"Most Secure Election in History!"

[JoeB131]

I didn't believe that to be true as recently as a few months ago, but Trump has exposed the fact that the EC system is so open to abuse by a dishonest candidate and party.

What Trump is trying to do throws democracy out the window and the fact that the system is so archaic is why that is possible

I always thought this was the case, because these bits of crazy were always lurking beneath the surface.

 

[JoeB131]

Out of Nancy Pelosi's ass through your lips

Duly noted you are incapable of discussing the topic.

 

[theHawk]

And with a link! Meister

The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee ... released the following statement:​

​

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.​

​

“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.​

Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees | CISA

The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State...

www.cisa.gov

View attachment 415376

“No evidence”? They already caught several thousand votes switched by SOFTWARE. That’s not disputed. The only argument the left has is “it wasn’t enough to change the election”. How do we know that without a full investigation?

 

[kaz]

Out of Nancy Pelosi's ass through your lips

Duly noted you are incapable of discussing the topic.

So when most of your life for every Republican victory you pumped your fist and did a dance for how you worship the rich and just helped them and you hated nggers and wanted government to not have welfare because you were OK with whites getting it but not negroes, what made you put down your gun and bible and decide to stop worshipping the rich and wanting government that does not help the darkies you hated?

 

[TheParser]

The establishment that so desperately wanted to get rid of Don, says the election lost by Don is the most secure in history. If you believe that, you’ll believe anything.

The statement that this was our most secure election in American history is an excellent example of whistling in the dark.

Why would those bureaucrats make such a hyperbolic statement unless they had something to hide?

Probably the most secure election was at the very beginning of the Republic when the electors actually voted for who they thought was the best candidate.

 

[Lesh]

“No evidence”? They already caught several thousand votes switched by SOFTWARE. That’s not disputed.

Yea it actually IS disputed

From USAToday

Government, experts agree: There were no deleted or changed votes, including by Dominion
A national coalition announced Thursday that there is no evidence that any voting software deleted or changed votes in last week's election, per USA TODAY.

In fact, the security group — which includes the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the National Association of State Election Directors — described the election as "the most secure in American history."

"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised," the coalition concluded.

 

[JoeB131]

“No evidence”? They already caught several thousand votes switched by SOFTWARE. That’s not disputed. The only argument the left has is “it wasn’t enough to change the election”. How do we know that without a full investigation?

Except Software didn't change any vote counts, the errors were identified and corrected.

 

[kaz]

“No evidence”? They already caught several thousand votes switched by SOFTWARE. That’s not disputed. The only argument the left has is “it wasn’t enough to change the election”. How do we know that without a full investigation?

Except Software didn't change any vote counts, the errors were identified and corrected.

And you know that how?

 

[Lesh]

Here's a fun fact for you. Dominion wasn't even used in those heavily Democratic districts of PA

 

[Lesh]

Trump continues to gaslight...and that's why he lost