Netanyahu discredited by guess who?

[Dot Com]

Obama does not like Israel for obvious reasons, his Muslim upbringing turns him against America greatness as well as that of Israel. Obama has a butt boy currently working the election in Israel to get a new prime minister voted in to power.

please don't make statements w/o supporting links mkay? Thats message board etiquette 101. google the latin words under my avie. Simple stuff you should already know/abide by.

 

[Darkwind]

So, what he said is true....Mossad is not reputable nor credible.

 

[Dot Com]

So, what he said is true....Mossad is not reputable nor credible.

ummm.....ok. You PREDICTABLY provided no sourcing for your zany allegation.

Going to do something I should have done LONG AGO. Ignore

 

[georgephillip]

So, what he said is true....Mossad is not reputable nor credible.

"That view tracks with the 2012 US National Intelligence estimate, which found no evidence that Iran had thus far taken a decision to use its nuclear infrastructure to build a weapon, or that it had revived efforts to research warhead design that the US said had been shelved in 2003.


"THE SPY CABLES
A leak of hundreds of secret intelligence papers from agencies all over the world, offering a glimpse into the murky world of espionage.

"Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit, in collaboration with The Guardian newspaper, is publishing a selection of the documents and the stories contained within them.
Click here for more
Netanyahu plans to address the US Congress on March 3 and warn against the nuclear compromise currently being negotiated between Tehran and world powers."
Maybe Bibi will tell congress why Israel is allowed to possess dozens of nuclear weapons while whining about Iran?

Mossad contradicted Netanyahu on Iran nuclear programme - Al Jazeera English

 

[TheOldSchool]

What will Bibi say when he addresses congress?

 

[TooTall]

Remember this one?

"Less than a month after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's 2012 warning to the UN General Assembly that Iran was 70 percent of the way to completing its 'plans to build a nuclear weapon', Israel's intelligence service believed that Iran was 'not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons'.

"A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012, that laid out a 'bottom line' assessment of Iran's nuclear work.

"It appears to contradict the picture painted by Netanyahu of Tehran racing towards acquisition of a nuclear bomb."

Mossad contradicted Netanyahu on Iran nuclear programme - Al Jazeera English

Why would Bibi and his useful idiots in the US congress deflect attention from the cause of violence across the Middle East?

"A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012, that laid out a 'bottom line' assessment of Iran's nuclear work."

Now there is a credible source if I ever saw one!

 

[georgephillip]

Now there is a credible source if I ever saw one!

You waiting to hear it from Bloody Bill O'Reilly?
"In an interview with Channel 2’s investigative news program 'Uvda,' Meir Dagan warned that by beating the drums of war, Netanyahu was putting Israel at risk of provoking Iran to strike preemptively.

"Dagan alluded to a fateful meeting during which he, then-Shin Bet head Yuval Diskin, and then-chief of the General Staff Gabi Ashkenazi met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then-defense minister Ehud Barak and other members of the cabinet in a Mossad club room to discuss the prospect of attacking Iran.

"During the meeting, all three of the security chiefs reportedly defied Netanyahu and Barak’s order that the military prepare for a solo strike on Iran, and eventually swayed several key ministers to their side.

Maybe Bill knows how many nuclear weapons Bibi has?

Read more: Former Mossad chief defends decision to defy Netanyahu on Iran | The Times of Israel Former Mossad chief defends decision to defy Netanyahu on Iran The Times of Israel
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

 

[suplex3000]

USA has been overtaken by Zionist hawks for decades. This is not some conspiracy as they'd have you believe.
Just do a little research on: USA financial institutions especially the Fed, key politicians and key White House personal and you'll soon realise it's the tail that wags the dog!

 

[Dot Com]

USA has been overtaken by Zionist hawks for decades. This is not some conspiracy as they'd have you believe.
Just do a little research on: USA financial institutions especially the Fed, key politicians and key White House personal and you'll soon realise it's the tail that wags the dog!

good post. Doesn't matter which party if you look at their staffs and who they appoint to key positions like the fed

 

[Steinlight]

USA has been overtaken by Zionist hawks for decades. This is not some conspiracy as they'd have you believe.
Just do a little research on: USA financial institutions especially the Fed, key politicians and key White House personal and you'll soon realise it's the tail that wags the dog!

good post. Doesn't matter which party if you look at their staffs and who they appoint to key positions like the fed

The Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve is Stanley Fischer, who was the Governor of the Bank of Israel from 2005 to 2013, but I am sure to say this is "antisemitic". Nothing fishy there at all.

