New development in the shooting case of the black georgia jogger

[MacTheKnife]

Nonsense....watch the video....he had gone to the right around the truck then quickly veered left to attack...no shot was fired until he grabbed the gun. You are distorting the facts just like the msm.

don’t want to believe me - start the video Pause it with the sound on.

There is a frame where Arbery’s shadow on the ground disappears the split second the first shot is heard . THE SHOOTER IS IN FRONT OF 10 to 20 feet away
From THE TRUCK ON THE RIGHT SIDE
OF THE DOUBLE YELLOW LINE ARBERY IS IN FRONT OF THE TRUCK but closer to it when the First shot was fired .

You say the first shot was when both Ben were visible, that would be left of the double yellow like.

your version maintains that Gunman Jr did not cross the double yellow line, but hus white hat shows up seen through the windshield.

Gunman Jr moved to be further down the road and ahead of the jogger to block his oath. Junior did not stay put on the left side if the road that your version requires.

My photos told the better story but this will have to do.

Hesds are going to roll throughout the Police and DA departments because a simple
pause if the video in five spots tell a different story than the one you have to believe as a white extremist.

Somehow you have managed to deceive yourself.....when one watches the video...you need to pay attention to the black guy crossing over to the left...that can be observed through the window of the truck...and when the open door gets in the way you can see their position by looking down at where their feet are.

At no point was the gun pointed at the black dude before the fight started....you are essentially saying you believe the black guy was shot down in cold blood just because he was black...utter nonsense....if they wanted to shoot him they could have done that when they drove by him...and if they planned on shooting him they would not have called the police.

In a nutshell your opinion makes no sense. No logic to it whatsoever.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

By the way new video just posted close up showing video with Arbery wearing running shoes not work boots .

explain this to me then?

View attachment 334736

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

 

[progressive hunter]

Racist trash are going crazy on here in defence of their "God Given" right to lynch black folks.

Crazy leftist, anti-white, racist trash are going crazy in here, trying to spin a simple case of self-defense into a murder, and their "right" to jail white folks.

I wouldnt call it "SIMPLE",,,

the mcdaniels shouldnt have brought long guns guns to start with and kept any handguns put away until they were needed,,,

the didnt set a good example for gun owners,,,

I believe they are guilty of negligent homicide and nothing more,,,

 

[MacTheKnife]

Racist trash are going crazy on here in defence of their "God Given" right to lynch black folks.

Crazy leftist, anti-white, racist trash are going crazy in here, trying to spin a simple case of self-defense into a murder, and their "right" to jail white folks.

I wouldnt call it "SIMPLE",,,

the mcdaniels shouldnt have brought long guns guns to start with and kept any handguns put away until they were needed,,,

the didnt set a good example for gun owners,,,

I believe they are guilty of negligent homicide and nothing more,,,

Nonsense....nothing they did was illegal or negligent.....they took weapons because they knew they were going to confront a black criminal. Very prudent thing to do.

 

[progressive hunter]

Racist trash are going crazy on here in defence of their "God Given" right to lynch black folks.

Crazy leftist, anti-white, racist trash are going crazy in here, trying to spin a simple case of self-defense into a murder, and their "right" to jail white folks.

I wouldnt call it "SIMPLE",,,

the mcdaniels shouldnt have brought long guns guns to start with and kept any handguns put away until they were needed,,,

the didnt set a good example for gun owners,,,

I believe they are guilty of negligent homicide and nothing more,,,

Nonsense....nothing they did was illegal or negligent.....they took weapons because they knew they were going to confront a black criminal. Very prudent thing to do.

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

 

[MacTheKnife]

You can report it. But nobody can press charges except the owner or his representative. Also, and this is the difficult part. The person committing the crime has to refuse to leave when ordered to do so. Since no one ordered him, and he left, no crime. Sorry Charlie.

I find it strange that Georgia law would be so different from Florida law. I'm still tending to think that they are the same. In Florida, there are signs posted on construction sites, Serious crime to trespass there. And if caught, you get a no trespass warning. If you return, you go to jail.
SHOW in the statute where it says what you said.

