Mueller's Criminal Past

[LoneLaugher]

True Pundit is running a story today about how Mueller committed perjury while testifying under oath about Saddam Hussein stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

Flashback: Mueller Perjures Himself Testifying Saddam Hussein Is Stockpiling Weapons of Mass Destruction (VIDEO)
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, while FBI director, testified that Iraqi strong-man Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

We all know how that ended. And if you don’t feel free to research it.

Don’t be surprised if President Trump, who Mueller is now investigating, becomes Mueller’s next Saddam Hussein.

So let me get this straight. I don't want to misunderstand what I am hearing.

After insisting and insisting and insisting for 13 years there were WMDs in Iraq, the pseudocon position is now the left wing position? To wit, there were never any WMDs in Iraq.

Is this correct?

Did I say Trump was going to lead the pseudocons into the left wing camp, or what?

Why yes. Yes, I did.

Were there WMD's?

 

[iceberg]

as long as he cleans up when he's done.

 

[The Original Tree]

True Pundit is running a story today about how Mueller committed perjury while testifying under oath about Saddam Hussein stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

Flashback: Mueller Perjures Himself Testifying Saddam Hussein Is Stockpiling Weapons of Mass Destruction (VIDEO)
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, while FBI director, testified that Iraqi strong-man Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

We all know how that ended. And if you don’t feel free to research it.

Don’t be surprised if President Trump, who Mueller is now investigating, becomes Mueller’s next Saddam Hussein.

So let me get this straight. I don't want to misunderstand what I am hearing.

After insisting and insisting and insisting for 13 years there were WMDs in Iraq, the pseudocon position is now the left wing position? To wit, there were never any WMDs in Iraq.

Is this correct?

Did I say Trump was going to lead the pseudocons into the left wing camp, or what?

Why yes. Yes, I did.

Were there WMD's?

They are in Al Capone's vault with Russian Collusion.

 

[iceberg]

True Pundit is running a story today about how Mueller committed perjury while testifying under oath about Saddam Hussein stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

Flashback: Mueller Perjures Himself Testifying Saddam Hussein Is Stockpiling Weapons of Mass Destruction (VIDEO)
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, while FBI director, testified that Iraqi strong-man Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

We all know how that ended. And if you don’t feel free to research it.

Don’t be surprised if President Trump, who Mueller is now investigating, becomes Mueller’s next Saddam Hussein.

As a pious and practicing bible thumper aren't you concerned about violating on of the Ten Commandments? Confess your sins you transgressor!

you like to bag on religion and seem to have no concept of how it works, just that you use it to insult people.

 

[Reasonable]

True Pundit is running a story today about how Mueller committed perjury while testifying under oath about Saddam Hussein stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

Flashback: Mueller Perjures Himself Testifying Saddam Hussein Is Stockpiling Weapons of Mass Destruction (VIDEO)
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, while FBI director, testified that Iraqi strong-man Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

We all know how that ended. And if you don’t feel free to research it.

Don’t be surprised if President Trump, who Mueller is now investigating, becomes Mueller’s next Saddam Hussein.

True pundit? ?
Are. You kidding?
Info wars mext

They're here to amuse us with their off the wall sources.
And god damn do they amuse us..

 

[g5000]

True Pundit is running a story today about how Mueller committed perjury while testifying under oath about Saddam Hussein stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

Flashback: Mueller Perjures Himself Testifying Saddam Hussein Is Stockpiling Weapons of Mass Destruction (VIDEO)
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, while FBI director, testified that Iraqi strong-man Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

We all know how that ended. And if you don’t feel free to research it.

Don’t be surprised if President Trump, who Mueller is now investigating, becomes Mueller’s next Saddam Hussein.

So let me get this straight. I don't want to misunderstand what I am hearing.

After insisting and insisting and insisting for 13 years there were WMDs in Iraq, the pseudocon position is now the left wing position? To wit, there were never any WMDs in Iraq.

Is this correct?

Did I say Trump was going to lead the pseudocons into the left wing camp, or what?

Why yes. Yes, I did.

Were there WMD's?

Ask Jeremiah. Then ask him again on an even numbered day.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

And now...the kill stroke.

The OP links to a hack web site, which in turn links to a 25 second video on Twitter. The video is an excerpt from FBI Director Mueller's testimony to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in February 2003.

Here is Mueller's full testimony: 2003 National Security Threats to the United States

As you can see when you read it for yourself, Mueller's testimony is entirely in relation to the domestic efforts of the FBI to protect our homeland from chemical, biological, and nuclear attacks by terrorists, particularly by Al Qaeda.

In his testimony, Mueller alludes to testimony given by Secretary Powell about WMDs in Iraq. Mueller himself is not confirming or testifying there are WMDs in Iraq. He merely states the testimony by Powell about WMDs in Iraq gave him concern those WMDs would get into the hands of terrorists.

The FBI concerns itself with domestic threats.