Stanley "Stan" Fischer (Hebrew: סטנלי פישר‎; born October 15, 1943) is an economist and the vice chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve System. Born in Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia), he holds dual citizenship in Israel and the United States.[1] He served as governor of the Bank of Israel from 2005 to 2013. He previously served as chief economist at the World Bank.[2] On January 10, 2014, United States President Barack Obama nominated Fischer to be Vice-Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

Stanley Fischer - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Steinlight]

Apparently, Obama giving Israel 30 billion over this decade is "anti-Israel". To be a good underling, it looks like needs to kiss the feet of Netanyahu to prove he isn't an "antisemite" to the neoconservatives and zionists.

The Obameter Provide 30 billion over 10 years to Israel PolitiFact

 

[I.P.Freely]

Don't go away angry Just go away!!!

Israel was our best ally till Obama came along.

Did they fight with you in Iraq twat?
The current Potus is not anti Israel it is anti BiBi, read this you fool its in "big" for you
The White House is agitating in support of Binyamin Netanyahu’s opponents in next month’s Israeli election as his plan to attack Barack Obama’s Iran policy in an address to the US Congress continues to backfire on the Israeli prime minister.

The Obama administration has engineered a series of highly visible snubs of Netanyahu – from refusing a White House invitation and levelling accusations that the Israeli government is not trustworthy to a humiliating leak about new limitations on intelligence sharing – just weeks before the Israeli leader faces a tight general election.

Top administration officials, including Vice-President Joe Biden and the US secretary of state, John Kerry, have made a point of meeting Israeli opposition leaders who have seized on the dispute to characterise Netanyahu as jeopardising relations with Israel’s most important ally.

Biden, who is also president of the US Senate, and several Democratic members of Congress will be conspicuously absent from next week’s speech in which the Israeli prime minister is expected to effectively accuse Barack Obama of being duped by the Iranians in negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme and of endangering the existence of the Jewish state.

Aaron David Miller, who served six US secretaries of state as an adviser on Arab-Israeli negotiations, said the confrontation marks a further deterioration in an already dysfunctional relationship between Obama and Netanyahu. But Miller, who is now a vice-president at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said the Israeli leader’s divisive handling has handed the administration an opening “to try to demonstrate how much the US-Israeli relationship is dysfunctional at the top because of Netanyahu” and an opportunity to press for “regime change”.

“If you asked John Kerry and Obama privately who they wanted to see as the next prime minister of Israel, it wouldn’t be Netanyahu. They prefer the [Israeli opposition] Labour party. There’s no question about it. This invitation-gate, as I’m describing it, has created an opening for them,” he said.

That opening has been seized upon, Miller said, to try to embarrass Netanyahu before the Israeli electorate by portraying him as untrustworthy and endangering the Jewish state’s most important diplomatic relationship.

The White House is particularly incensed that the Israeli ambassador to Washington, Ron Dermer, and John Boehner, the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, conspired to arrange the speech to a joint sitting of Congress without consulting the administration. Democrats accuse Boehner of ambushing the president as the Republicans push – with the backing of the pro-Israel lobby in Washington – to strengthen sanctions against Iran, a move Obama has warned “will all but guarantee that diplomacy fails”.

But it was Dermer, who was born in the US and worked as a Republican political operative before moving to Israel, who instigated Netanyahu’s address to Congress.

Netanyahu has defended the speech as a legitimate attempt to stop Obama from making concessions to Iran that the Israeli leader said will leave Tehran on the brink of being able to build a nuclear weapon.

Democrats accuse Boehner of ambushing the president as the Republicans push – with the backing of the pro-Israel lobby in Washington – to strengthen sanctions against Iran. Photograph: AP
“I am going to the United States not because I seek a confrontation with the president but to speak up for the very survival of my country,” Netanyahu tweeted.