Whereas I have no difficulty in either understanding that laws are different state to state. For example. In Georgia with my Carry License I can conceal about any weapon I want, so long as the weapon is legal. With Reciprocity I can carry in Florida with my Georgia license. But I have to obey Florida laws. I can also carry in Colorado, but the types of weapons are limited. Colorado has more restrictive laws than Georgia.

Some states allow right turn on Red. Other states do not. Let’s combine these two. Let’s say I carry my licensed weapon concealed into a business which has no guns allowed sign on the door. Believe it or not I have not committed a crime. If found the store employees can tell me to leave. As long as I depart when instructed to do so, I have not committed a crime. If I remain in defiance of the legal order. Then I have.

Georgia Concealed Carry Gun Laws: USCCA CCW Reciprocity Map

Last Updated 05/17/2021. Concealed Carry is legal with a permit at 21. Explore Georgia gun laws, Weapons Carry Licenses & CCW Reciprocity Map

www.usconcealedcarry.com

In Georgia it is perfectly legal to not inform the cop you are carrying concealed. It is dumb. But it is legal. Personally I keep my CWL behind my drivers license. I present both to the cop if I am stopped while armed. This way he knows and knows I am licensed to do so. The one time I did this for a minor fender bender the cop asked me to put the gun in my car and of course I did so. No problem and no citation was issued.

But back to Trespassing. If I am not committing a crime ignoring a no weapons sign what makes you think the cops are going to go hog wild if there is nothing stolen and no damage?

The reason for those with half a brain is that the paperwork will take longer than the guy is in jail. The last time I sat in Magistrates Court. I go every six months or so just to watch and listen. Call it a voyeur experience if you like. Sorry. The last time the two Trespassing cases were both no damage and were $100 plus court costs. Hardly worth the trouble.

in both cases the testimony was that the teenagers had been told to leave and when the cops checked back later found the kids had returned. Oh the location was a public park which was closed at night

Judging from my time being a voyeur in court Trespassing just does not have the priority.

Now Burglary has some priority. If Ahmad had stolen something it would be a bigger priority. But it would also be a felony case if enough value had been taken. But Ahmad had not stolen anything. No burglary reports in two months. What could he have stolen from a house under construction that was able to be concealed in shorts and a T shirt? Half a dozen bent nails?

The overreaction by the McMorons is the crime. Read the link. Aggravated Assault is pointing a weapon at someone loaded or not, so they are afraid of death or bodily harm. The only legal reason is if the weapon holder has a reasonable fear. In other words self defense.

Ahmad was the victim. Not because he was black. But because by the book the McMorons broke the law. If Ahmad had stopped and been detained for trespassing at gunpoint he could have filed charges of kidnapping against the McMorons since he did not commit any crimes other than possible Trespassing at the most.

The two videos that destroy all of the leftwingers arguments regarding this case.....you might want to save them....the powers that be are attempting to censor them aka delete them from the internet.

Video Shows Fatal Shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, Unarmed Black Man in Georgia

The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old unarmed black man, was caught on video and has prompted a grand jury investigation.

www.tmz.com

I love this. I have lived in Georgia for more than twenty years. My wife worked for lawyers as a Paralegal and I have talked with them from time to time. Even used them a time or two. But some dolt from somewhere else is going to tell me what Georgia law says and damn the folks in Georgia who actually know. Folks like lawyers and the like.

I guess he also tells Muslims how to worship, Hindu’s what their religion says. And otherwise is the subject matter expert right?

Let’s be real for a minute. The DA’s recused themselves. They essentially said they were unable to do their jobs because of a personal relationship. What that really means is they could not whitewash it or sweep it under the rug. Why? The McMorons lawyer released the video. That was just flat assed stupid. Dumber than a box of rocks.

But wait. It is getting worse for the McMorons every day.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8307457/New-surveillance-video-shows-Ahmaud-Arbery-entering-construction-site-leaving-handed.html?ITO=applenews

The owners of the house never contacted the McMorons. They did not condone the McMorons going after the “trespasser”. In other words. The guy stole nothing. He looked around. No construction boots. Low shoes. Most likely sneakers or running shoes.

But the McMorons took the law into their own hands. That has a term. Vigilante.

