Todays court decision invalidated the prior Commissions approach to preserving an open internet, said FCC spokeswoman Jen Howard in a written statement. But the Court in no way disagreed with the importance of preserving a free and open Internet; nor did it close the door to other methods for achieving this important end.
Other methods obliquely refer to either Congress passing a law giving it the power (a process that would likely take years) or the FCC reclassifying broadband as a telecommunications service in legal terms, moving broadband from Title I to Title II of the Telecommunications Act.
Read More Court Drives FCC Towards Nuclear Option to Regulate Broadband | Epicenter | Wired.com
Dear T., this is what the Constitution allows.
However? Some dissented to the premise that they MUST or *else*.
And where is Title I and Title II of the 'Telecommunications Act' Contained in the Constitution...and what *DO* they say first off?
And to wit? Something YOU just posted?
..."But the Court in no way disagreed with the importance of preserving a free and open Internet; "
What is 'Free and OPEN' when a Government entity forces YOU to provide something, or practice something that you deem dangerous such as "TORRENT" to the Security of *YOUR* Network?
That isn't "Freedom"...that's Tyranny.
torrents aren't dangerous it was a cop out