But Netanyahu’s warnings of an imminent threat from Iran, already treated with scepticism, will have been further undermined by revelations in the Guardian this week that Israel’s own intelligence service, Mossad, contradicted his claim to the United Nations in 2012 that Tehran was about a year away from constructing a nuclear weapon.

Leading Democrats have described the timing of the speech as an “outrageous” attempt by the Israeli prime minister to bolster his support in the 17 March parliamentary election as well as an attempt to provide ammunition for Republican attacks on Obama.

Last week, the White House made an unusually direct attack on the Israeli government, accusing it of dishonesty in selectively leaking information about the Iran nuclear talks to the Israeli press in an attempt to discredit the negotiations.

“We see that there is a continued practice of cherry-picking specific pieces of information and using them out of context to distort the negotiating position of the United States,” said the White House spokesman, Josh Earnest. “There’s no question that some of the things that the Israelis have said in characterising our negotiating position have not been accurate.”

That led the US not only to take the unusual step of limiting the intelligence it shares with Israel about the Iran talks but to embarrass Netanyahu by leaking the move.

Biden and Kerry met Israeli opposition leaders on the sidelines of a security conference in Germany in a clear snub to the Israeli prime minister. Netanyahu will address Congress with a conspicuously empty chair behind him as Biden is making a hurriedly arranged trip to South America. A small number of congresspeople have said they will boycott Netanyahu’s address.

“All of these things have been wilfully orchestrated,” said Miller. “Number one to demonstrate how upset they are by this invitation but, number two, to take advantage of that fact to demonstrate to the Israeli electorate that Netanyahu’s mismanaging it.”

Two leading Democratic senators, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Durbin, this week wrote to Netanyahu warning that his speech “threatens to undermine the important bipartisan approach towards Israel”.

“It sacrifices deep and well-established cooperation on Israel for short-term partisan points – something that should never be done with Israeli security and which we fear could have lasting repercussions,” the senators said in the letter.

Howard Dean, the former Democratic party chairman, was unusually strident for an American politician in describing the Israeli prime minister as a “disaster” earlier this month.

“I don’t trust Netanyahu. I think he’s not served Israel well,” he told MSNBC.

Opinion polls in Israel show the public divided on the address to Congress with widespread suspicion that Netanyahu is using it for electoral advantage. The Labour party leader, Isaac Herzog – campaigning in coalition with other opposition parties under the Zionist Union banner – has called Netanyahu’s speech a “strategic mistake”, and accused the prime minister of using it for his own “political interest”.

Zahava Gal-On, leader of the small leftwing Meretz party, accused the prime minister of “impairing” Israel’s relations with the US.

Netanyahu’s Likud party has fought back with a campaign advert that suggests that if modern Israel’s founder, David Ben Gurion, had listened to the US state department in 1948, the state would never have been born.

• Binyamin Netanyahu
  
• US politics
  
• John Boehner
  
• Israel
  
• Middle East and North Africa

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share via Email
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Google+

 

[Steinlight]

Don't go away angry Just go away!!!

Israel was our best ally till Obama came along.

Did they fight with you in Iraq twat?

No, but doesn't heavily lobbying for it count?

Pressure from Israel and the Lobby was not the only factor behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical. Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure. According to Philip Zelikow, a former member of the president's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, the executive director of the 9/11 Commission, and now a counsellor to Condoleezza Rice, the "real threat" from Iraq was not a threat to the United States.

The "unstated threat" was the "threat against Israel", Zelikow told an audience at the University of Virginia in September 2002. "The American government," he added, "doesn't want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell."

On 16 August 2002, 11 days before Dick Cheney kicked off the campaign for war with a hardline speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Washington Post reported that "Israel is urging US officials not to delay a military strike against Iraq's Saddam Hussein". By this point, according to Sharon, strategic co-ordination between Israel and the US had reached "unprecedented dimensions", and Israeli intelligence officials had given Washington a variety of alarming reports about Iraq's WMD programmes.

As one retired Israeli general later put it, "Israeli intelligence was a full partner to the picture presented by American and British intelligence regarding Iraq's non-conventional capabilities."

