Muslim attack in CA just cost Democrats the entire 2016 election.

bucs90

Gold Member
Feb 25, 2010
26,545
6,027
280
Liberals placed their bets with their "Hug a Thug" policy regarding radical Muslims and urban street thugs. It has backfired in dramatic fashion.

I fear many more will occur in the next 11 months. And it's gonna cost Democrats dearly.
 
The GOP arms these terrorists wh assault rifles , vests, and endless ammo .

And you think this hurts the dems ??
 
ISIS declares war on us. Attacks begin. And liberals make jokes.

That's why you people cannot ever be in charge again.
 
The GOP arms these terrorists wh assault rifles , vests, and endless ammo .

And you think this hurts the dems ??

Actually....the liberals who founded this country armed them when they passed the 2nd Amendment. Liberals.....did found America....right?
 
Liberals placed their bets with their "Hug a Thug" policy regarding radical Muslims and urban street thugs. It has backfired in dramatic fashion.

I fear many more will occur in the next 11 months. And it's gonna cost Democrats dearly.

You insane? Oh wait, look who I'm posting to...

So tell us o pathetically preposterous pundit --- the effect of Robert Dear was.... what?

Oops -- 'member him?

Doublethink lives.
 
It all depends............................

If the GOP can scare the population badly enough, they might have a chance in 2016.

It worked to get Jr. elected for a second term.
 
ISIS declares war on us. Attacks begin. And liberals make jokes.

That's why you people cannot ever be in charge again.

Well we are bombing them. We've been at war with them for a while now .
 
It all depends............................

Careful --- that's what David Vitter said and look where he is.

IIf the GOP can scare the population badly enough, they might have a chance in 2016.

It worked to get Jr. elected for a second term.

I'm not sure how the OP arrives at his wishful thinking fantasy -- I hear the DP making more and more noises about "gun control" and while I don't think that's the answer, I hear zero from the RP on the issue. Nothing but "protect the right to slaughter bear arms". Seems to me anyone concerned with a nation suffering an average of a mass shooting every day, which oughta be the vast majority by now, would want it addressed. By something.
 
It all depends............................

Careful --- that's what David Vitter said and look where he is.

IIf the GOP can scare the population badly enough, they might have a chance in 2016.

It worked to get Jr. elected for a second term.

I'm not sure how the OP arrives at his wishful thinking fantasy -- I hear the DP making more and more noises about "gun control" and while I don't think that's the answer, I hear zero from the RP on the issue. Nothing but "protect the right to slaughter bear arms". Seems to me anyone concerned with a nation suffering an average of a mass shooting every day, which oughta be the vast majority by now, would want it addressed. By something.


Actually my link above only covers the 1004 days ending October 1st -- in the year 2015 it's actually MORE than one a day:

imrs.php


Note - the numbers don't represent number of victims that day --- they represent the number of mass shootings that day.
We've already surpassed 2014's total and are on pace to beat 2013 as well (363).

:shock:


USA! USA!
 
It all depends............................

Careful --- that's what David Vitter said and look where he is.

IIf the GOP can scare the population badly enough, they might have a chance in 2016.

It worked to get Jr. elected for a second term.

I'm not sure how the OP arrives at his wishful thinking fantasy -- I hear the DP making more and more noises about "gun control" and while I don't think that's the answer, I hear zero from the RP on the issue. Nothing but "protect the right to slaughter bear arms". Seems to me anyone concerned with a nation suffering an average of a mass shooting every day, which oughta be the vast majority by now, would want it addressed. By something.


Actually my link above only covers the 1004 days ending October 1st -- in the year 2015 it's actually MORE than one a day:

imrs.php


Note - the numbers don't represent number of victims that day --- they represent the number of mass shootings that day.
We've already surpassed 2014's total and are on pace to beat 2013 as well (363).

:shock:


USA! USA!

Posting the usual horseshit propaganda, I see.

Media Attempts To Redefine "Mass Shooting" In Order To Inflate Number Of Attacks - Bearing Arms - Anti-Gun Hysteria, propaganda, ShootingTracker.com

Media Attempts To Redefine “Mass Shooting” In Order To Inflate Number Of Attacks

The long-accepted definition of a mass shooting is, “four people or more people killed in a single event.” Others have further refined the definition to exclude gang-related activity, familicide, or terrorist attacks. Like the famous Supreme Court definition of pornography, it’s tough to create a catch-all to describe every possible kind of mass shooting, “but you know it when you see it.”

As Tamara Keel dryly noted this morning, propaganda outlets are attempting to radically change that definition.

Remember: New definition of “mass shooting” is “four or more people hit by bullets”. Remember that when they trot the totals out. If JJ shoots Pookie, Ice Dog, and Ray-Ray, and one of them manages to wing him back with return fire, that’s a “mass shooting”.

The left wing media is using grotesquely manipulated data from a site called ShootingTracker.com in order grossly inflate the number of mass shootings in the country, at least doubling them, in an effort to create the false impression that the number of shootings is going up in order to create a political environment to call for more gun control laws.

The media has to resort to citing propaganda outfits that lie and change definitions, because violent crime and crime with firearms is actually on a dramatic long-term decline.

The site owner of ShootingTracker.com is affiliated with Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety, which has been nailed repeatedly for grossly inflating the number of school shootings in the United States by fraudulently manipulating definitions as well.
 
It all depends............................

If the GOP can scare the population badly enough, they might have a chance in 2016.

It worked to get Jr. elected for a second term.

Well, we all know what happened when the Democrats promised to hand out free stuff.

It worked well enough to get Obama elected twice.
 
What a sad OP.
Let me translate the title.
"The GOP just won the election thanks to 17 innocent people being murdered."
First the hard right uses the four deaths at Bengazi for political gain. Now they are already planning how they can use the 17 people slaughtered yesterday.
Talk about disgusting.
 
A Mass shooting can occur only during Mass.

The rest are 'public group shootings' like 'group trips' and 'group pictures'.

However, there is a free market solution to ending "group shootings"!

Since these shootings are so common, we should place a surcharge on shooters for target practice.

10$ for every 1 shot to an adult
25$ for every 1 shot to a teen or younger


Once 'public group shooting' becomes a recognizable market, all that is left is to tax it out of existence.

Who said there is no right wing answer to group shootings? Not this opportunistic capitalist!!
 
What a sad OP.
Let me translate the title.
"The GOP just won the election thanks to 17 innocent people being murdered."
First the hard right uses the four deaths at Bengazi for political gain. Now they are already planning how they can use the 17 people slaughtered yesterday.
Talk about disgusting.

So you think getting Americans killed should be a resume enhancement for Democrats?
 
It all depends............................

If the GOP can scare the population badly enough, they might have a chance in 2016.

It worked to get Jr. elected for a second term.

Well, we all know what happened when the Democrats promised to hand out free stuff.

It worked well enough to get Obama elected twice.

What "free stuff" might that have been? I never heard that campaign promise. Actually the only place I've heard about "free stuff" has been on this message board.

Anybody get "free stuff"? I didn't. :crybaby:
 

Forum List

Back
Top