National review says Trump is DEFINATELY NUTS

[BULLDOG]

Noone can deny that the National Review is a conservative source and has a history of supporting virtually every major Republican politician or cause since its inception. In a recent article, the editor came short of supporting Harris, but did say Trump is an "unpopular, definitely nuts, septuagenarian". Donald Trump still claims his campaign is doing great, and he is leading in all the polls. I guess he really does believe those things since he is definitely nuts.

MSN

 

[lafayette]

N R is normally pretty close to the point.

 

[Rambunctious]

Kamala wants to turn a free nation into a communist nation and you call Trump nuts?????

 

[Rawley]

Noone can deny that the National Review is a conservative source and has a history of supporting virtually every major Republican politician or cause since its inception. In a recent article, the editor came short of supporting Harris, but did say Trump is an "unpopular, definitely nuts, septuagenarian". Donald Trump still claims his campaign is doing great, and he is leading in all the polls. I guess he really does believe those things since he is definitely nuts.

MSN

Pssst - National Review have been never Trumpers since 2016

 

[BULLDOG]

Kamala wants to turn a free nation into a communist nation and you call Trump nuts?????

Most sane people have called trump nuts for years. The National Review finally agrees with us.

 

[lafayette]

Pssst - N R knows something you don't.

 

[Rambunctious]

Most sane people have called trump nuts for years. The National Review finally agrees with us.

Maybe in your little world....

 

[Rambunctious]

Most sane people have called trump nuts for years. The National Review finally agrees with us.

Do you want to live under communist rule?....

 

[BULLDOG]

Pssst - National Review have been never Trumpers since 2016

Right. That's just like the high praise trump bestowed on each of his staff and cabinet until they finally had enough of his crap. After that he claimed they were all never trumpers.

 

[BULLDOG]

Maybe in your little world....

Yes, and in an editor's article at the site too.

 

[Rambunctious]

Yes, and in an editor's article at the site too.

Do you want to live under communist rule?....

 

[okfine]

NR wants to be real newsworthy for once.

 

[konradv]

Kamala wants to turn a free nation into a communist nation and you call Trump nuts?????

#MAGALIES

 

[Rambunctious]

#MAGALIES

Do you want to live under communist rule?....

 

[konradv]

Do you want to live under communist rule?....

#MADAMEPRESIDENT

 

[BULLDOG]

Do you want to live under communist rule?....

No, but that is such a stupid question. Nobody is wanting to have communist rule except for in trump and his cult's "definitely nuts" minds.

 

[BULLDOG]

For those who think this is fake news, you can look it up for yourself.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Noone can deny that the National Review is a conservative source and has a history of supporting virtually every major Republican politician or cause since its inception. In a recent article, the editor came short of supporting Harris, but did say Trump is an "unpopular, definitely nuts, septuagenarian". Donald Trump still claims his campaign is doing great, and he is leading in all the polls. I guess he really does believe those things since he is definitely nuts.

MSN

I'm not sure there are any politicians who aren't nuts to some degree. Similar to many CEOs and high powered lawyers, investment bankers...some of them are borderline psychos. I suppose the differences can be placed on a continuum of how much they market themselves relative to any good they do for their country.

When you are enjoying one of your favourite drinks, be it alcohol, coffee, cola or ice water, ponder that last sentence and make a list, in one column create the title, "Entered politics to do more for the country without personal gain", in another column a contradictory title, "Entered politics to do more for themselves than their nations benefit".

You may arrive at a greater appreciation for the complexity America of human nature that the world is facing.

 

[Rambunctious]

No, but that is such a stupid question. Nobody is wanting to have communist rule except for in trump and his cult's "definitely nuts" minds.

That is what Kamala is promoting... communism.... she is a Bernie Sanders in heels... the most liberal senator in the senate just a few short years ago...

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm not sure there are any politicians who aren't nuts to some degree. Similar to many CEOs and high powered lawyers, investment bankers...some of them are borderline psychos. I suppose the differences can be placed on a continuum of how much they market themselves relative to any good they do for their country.

When you are enjoying one of your favourite drinks, be it alcohol, coffee, cola or ice water, ponder that last sentence and make a list, in one column create the title, "Entered politics to do more for the country without personal gain", in another column a contradictory title, "Entered politics to do more for themselves than their nations benefit".

You may come to a greater appreciation of the complexity America and the world is facing.

There is a little nuts, which we all are, and BATSHIT CRAZY NUTS like trump is. There is a difference.