Israeli leaders were deeply distressed when Bush decided to seek Security Council authorisation for war, and even more worried when Saddam agreed to let UN inspectors back in. "The campaign against Saddam Hussein is a must," Shimon Peres told reporters in September 2002. "Inspections and inspectors are good for decent people, but dishonest people can overcome easily inspections and inspectors."

At the same time, Ehud Barak wrote a New York Times op-ed warning that "the greatest risk now lies in inaction". His predecessor as prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, published a similar piece in the Wall Street Journal, entitled: "The Case for Toppling Saddam". "Today nothing less than dismantling his regime will do," he declared. "I believe I speak for the overwhelming majority of Israelis in supporting a pre-emptive strike against Saddam's regime." Or as Ha'aretz reported in February 2003, "the military and political leadership yearns for war in Iraq".

What role did Israel play in the run-up to the Iraq war

 

[protectionist]

"A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012, that laid out a 'bottom line' assessment of Iran's nuclear work."

Now there is a credible source if I ever saw one!

HA HA. The OP has got to be kidding to come in here negating Netanyahu based on, of all things, an Al jazeera source.

EARTH TO OP: Recently, there have been reports about how Islamist (if not jihadist) al Jazeera has become. To rest any point about Iran and Israel on an al Jazeera source, is about like using CAIR as a source for discussion about free speech.

 

[protectionist]

Don't go away angry Just go away!!!

Israel was our best ally till Obama came along.

Did they fight with you in Iraq twat?
The current Potus is not anti Israel it is anti BiBi, read this you fool its in "big" for you
The White House is agitating in support of Binyamin Netanyahu’s opponents in next month’s Israeli election as his plan to attack Barack Obama’s Iran policy in an address to the US Congress continues to backfire on the Israeli prime minister.

The Obama administration has engineered a series of highly visible snubs of Netanyahu – from refusing a White House invitation and levelling accusations that the Israeli government is not trustworthy to a humiliating leak about new limitations on intelligence sharing – just weeks before the Israeli leader faces a tight general election.

Top administration officials, including Vice-President Joe Biden and the US secretary of state, John Kerry, have made a point of meeting Israeli opposition leaders who have seized on the dispute to characterise Netanyahu as jeopardising relations with Israel’s most important ally.

Biden, who is also president of the US Senate, and several Democratic members of Congress will be conspicuously absent from next week’s speech in which the Israeli prime minister is expected to effectively accuse Barack Obama of being duped by the Iranians in negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme and of endangering the existence of the Jewish state.

Aaron David Miller, who served six US secretaries of state as an adviser on Arab-Israeli negotiations, said the confrontation marks a further deterioration in an already dysfunctional relationship between Obama and Netanyahu. But Miller, who is now a vice-president at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said the Israeli leader’s divisive handling has handed the administration an opening “to try to demonstrate how much the US-Israeli relationship is dysfunctional at the top because of Netanyahu” and an opportunity to press for “regime change”.

“If you asked John Kerry and Obama privately who they wanted to see as the next prime minister of Israel, it wouldn’t be Netanyahu. They prefer the [Israeli opposition] Labour party. There’s no question about it. This invitation-gate, as I’m describing it, has created an opening for them,” he said.

That opening has been seized upon, Miller said, to try to embarrass Netanyahu before the Israeli electorate by portraying him as untrustworthy and endangering the Jewish state’s most important diplomatic relationship.

The White House is particularly incensed that the Israeli ambassador to Washington, Ron Dermer, and John Boehner, the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, conspired to arrange the speech to a joint sitting of Congress without consulting the administration. Democrats accuse Boehner of ambushing the president as the Republicans push – with the backing of the pro-Israel lobby in Washington – to strengthen sanctions against Iran, a move Obama has warned “will all but guarantee that diplomacy fails”.

But it was Dermer, who was born in the US and worked as a Republican political operative before moving to Israel, who instigated Netanyahu’s address to Congress.

Netanyahu has defended the speech as a legitimate attempt to stop Obama from making concessions to Iran that the Israeli leader said will leave Tehran on the brink of being able to build a nuclear weapon.

