are fine as long as we all have a common goal. Therein lies the problem. Many on the left are not pro-America. They are globalists.
Globalist anti white turncoats
 
Well, white people kind of suck, but most of the Globalists are in fact... white people.

Who do you think shows up at Davos and the Bilderberger and Trilateralist meetings? It's all fucking white folks.
I dont deny that guilt-ridden white libs are the biggest threat to white people as a whole

So you have discovered an acorn
 

Forum List

Back
Top