progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,706
- 38,460
- 2,615
youre kidding right???if he was reaching for a gun,,,That's what most witness reports said. No, I'm sure of much of anything, except the guy got shot in the back 7 times. I ain't saying it was justified or not, certainly we oughta wait for the official report before making any judgments.
In your estimation, what would justify shooting an unarmed man in the back seven times?
Well, even if he was reaching for a gun (which he wasn't, as there was no gun in the car) the cop wouldn't be in imminent danger until the guy turned around. I know, it sounds silly, but it is what it is. Think about it: If the guy grabs a gun and doesn't turn around and aim it at the cop, the cop's not in danger of being shot.
So. there was no gun, so Blake wasn't reaching for a gun.
What else, then, could possibly justify shooting an unarmed man in the back seven times?