Dot Com
Nullius in verba
- Feb 15, 2011
- 52,842
- 7,883
here's a pictorial tribute now that the empire is crumbling: The Rise Of Rupert Murdoch's Empire - In Pictures
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fucking immigrants.
So, you don't come from immigrant stock?
Here's a link to a feed if you want to witness the downfall
BBC News - Murdochs grilled by MPs
Here's Cspan's feed w/ video: Live Video - C-SPAN3 | C-SPAN
The table was headed by the Daily Mail, which paid for 952 pieces of information, ordered by 58 of its staff.
Next came the Sunday People, the Daily Mirror, the Mail on Sunday and the News of the World. The BBC published the list at the time, but few newspapers did, perhaps not surprisingly.
The Daily Mail's publisher dismissed the findings as "utterly meaningless", saying: "Associated Newspapers, in common with all newspapers and broadcasters - and many other organisations, including lawyers - use search agencies to obtain information entirely legitimately from a range of public sources."
Acquiring some personal information, in some ways, can be legal if used in the public interest.
It can be a legitimate technique of investigative journalism and curtailing that power could infringe the freedom of the press.
The Observer and Sunday Times both appeared in the Information Commissioner's league table, not just tabloids.
Rupert Murdoch tells MPs he cannot be held responsible for phone hacking, but was let down by "people I trusted" in a day of drama at a parliamentary select committee.
I don't know if any of you can watch the live feed of the Select Committee hearings with James and Rupert Murdoch, but.... man, they have some dumb schmucks on that panel. Seems to me they are asking some seriously ill thought out questions.
Example: Context: Rupert Murdoch had a meeting at 10 Downing St with the Prime Minster. Mr Murdoch used the 'back door'. One of the members asked Rupert Murdoch why he used the back door. He responded that he was asked to. So the committee member asked him why he was asked to use the back door. How the hell would he know why? And what the hell is the importance of what door he used? There's serious shit and wrong doing and they're asking him which door he used. Good grief.
I don't know if any of you can watch the live feed of the Select Committee hearings with James and Rupert Murdoch, but.... man, they have some dumb schmucks on that panel. Seems to me they are asking some seriously ill thought out questions.
Example: Context: Rupert Murdoch had a meeting at 10 Downing St with the Prime Minster. Mr Murdoch used the 'back door'. One of the members asked Rupert Murdoch why he used the back door. He responded that he was asked to. So the committee member asked him why he was asked to use the back door. How the hell would he know why? And what the hell is the importance of what door he used? There's serious shit and wrong doing and they're asking him which door he used. Good grief.
Thats all party politics some are calling for Cameron to step down. Cameron's having a rough time over Coulson and his links with the phone hacking. Plus also his links with Murdoch and Brooks. Hes had to publish all his meetings with them so guess the question was to trap Cameron. So when he said the back door that does not look good as looks like Cameron was trying to hide the meeting.
I don't know if any of you can watch the live feed of the Select Committee hearings with James and Rupert Murdoch, but.... man, they have some dumb schmucks on that panel. Seems to me they are asking some seriously ill thought out questions.
Example: Context: Rupert Murdoch had a meeting at 10 Downing St with the Prime Minster. Mr Murdoch used the 'back door'. One of the members asked Rupert Murdoch why he used the back door. He responded that he was asked to. So the committee member asked him why he was asked to use the back door. How the hell would he know why? And what the hell is the importance of what door he used? There's serious shit and wrong doing and they're asking him which door he used. Good grief.
Thats all party politics some are calling for Cameron to step down. Cameron's having a rough time over Coulson and his links with the phone hacking. Plus also his links with Murdoch and Brooks. Hes had to publish all his meetings with them so guess the question was to trap Cameron. So when he said the back door that does not look good as looks like Cameron was trying to hide the meeting.
I cant wait to find out whats in the email folder. We have heard so much about it and from what people are saying that where the real crimes are.
from BBC live feeds
June Kelly Home Affairs correspondent A senior lawyer has told the Home Affairs Select Committee that material which News International handed over to the police last month contained evidence of serious criminal offences. After Scotland Yard received the file they launched Operation Elvedon - the investigation into alleged corrupt payments to police officers. It is running in conjunction with the inquiry into phone hacking. The top QC, Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, (the former Director of Public Prosecutions) was employed by News Corporation to examine the material. He said that when he told the board what was in the file they were stunned and shocked.
I think this is what Brooks might have been referring to when she said they was worst to come.
That's a good question.I was trying to explain this story to a friend of mine today and it took about 20 minutes.
There are so many twists and turns so far, and this is only the beginning.
Watching Murdoch lie to Parliament was pretty pathetic.
I wonder if lying to Parliament is a crime?
I was trying to explain this story to a friend of mine today and it took about 20 minutes.
There are so many twists and turns so far, and this is only the beginning.
Watching Murdoch lie to Parliament was pretty pathetic.
I wonder if lying to Parliament is a crime?