But why is the attitude of the owners important? Because in Georgia only the owners or their representatives can press charges for Trespassing. In other words the McMorons has no legal authority to stop or detain Ahmad. This is why the local Prosecutors passed in the case. They could not bring themselves to prosecute a friend.

The more that comes out the worse the McMorons look. I would be saying exactly the same thing if Ahmad was Arnold and was blinding white and the McMorons were black. That is why Citizens Arrest is so tricky. You can’t just think you are right. You have to be 100% certain. Otherwise it is you who is going to jail. In Georgia the charges would be kidnapping. That is what it is called when you use force to illegally prevent someone from leaving.

Of course “kidnapping” is not overly relevant right now, but I found it interesting Arbery’s fsmily Lawyers yesterday used the term “ambushed” yesterday.

On Saturday I posted still images from the video showing the positions of the shooter and the victims coinciding with the First Shot being fired which was out of view.

doing that sheds new light on the fact that Arbery was trying to avoid the shotgun holding gunman on the left side of the truck as he as he approached by choosing to go around to his the right on the passenger side.

The older Gunman was standing in the bed of the truck with I-Phone getting ready to film the hijacking - kidnapping. He must have been certain Arbery was not armed to have put his gun down standing in such a vulnerable position.

White extremists here say that for some insane reason Arbery turned hard left at the front of the truck and attacked the gunman with the shotgun who was standing left of the center line of the road so the Gunman had to shoot the killer burglar in self defense .

its all a right wing lie.

the First Shot was fired when a Gunman’s white hat could could be seen through the windshield as he was well across the double yellow line when he fired the first shot from I believe ten to twenty feet beyond the front of the truck.

this means the shot gun was not left of the double yellow line when it was fired the first time - it was to the Right in a position to cut off Arbery as he tried to Pass.

The shotgun was being positioned to block whatever path Arbery took to force him to stop or force him to go onto private property.

Arbery only tried to get the shotgun after one shot was fired. That first contact was made left of the double Yellow line. The second shot is fired when both men are out of view completely off the road to the left of the screen.

The first shot was when Arbery and Gunman were on the right side of the road. The older Gunman was holding his phone when the first shot was fired looking straight ahead not to the left:


This is cold blooded murder, anbush and attempted kidnapping all rolled up into one.

Absolute rubbish....you can plainly see in the video that the white guy's feet barely crosses the yellow line in the middle of the road........at the time of the first shot the shooters feet are just slightly to the right of the yellow line...the black guy approaches that point very quickly...a mili-second after the shot the black guy has his foot on the yellow line which means he ran from the right side of the road to the middle of the road to attack the white guy with the shot-gun.

Video Shows Fatal Shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, Unarmed Black Man in Georgia

The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old unarmed black man, was caught on video and has prompted a grand jury investigation.

www.tmz.com

 

[protectionist]

You can report it. But nobody can press charges except the owner or his representative. Also, and this is the difficult part. The person committing the crime has to refuse to leave when ordered to do so. Since no one ordered him, and he left, no crime. Sorry Charlie.

I find it strange that Georgia law would be so different from Florida law. I'm still tending to think that they are the same. In Florida, there are signs posted on construction sites, Serious crime to trespass there. And if caught, you get a no trespass warning. If you return, you go to jail.
SHOW in the statute where it says what you said.

Whereas I have no difficulty in either understanding that laws are different state to state. For example. In Georgia with my Carry License I can conceal about any weapon I want, so long as the weapon is legal. With Reciprocity I can carry in Florida with my Georgia license. But I have to obey Florida laws. I can also carry in Colorado, but the types of weapons are limited. Colorado has more restrictive laws than Georgia.

Some states allow right turn on Red. Other states do not. Let’s combine these two. Let’s say I carry my licensed weapon concealed into a business which has no guns allowed sign on the door. Believe it or not I have not committed a crime. If found the store employees can tell me to leave. As long as I depart when instructed to do so, I have not committed a crime. If I remain in defiance of the legal order. Then I have.

Georgia Concealed Carry Gun Laws: USCCA CCW Reciprocity Map

Last Updated 05/17/2021. Concealed Carry is legal with a permit at 21. Explore Georgia gun laws, Weapons Carry Licenses & CCW Reciprocity Map

www.usconcealedcarry.com

In Georgia it is perfectly legal to not inform the cop you are carrying concealed. It is dumb. But it is legal. Personally I keep my CWL behind my drivers license. I present both to the cop if I am stopped while armed. This way he knows and knows I am licensed to do so. The one time I did this for a minor fender bender the cop asked me to put the gun in my car and of course I did so. No problem and no citation was issued.

