When you make comments like 'Martin was a thug punk thief, probably....' you lose any intelligence high ground. 'Probably'? WTF does that mean? It means you don't fucking know.... if you don't know, then you are equally as stupid as those who insist that Zimmerman attacked Martin.
Being facetious. They call Zimmerman a racist, he was told to stop by police, he is guiltyand he shot an unarmed boy minding his own business and I call Martin a punk thug thief.
ALL THOSE claims are absurd.
Read all of my other posts. I was the first one to say that possibly Martin could ALSO invoke the stand my ground statute if Zimmerman had the gun and pointed it at him. Martin could have felt in danger of his life and then attacked Zimmerman.
We do not know but the witness states Martin hit him in the back of the head.
My mind is not made up. I have heard none of the witnesses and not seen ANY evidence.
NO ONE else has either.
So you're using the 'Mommy, he did it too' excuse? Hmmm.
Nope, that is never valid and I never do that.
Your analogy would only be valid if I believed those possibilities had ANY validity in the facts of this case.
Zimmerman could be a racist that steals his grandmothers' social security checks and it would have NO bearing on the facts of this case.
"He called Martin a coon" so he is guilty according to them.
"Martin is a punk, thug thief" so he is guilty of attacking Zimmerman I SARCASTICALLY (facetious definition) stated.
Look up the definition of facetious if you need further help. Sarcasm.
Your analogy is wanting to prove a truth. WE DO NOT KNOW THE TRUTH IN THIS.
As I have stated 100 times, MY MIND IS NOT MADE UP.
Maybe you have made yours up but NONE of the witnesses and evidence has been presented. Stay tuned and you just may learn something.