Democrats accuse Boehner of ambushing the president as the Republicans push – with the backing of the pro-Israel lobby in Washington – to strengthen sanctions against Iran. Photograph: AP
“I am going to the United States not because I seek a confrontation with the president but to speak up for the very survival of my country,” Netanyahu tweeted.

But Netanyahu’s warnings of an imminent threat from Iran, already treated with scepticism, will have been further undermined by revelations in the Guardian this week that Israel’s own intelligence service, Mossad, contradicted his claim to the United Nations in 2012 that Tehran was about a year away from constructing a nuclear weapon.

Leading Democrats have described the timing of the speech as an “outrageous” attempt by the Israeli prime minister to bolster his support in the 17 March parliamentary election as well as an attempt to provide ammunition for Republican attacks on Obama.

Last week, the White House made an unusually direct attack on the Israeli government, accusing it of dishonesty in selectively leaking information about the Iran nuclear talks to the Israeli press in an attempt to discredit the negotiations.

“We see that there is a continued practice of cherry-picking specific pieces of information and using them out of context to distort the negotiating position of the United States,” said the White House spokesman, Josh Earnest. “There’s no question that some of the things that the Israelis have said in characterising our negotiating position have not been accurate.”

That led the US not only to take the unusual step of limiting the intelligence it shares with Israel about the Iran talks but to embarrass Netanyahu by leaking the move.

Biden and Kerry met Israeli opposition leaders on the sidelines of a security conference in Germany in a clear snub to the Israeli prime minister. Netanyahu will address Congress with a conspicuously empty chair behind him as Biden is making a hurriedly arranged trip to South America. A small number of congresspeople have said they will boycott Netanyahu’s address.

“All of these things have been wilfully orchestrated,” said Miller. “Number one to demonstrate how upset they are by this invitation but, number two, to take advantage of that fact to demonstrate to the Israeli electorate that Netanyahu’s mismanaging it.”

Two leading Democratic senators, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Durbin, this week wrote to Netanyahu warning that his speech “threatens to undermine the important bipartisan approach towards Israel”.

“It sacrifices deep and well-established cooperation on Israel for short-term partisan points – something that should never be done with Israeli security and which we fear could have lasting repercussions,” the senators said in the letter.

Howard Dean, the former Democratic party chairman, was unusually strident for an American politician in describing the Israeli prime minister as a “disaster” earlier this month.

“I don’t trust Netanyahu. I think he’s not served Israel well,” he told MSNBC.

Opinion polls in Israel show the public divided on the address to Congress with widespread suspicion that Netanyahu is using it for electoral advantage. The Labour party leader, Isaac Herzog – campaigning in coalition with other opposition parties under the Zionist Union banner – has called Netanyahu’s speech a “strategic mistake”, and accused the prime minister of using it for his own “political interest”.

Zahava Gal-On, leader of the small leftwing Meretz party, accused the prime minister of “impairing” Israel’s relations with the US.

Netanyahu’s Likud party has fought back with a campaign advert that suggests that if modern Israel’s founder, David Ben Gurion, had listened to the US state department in 1948, the state would never have been born.

• Binyamin Netanyahu
  
• US politics
  
• John Boehner
  
• Israel
  
• Middle East and North Africa

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share via Email
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Google+

1. Nothing is backfiring.

2. Your citation of leading Democrats is a joke.

3.. You print is too large.

 

[Steinlight]

"A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012, that laid out a 'bottom line' assessment of Iran's nuclear work."

Now there is a credible source if I ever saw one!

HA HA. The OP has got to be kidding to come in here negating Netanyahu based on, of all things, an Al jazeera source.

EARTH TO OP: Recently, there have been reports about how Islamist (if not jihadist) al Jazeera has become. To rest any point about Iran and Israel on an al Jazeera source, is about like using CAIR as a source for discussion about free speech.

Al Jaazera is anti-Iranian, they are based out of Qatar, the fact you think they have a pro-Iranian bias, when the Arab Gulf States hate Iran, just shows how out of the loop you are geopolitically. You really have no idea what is going on, and just assume because they are a news source based in an Islamic country, they must like Iran or something. In reality, Saudi Arabia and Qatar want to continue these sanctions as much as Israel does, and view Iran as a rival power in the region. What Mossad said is a fact and has been verified by multiple western sources.