But back to Trespassing. If I am not committing a crime ignoring a no weapons sign what makes you think the cops are going to go hog wild if there is nothing stolen and no damage?

The reason for those with half a brain is that the paperwork will take longer than the guy is in jail. The last time I sat in Magistrates Court. I go every six months or so just to watch and listen. Call it a voyeur experience if you like. Sorry. The last time the two Trespassing cases were both no damage and were $100 plus court costs. Hardly worth the trouble.

in both cases the testimony was that the teenagers had been told to leave and when the cops checked back later found the kids had returned. Oh the location was a public park which was closed at night

Judging from my time being a voyeur in court Trespassing just does not have the priority.

Now Burglary has some priority. If Ahmad had stolen something it would be a bigger priority. But it would also be a felony case if enough value had been taken. But Ahmad had not stolen anything. No burglary reports in two months. What could he have stolen from a house under construction that was able to be concealed in shorts and a T shirt? Half a dozen bent nails?

The overreaction by the McMorons is the crime. Read the link. Aggravated Assault is pointing a weapon at someone loaded or not, so they are afraid of death or bodily harm. The only legal reason is if the weapon holder has a reasonable fear. In other words self defense.

Ahmad was the victim. Not because he was black. But because by the book the McMorons broke the law. If Ahmad had stopped and been detained for trespassing at gunpoint he could have filed charges of kidnapping against the McMorons since he did not commit any crimes other than possible Trespassing at the most.

The two videos that destroy all of the leftwingers arguments regarding this case.....you might want to save them....the powers that be are attempting to censor them aka delete them from the internet.

Video Shows Fatal Shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, Unarmed Black Man in Georgia

The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old unarmed black man, was caught on video and has prompted a grand jury investigation.

www.tmz.com

I love this. I have lived in Georgia for more than twenty years. My wife worked for lawyers as a Paralegal and I have talked with them from time to time. Even used them a time or two. But some dolt from somewhere else is going to tell me what Georgia law says and damn the folks in Georgia who actually know. Folks like lawyers and the like.

I guess he also tells Muslims how to worship, Hindu’s what their religion says. And otherwise is the subject matter expert right?

Let’s be real for a minute. The DA’s recused themselves. They essentially said they were unable to do their jobs because of a personal relationship. What that really means is they could not whitewash it or sweep it under the rug. Why? The McMorons lawyer released the video. That was just flat assed stupid. Dumber than a box of rocks.

But wait. It is getting worse for the McMorons every day.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8307457/New-surveillance-video-shows-Ahmaud-Arbery-entering-construction-site-leaving-handed.html?ITO=applenews

The owners of the house never contacted the McMorons. They did not condone the McMorons going after the “trespasser”. In other words. The guy stole nothing. He looked around. No construction boots. Low shoes. Most likely sneakers or running shoes.

But the McMorons took the law into their own hands. That has a term. Vigilante.

But why is the attitude of the owners important? Because in Georgia only the owners or their representatives can press charges for Trespassing. In other words the McMorons has no legal authority to stop or detain Ahmad. This is why the local Prosecutors passed in the case. They could not bring themselves to prosecute a friend.

The more that comes out the worse the McMorons look. I would be saying exactly the same thing if Ahmad was Arnold and was blinding white and the McMorons were black. That is why Citizens Arrest is so tricky. You can’t just think you are right. You have to be 100% certain. Otherwise it is you who is going to jail. In Georgia the charges would be kidnapping. That is what it is called when you use force to illegally prevent someone from leaving.

Of course “kidnapping” is not overly relevant right now, but I found it interesting Arbery’s fsmily Lawyers yesterday used the term “ambushed” yesterday.

On Saturday I posted still images from the video showing the positions of the shooter and the victims coinciding with the First Shot being fired which was out of view.

doing that sheds new light on the fact that Arbery was trying to avoid the shotgun holding gunman on the left side of the truck as he as he approached by choosing to go around to his the right on the passenger side.

