New Poll Finds CNN Far Less Believable Cable Channel Than Fox News

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2011
170,170
47,321
2,180
It used to be that whenever an important news story broke, cable television viewers would quickly turn to CNN for must-see coverage of what was happening. However, according to a poll conducted regarding the five-day coverage of the Boston Marathon bombing, that is definitely no longer the case.

The survey, which was conducted by the liberal Huffington Post website and the international marketing agency YouGov, determined that former titan CNN came in as far less trustworthy than Fox News over which was the most believable cable news channel.

During the poll, which was based on interviews of 1,000 adults last Friday and Saturday, the bad news for CNN began when people were asked how believable the news was from that channel during the Boston bombings. The biggest response was 35 percent stating “I don't watch CNN.”

Of course, all cable news outlets saw their viewership rise sharply because of their coverage of the bombing and subsequent search for the terrorists behind it.

As a result, 38 percent of the respondents said the channel was “very” or “somewhat” believable, and 21 percent said it was “not very” or “not at all believable.”

Also, MSNBC had no reason to smile since the poll indicated that 42 percent of the people polled “don't watch” the channel. In addition, the liberal channel fared poorly in the “very” or “somewhat” believable category with 35 percent.

However, the survey brought good news for the Fox News Channel, which had a 50 percent rating in the categories of “very” and “somewhat” believable even though 28 percent of those polled said they don't watch the cable news outlet, which is far less than its competitors.

Read more: New Poll Finds CNN Far Less Believable Cable Channel Than Fox News | NewsBusters
 
and you cite a source that clearly and largely states "Exposing and combating liberal media bias".

Doesn't that make them intentionally biased?






You right wing loons... :cuckoo:
 
and you cite a source that clearly and largely states "Exposing and combating liberal media bias".

Doesn't that make them intentionally biased?






You right wing loons... :cuckoo:

Not when they are citing a poll done by HuffPo. You left wing moonbats, read the links next time instead of summarily dismissing them.

:eusa_whistle:
 
According to newsbusters? :lol: What the hell is wrong with you?

Remember that famous story about Colin Powell telling CIA handlers that he wasn't going to say certain things at the UN? You have to wonder what bripat's standards are (assuming he has any).

That being said, there are scant differences in the NEWS from Fox to MSNBC to CNN. The blatant falsehoods on FOX during their non-news shows make it the joke that it is. Most can tell the difference I think; however many cannot...and they all seem to post here. :razz:
 
and look at the "Leaving And Fired" trend for CNN/MSNBC has dealt with for years. I never knew why Cluntessa Brewher left MSNBC a few years back, maybe it's cause of all of her blooper moments, ruined her reputation as a "Normal Human Being"? CNN's better anchors are long gone, some went to FOX. After Mike Barnes died, they seemed to have split up. Rick Standchez was fired, yet he was pretty good. MSNBC can't even maintain a decent host for the 6pm spot. The last few{and current one} are and have been a total embarrassment for the station. And to this day no one can pronounce that fired&pathetic POS dudes name {Czenk?}. (sent off to current TV (4000 viewers).
 

Forum List

Back
Top