Leaked cables show Netanyahu s Iran bomb claim contradicted by Mossad World news The Guardian
BBC News - Israel PM differed with Mossad on Iran says report

I personally enjoy this infighting among these Israelis, it totally discredits their zionist project globally.

 

[I.P.Freely]

"A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012, that laid out a 'bottom line' assessment of Iran's nuclear work."

Now there is a credible source if I ever saw one!

HA HA. The OP has got to be kidding to come in here negating Netanyahu based on, of all things, an Al jazeera source.

EARTH TO OP: Recently, there have been reports about how Islamist (if not jihadist) al Jazeera has become. To rest any point about Iran and Israel on an al Jazeera source, is about like using CAIR as a source for discussion about free speech.

The cache, which has been independently authenticated by the Guardian, mainly involves exchanges between South Africa’s intelligence agency and its counterparts around the world. It is not the entire volume of traffic but a selective leak.

 

[protectionist]

"A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012, that laid out a 'bottom line' assessment of Iran's nuclear work."

Now there is a credible source if I ever saw one!

HA HA. The OP has got to be kidding to come in here negating Netanyahu based on, of all things, an Al jazeera source.

EARTH TO OP: Recently, there have been reports about how Islamist (if not jihadist) al Jazeera has become. To rest any point about Iran and Israel on an al Jazeera source, is about like using CAIR as a source for discussion about free speech.

Al Jaazera is anti-Iranian, they are based out of Qatar, the fact you think they have a pro-Iranian bias, when the Arab Gulf States hate Iran, just shows how out of the loop you are geopolitically. You really have no idea what is going on, and just assume because they are a news source based in an Islamic country, they must like Iran or something. In reality, Saudi Arabia and Qatar want to continue these sanctions as much as Israel does, and view Iran as a rival power in the region. What Mossad said is a fact and has been verified by multiple western sources.

Leaked cables show Netanyahu s Iran bomb claim contradicted by Mossad World news The Guardian
BBC News - Israel PM differed with Mossad on Iran says report

I personally enjoy this infighting among these Israelis, it totally discredits their zionist project globally.

I knew Saudi Arabia and Iran were not friendly with each other 35 years ago. And I didn't say al-Jazeera liked Iran. My comment was about al Jazeera and Israel. You are the one doing the assuming here, and not doing it very well.

 

[protectionist]

"A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012, that laid out a 'bottom line' assessment of Iran's nuclear work."

Now there is a credible source if I ever saw one!

HA HA. The OP has got to be kidding to come in here negating Netanyahu based on, of all things, an Al jazeera source.

EARTH TO OP: Recently, there have been reports about how Islamist (if not jihadist) al Jazeera has become. To rest any point about Iran and Israel on an al Jazeera source, is about like using CAIR as a source for discussion about free speech.

The cache, which has been independently authenticated by the Guardian, mainly involves exchanges between South Africa’s intelligence agency and its counterparts around the world. It is not the entire volume of traffic but a selective leak.

From what I read previously, you were resting your claims on al-Jazeera.

 

[Kondor3]

...

Isn't it great news, what we see on that map?

The Jewish Reconquista of the Eretz Yisrael is almost complete.

Pretty much like the Spaniards taking-back much of Spain from the Muslims after centuries of occupation, ending in 1492.

Then again, it's what the Muslim-Arabs of Palestine get, for running away in 1948, and failing to stand their ground; relying upon the broken promises of their Muslim-Arab neighbor-countries, to drown the Jews in the sea, and to take-back Old Palestine for them (more like, for Egypt and Syria - epic fail)...

The moral of the story of The Great Arab Skeddadle of 1948?

"He who pees his pants, then runs away, lives to regret it, for many a day."

It's over... it's been over for years... time for the Pals to pack up and leave... a baseball coin-toss "sucker's walk".

Nature has de-selected them.

Time to blend back into the surrounding Arab populations where they came from in the first place.

Nobody is going to miss them, or even notice, after a few years... no great loss.