The older Gunman was standing in the bed of the truck with I-Phone getting ready to film the hijacking - kidnapping. He must have been certain Arbery was not armed to have put his gun down standing in such a vulnerable position.

White extremists here say that for some insane reason Arbery turned hard left at the front of the truck and attacked the gunman with the shotgun who was standing left of the center line of the road so the Gunman had to shoot the killer burglar in self defense .

its all a right wing lie.

the First Shot was fired when a Gunman’s white hat could could be seen through the windshield as he was well across the double yellow line when he fired the first shot from I believe ten to twenty feet beyond the front of the truck.

this means the shot gun was not left of the double yellow line when it was fired the first time - it was to the Right in a position to cut off Arbery as he tried to Pass.

The shotgun was being positioned to block whatever path Arbery took to force him to stop or force him to go onto private property.

Arbery only tried to get the shotgun after one shot was fired. That first contact was made left of the double Yellow line. The second shot is fired when both men are out of view completely off the road to the left of the screen.

The first shot was when Arbery and Gunman were on the right side of the road. The older Gunman was holding his phone when the first shot was fired looking straight ahead not to the left:


This is cold blooded murder, ambush and attempted kidnapping all rolled up into one.

You are talking utter nonsense. You're fabricating a scenario about a thing that nobody was able to see, because of the large truck blocking the view. Instead of your novel little twist, McMicheal could easily have been standing on the driver side in front of the truck, with Arbery a good 5 feet away from him, nobody blocking anybody.

Being that all this was out of view of the camera, you also have no ability to claim that "Arbery only tried to get the shotgun after one shot was fired" Nonsense! Just as easily (actually even more easily) it could have been that Arbery simply make a quick left turn when he saw the shotgun, and lunged at McMicheal, who is seen going backwards, with the entire rest of the video showing Arbery aggressively attacking McMicheal, and punching him. Also, contrary to your fairy tale, McMichaels shotgun was NOT "in a position to cut off Arbery as he tried to pass". Your own statement about McMicheals' hat proves that, as it can be seen to the left (drivers side) of the roof brake light, showing that McMichaels was a good 5 feet away from the passenger side of the truck, where Arbery was running, and he was a few feet from the truck as well, adding to the 5 foot distance. He was at least 6 feet from McMichaels, with nothing blocking his path.

Perhaps Arbery made a bad spur of the moment decision, to go at McMicheal, thinking that McMichaels might shoot him in the back, after he passed by the truck. Whatever. No one will ever know the answer to that, but we do know that you are obviously concocting a story here, and arranging the scene to exactly how you wish it to be.

This is a computer forum and you are a poster, not a movie where you are the director.

 

[progressive hunter]

Racist trash are going crazy on here in defence of their "God Given" right to lynch black folks.

Crazy leftist, anti-white, racist trash are going crazy in here, trying to spin a simple case of self-defense into a murder, and their "right" to jail white folks.

I wouldnt call it "SIMPLE",,,

the mcdaniels shouldnt have brought long guns guns to start with and kept any handguns put away until they were needed,,,

the didnt set a good example for gun owners,,,

I believe they are guilty of negligent homicide and nothing more,,,

Nonsense....nothing they did was illegal or negligent.....they took weapons because they knew they were going to confront a black criminal. Very prudent thing to do.

I'm not sure what him being black had to d with it,,,they suspected he was a criminal adding black into it gives the racist something to discredit you with,,,

 

[protectionist]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[progressive hunter]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

 

[MacTheKnife]

By the way new video just posted close up showing video with Arbery wearing running shoes not work boots .

explain this to me then?

View attachment 334736

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

The GBI is under control of politicians in Atlanta...aka nigah town....they will do whatever they can to lynch the two white guys.....the question is how much power can they exert in the small town of Brunswick, Ga.?

 

[jc456]

Nonsense....watch the video....he had gone to the right around the truck then quickly veered left to attack...no shot was fired until he grabbed the gun. You are distorting the facts just like the msm.

don’t want to believe me - start the video Pause it with the sound on.