So the OP is a total lie. Mueller did not perjure himself.

Once again, the parroting hacks fell for another hoax.

And they will get back in line to be lied to again. Every time I have predicted this, I have never been wrong.

It won't happen again.

Like I said above, it already has, prole. And will again. And again. And again, ad infinitum.

You can't stop yourselves. You are mentally, emotionally, and psychologically incapable of stopping yourselves.

That's your opinion. I think Mueller was at the very least "misleading" .......

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Christians are called to speak out against evil and what Mueller is doing is clearly wicked. He has nothing and he knows it. Why are you afraid of looking at some of Mueller's past record? We haven't even touched on how he handled the IRS Scandal on this thread.

Who the hell nominated you judge & jury?

In case you aren't aware you're making Christians look bad in this thread. You CLAIM to be the arbiter of righteousness so let's have a look a bit deeper.

Meuller claims Iraq had wmd = wicked/evil

Every other person in America who made the same claim?

Trump brags about sexually accosting women? Did you speak up then?
Trump manufactures most of his shit overseas but tells us to do it here? Did you speak up then?

The double standard is glaring and the pretend righteous indignation is laughable

The average American citizen - both Christian and non-Christian believed the media reports and the President who said there was WMD's. Mueller testified under oath there were WMD's. The Democrats said there were WMD's before they said there weren't any. As Mueller testified under oath that there were WMD's he was indicating he had information the rest of us didn't have. But he lied. He perjured himself. And we are supposed to trust this man to investigate our President? Not a chance. Mueller couldn't even admit he went after an innocent man in the anthrax case. Don't expect him to admit he is once again going after an innocent man. He lacks the integrity to admit when he is wrong. Mueller must go.

Mueller has more integrity in his fingernail than the whole Trump family has and I can get everyone in Congress to corroborate that..
Damn are you fighting a losing battle!!

I disagree. If Mueller had a shred of integrity he would have recused himself from this investigation already. His 15 yr friendship with Comey is a very serious conflict of interest. I don't trust either of them.

Who cares who YOU trust? You're a deplorable and inconsequential.
No one in Congress is on your side so you're swimming alone on this one..

Oh lookie, more of that character assassination that you claim the right always does.

Back to ignore with you. You're a useless contributor to this forum.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

It's only perjury if he knowingly told a falsehood. Getting it wrong, as many did, is not perjury.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It's only perjury if he knowingly told a falsehood. Getting it wrong, as many did, is not perjury.

I've been trying to explain that to her for 7 pages lol

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

This is the end result when you fall prey to fake news.

Watch the video of Mueller testifying under oath. It's in the video connected to link in OP.

Telling Congress what YOU BELIEVE TO BE TRUE despite it being found to be dubious later is not perjury, it is a mistake based on bad Intel.

As I've stated multiple times now. THIS IS AN ABSURD POSITION. You fell for internet partisan hate bait. Just admit it and MOVE ON

He has a history of not admitting his "mistakes." I don't expect that to change now.. sorry. Mueller should not be investigating our President.

 

[g5000]

And now...the kill stroke.

The OP links to a hack web site, which in turn links to a 25 second video on Twitter. The video is an excerpt from FBI Director Mueller's testimony to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in February 2003.

Here is Mueller's full testimony: 2003 National Security Threats to the United States

As you can see when you read it for yourself, Mueller's testimony is entirely in relation to the domestic efforts of the FBI to protect our homeland from chemical, biological, and nuclear attacks by terrorists, particularly by Al Qaeda.

In his testimony, Mueller alludes to testimony given by Secretary Powell about WMDs in Iraq. Mueller himself is not confirming or testifying there are WMDs in Iraq. He merely states the testimony by Powell about WMDs in Iraq gave him concern those WMDs would get into the hands of terrorists.

The FBI concerns itself with domestic threats.

So the OP is a total lie. Mueller did not perjure himself.

Once again, the parroting hacks fell for another hoax.

And they will get back in line to be lied to again. Every time I have predicted this, I have never been wrong.

It won't happen again.

Like I said above, it already has, prole. And will again. And again. And again, ad infinitum.

You can't stop yourselves. You are mentally, emotionally, and psychologically incapable of stopping yourselves.

That's your opinion. I think Mueller was at the very least "misleading" .......

No, there is no opinion about it. It's a fact.

You didn't even read the link.

You can't handle anything longer than a tweet.

What an easy rube you are! You don't even make it hard for them.

 

[Reasonable]

And now...the kill stroke.

The OP links to a hack web site, which in turn links to a 25 second video on Twitter. The video is an excerpt from FBI Director Mueller's testimony to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in February 2003.

Here is Mueller's full testimony: 2003 National Security Threats to the United States

As you can see when you read it for yourself, Mueller's testimony is entirely in relation to the domestic efforts of the FBI to protect our homeland from chemical, biological, and nuclear attacks by terrorists, particularly by Al Qaeda.

In his testimony, Mueller alludes to testimony given by Secretary Powell about WMDs in Iraq. Mueller himself is not confirming or testifying there are WMDs in Iraq. He merely states the testimony by Powell about WMDs in Iraq gave him concern those WMDs would get into the hands of terrorists.

The FBI concerns itself with domestic threats.

So the OP is a total lie. Mueller did not perjure himself.

Once again, the parroting hacks fell for another hoax.

And they will get back in line to be lied to again. Every time I have predicted this, I have never been wrong.

It won't happen again.

Like I said above, it already has, prole. And will again. And again. And again, ad infinitum.

You can't stop yourselves. You are mentally, emotionally, and psychologically incapable of stopping yourselves.

That's your opinion. I think Mueller was at the very least "misleading" .......

Once again no one cares what you think when Dems and repukes are totally united in their support of Mueller. What about this don't you get??

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

It's only perjury if he knowingly told a falsehood. Getting it wrong, as many did, is not perjury.

How do you know what he knew and what he didn't? Answer: You don't.

 

[TheDude]

True Pundit is running a story today about how Mueller committed perjury while testifying under oath about Saddam Hussein stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

Flashback: Mueller Perjures Himself Testifying Saddam Hussein Is Stockpiling Weapons of Mass Destruction (VIDEO)
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, while FBI director, testified that Iraqi strong-man Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

We all know how that ended. And if you don’t feel free to research it.

Don’t be surprised if President Trump, who Mueller is now investigating, becomes Mueller’s next Saddam Hussein.

So let me get this straight. I don't want to misunderstand what I am hearing.

After insisting and insisting and insisting for 13 years there were WMDs in Iraq, the pseudocon position is now the left wing position? To wit, there were never any WMDs in Iraq.

Is this correct?

Did I say Trump was going to lead the pseudocons into the left wing camp, or what?

Why yes. Yes, I did.

Silly G5000, you'll like this a lot.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

And now...the kill stroke.

The OP links to a hack web site, which in turn links to a 25 second video on Twitter. The video is an excerpt from FBI Director Mueller's testimony to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in February 2003.

Here is Mueller's full testimony: 2003 National Security Threats to the United States

As you can see when you read it for yourself, Mueller's testimony is entirely in relation to the domestic efforts of the FBI to protect our homeland from chemical, biological, and nuclear attacks by terrorists, particularly by Al Qaeda.

In his testimony, Mueller alludes to testimony given by Secretary Powell about WMDs in Iraq. Mueller himself is not confirming or testifying there are WMDs in Iraq. He merely states the testimony by Powell about WMDs in Iraq gave him concern those WMDs would get into the hands of terrorists.

The FBI concerns itself with domestic threats.

So the OP is a total lie. Mueller did not perjure himself.

Once again, the parroting hacks fell for another hoax.

And they will get back in line to be lied to again. Every time I have predicted this, I have never been wrong.

It won't happen again.

Like I said above, it already has, prole. And will again. And again. And again, ad infinitum.

You can't stop yourselves. You are mentally, emotionally, and psychologically incapable of stopping yourselves.

That's your opinion. I think Mueller was at the very least "misleading" .......

Once again no one cares what you think when Dems and repukes are totally united in their support of Mueller. What about this don't you get??

Rino's. Not Republicans. Next election they will be sent home - God willing.

 

[g5000]

It's only perjury if he knowingly told a falsehood. Getting it wrong, as many did, is not perjury.

Mueller didn't even tell a falsehood. He merely stated that Powell had testified there were WMDs in Iraq. Powell did say there were WMDs in Iraq, and so Mueller was telling the truth.

Because Powell said Hussien had WMDs, it was Mueller's duty to be concerned those WMDs not end up being used here in America against us.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It's only perjury if he knowingly told a falsehood. Getting it wrong, as many did, is not perjury.

How do you know what he knew and what he didn't? Answer: You don't.

And you do?

Insane

 

[Reasonable]

This is the end result when you fall prey to fake news.

Watch the video of Mueller testifying under oath. It's in the video connected to link in OP.

Telling Congress what YOU BELIEVE TO BE TRUE despite it being found to be dubious later is not perjury, it is a mistake based on bad Intel.

As I've stated multiple times now. THIS IS AN ABSURD POSITION. You fell for internet partisan hate bait. Just admit it and MOVE ON

He has a history of not admitting his "mistakes." I don't expect that to change now.. sorry. Mueller should not be investigating our President.

Yet he is investigating the whiny little bitch and when he's done you'll see the whiniest bitch of the century.
Mueller is great at what he's doing. Expect indictments and arrests.
It will be sweet.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

It's only perjury if he knowingly told a falsehood. Getting it wrong, as many did, is not perjury.

How do you know what he knew and what he didn't? Answer: You don't.

Nor do you. I'm just giving him the benefit for the doubt. And hey, for the record, I'm no fan.