There is a frame where Arbery’s shadow on the ground disappears the split second the first shot is heard . THE SHOOTER IS IN FRONT OF 10 to 20 feet away
From THE TRUCK ON THE RIGHT SIDE
OF THE DOUBLE YELLOW LINE ARBERY IS IN FRONT OF THE TRUCK but closer to it when the First shot was fired .

You say the first shot was when both Ben were visible, that would be left of the double yellow like.

your version maintains that Gunman Jr did not cross the double yellow line, but hus white hat shows up seen through the windshield.

Gunman Jr moved to be further down the road and ahead of the jogger to block his oath. Junior did not stay put on the left side if the road that your version requires.

My photos told the better story but this will have to do.

Hesds are going to roll throughout the Police and DA departments because a simple
pause if the video in five spots tell a different story than the one you have to believe as a white extremist.

post your still of that position. I can post different. from that video. why do you fks think you can just lie when evidence is there. no shot is fired until the black man grabs the gun. 22 second mark. and they are almost on the double yellow line, the struggle continues and two more shots go off. the third while the black man has his hand on the barrel and holding the barrel in his own mid section. Now post the stills that differ with that part of the video.

 

[jc456]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

says nothing. they aren't guilty of anything.

 

[MacTheKnife]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

Ridiculous......they are in jail because of poltics....not for anything they did. Politicians in Atlanta control the GBI.

No ones life was in danger until the black decided to attack....the black guy placed everyone's life in danger including his own....if he had managed to get control of the shot-gun when he assaulted the white guy he could have used it to kill both white guys and maybe even himself since it has been shown he had mental problems.

 

[progressive hunter]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

says nothing. they aren't guilty of anything.

thats not for you or me to decide,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

Ridiculous......they are in jail because of poltics....not for anything they did. Politicians in Atlanta control the GBI.

No ones life was in danger until the black decided to attack....the black guy placed everyone's life in danger including his own....if he had managed to get control of the shot-gun when he assaulted the white guy he could have used it to kill both white guys and maybe even himself since it has been shown he had mental problems.

so you admit they werent in danger when they fist pulled their guns,,,

like I said they set a bad example for gun owners,,,

 

[jc456]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

says nothing. they aren't guilty of anything.

thats not for you or me to decide,,,

exactly. so they are not guilty of anything yet. right?

 

[jc456]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

Ridiculous......they are in jail because of poltics....not for anything they did. Politicians in Atlanta control the GBI.

No ones life was in danger until the black decided to attack....the black guy placed everyone's life in danger including his own....if he had managed to get control of the shot-gun when he assaulted the white guy he could have used it to kill both white guys and maybe even himself since it has been shown he had mental problems.

so you admit they werent in danger when they fist pulled their guns,,,

like I said they set a bad example for gun owners,,,

they didn't do anything wrong.

 

[progressive hunter]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

Ridiculous......they are in jail because of poltics....not for anything they did. Politicians in Atlanta control the GBI.

No ones life was in danger until the black decided to attack....the black guy placed everyone's life in danger including his own....if he had managed to get control of the shot-gun when he assaulted the white guy he could have used it to kill both white guys and maybe even himself since it has been shown he had mental problems.

so you admit they werent in danger when they fist pulled their guns,,,

like I said they set a bad example for gun owners,,,

they didn't do anything wrong.

thanks for your opinion,,,,

 

[jc456]

I didnt say they shouldnt have taken them,,,just that there was no reason to pull them out,,,
everything else they did was justified,,,

Of course there was a reason to pull them out. For self-defense, as the events clearly proved. What good is a gun sitting inside a truck, when you are outside ? That makes no sense whatsoever.

them sitting in jail right now facing murder chargers says otherwise,,,,

and based on the events being in broad daylight and no proof their lives were in danger just adds to their guilt,,,

Ridiculous......they are in jail because of poltics....not for anything they did. Politicians in Atlanta control the GBI.

No ones life was in danger until the black decided to attack....the black guy placed everyone's life in danger including his own....if he had managed to get control of the shot-gun when he assaulted the white guy he could have used it to kill both white guys and maybe even himself since it has been shown he had mental problems.

so you admit they werent in danger when they fist pulled their guns,,,

like I said they set a bad example for gun owners,,,

they didn't do anything wrong.

thanks for your opinion,,,,

it's the constitution.