Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He really should. It’ll be like dangling bait on hook. CNN and MSNBC are pretending like the film doesn’t exist.It’s amazing how liberals all think alike. They always agree with each other and oppose anything conservatives support. In this case, calling out Kitty Porn.
I can’t find an article from CNN or MSNBC condemning or even mentioning “Cuties”.
the few leftists news sources that do discuss Cuties, defend the film with the same talking points that the Liberals here argue (misunderstanding the point of the film or they bring up Beauty Pageants).
Liberals cannot think for themselves and repeat their group think talking points. Without twitter and the mainstream news, their heads would have 0 thoughts. A bunch of air heads and zombies.
I’m hoping one day CNN publishes an article encouraging people to jump off bridges.
Trump should come out against it. We're solve overpopulation and achieve political and cultural unity is a matter of days.
The rivers might be disgusting for a while. But it would be worth it.
Problem is that Trump put on pagents of half naked underage girls for entertainment so he doesn’t exactly have a lot of credibility here.It’s amazing how liberals all think alike. They always agree with each other and oppose anything conservatives support. In this case, calling out Kitty Porn.
I can’t find an article from CNN or MSNBC condemning or even mentioning “Cuties”.
the few leftists news sources that do discuss Cuties, defend the film with the same talking points that the Liberals here argue (misunderstanding the point of the film or they bring up Beauty Pageants).
Liberals cannot think for themselves and repeat their group think talking points. Without twitter and the mainstream news, their heads would have 0 thoughts. A bunch of air heads and zombies.
I’m hoping one day CNN publishes an article encouraging people to jump off bridges.
Trump should come out against it. We're solve overpopulation and achieve political and cultural unity is a matter of days.
The rivers might be disgusting for a while. But it would be worth it.
So you don’t know what you’re talking about then. Films don’t create a message by fading to black.Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
Decades of observation on how you liberals think and act. And of course a number of stills and clips from the movie and reviews by trusted youtubers who did watch it, to their disgust.
So in other words, you don't actually know, you just took the word of people who's livelihood is to stoke controversy?
Seems like you just admitted this comes from a place of ignorance. Still and clips divorced from context to prove a point is a really shitty way of coming to a conclusion.
I'm aware that the children are dressed and acting like strippers in several scenes. I'm aware that one child finds a used rubber and blows it up with her mouth.
You can make a point about, even AGAINST the sexualization of children, without that shit.
FADE TO BLACK.
That is all it takes. Maybe your film won't be generate as much buzz. Maybe you won't be called "stunning and brave" on twitter.
But you also don't have to teach children how to act like strippers either.
You are defending kiddie porn.
So if I have a problem with Nazis killing Jews, then I’m a Nazi?So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
Saying that the movie isn’t defending pedophilia, just like Schindler’s list wasn’t defending the holocaust even if some anti-Semites out there might have enjoyed seeing Jews be murdered.So if I have a problem with Nazis killing Jews, then I’m a Nazi?So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
Besides for trying to defend pedophilia, what are you trying to say?
how about we just start calling you Harvey,,,Saying that the movie isn’t defending pedophilia, just like Schindler’s list wasn’t defending the holocaust.So if I have a problem with Nazis killing Jews, then I’m a Nazi?So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
Besides for trying to defend pedophilia, what are you trying to say?
So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
So how do you see it for what it is if you’ve never seen it?OK harvey,,,So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
sorry I'm not a pervert that watchs child porn,,,
I did. And it’s worse than what I had imagined.So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
Harvey I know its got half naked little girls playing with themselves,,I dont get off on that kind of stuff like you do,,,So how do you see it for what it is if you’ve never seen it?OK harvey,,,So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
sorry I'm not a pervert that watchs child porn,,,
Why did you watch it and what did you think about it?I did. And it’s worse than what I had imagined.So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
answer this question since all you have done is defend child porn here
do you condemn the film “Cuties”?
I think you don’t actually know anything you think you know.Harvey I know its got half naked little girls playing with themselves,,I dont get off on that kind of stuff like you do,,,So how do you see it for what it is if you’ve never seen it?OK harvey,,,So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
sorry I'm not a pervert that watchs child porn,,,
what are you up to 10 times??
he just told you dumbass,,,Why did you watch it and what did you think about it?I did. And it’s worse than what I had imagined.So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
answer this question since all you have done is defend child porn here
do you condemn the film “Cuties”?
Problem is that Trump put on pagents of half naked underage girls for entertainment so he doesn’t exactly have a lot of credibility here.It’s amazing how liberals all think alike. They always agree with each other and oppose anything conservatives support. In this case, calling out Kitty Porn.
I can’t find an article from CNN or MSNBC condemning or even mentioning “Cuties”.
the few leftists news sources that do discuss Cuties, defend the film with the same talking points that the Liberals here argue (misunderstanding the point of the film or they bring up Beauty Pageants).
Liberals cannot think for themselves and repeat their group think talking points. Without twitter and the mainstream news, their heads would have 0 thoughts. A bunch of air heads and zombies.
I’m hoping one day CNN publishes an article encouraging people to jump off bridges.
Trump should come out against it. We're solve overpopulation and achieve political and cultural unity is a matter of days.
The rivers might be disgusting for a while. But it would be worth it.
Was I talking to you?he just told you dumbass,,,Why did you watch it and what did you think about it?I did. And it’s worse than what I had imagined.So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
answer this question since all you have done is defend child porn here
do you condemn the film “Cuties”?
sorry Harvey,,,
Uh, you brought Trump into this.I don't know why you are bringing Trump into this. I guess, everything else didn't work?
Trump should come out against it.
I watched it because I wanted to see if the outrage was all it was made out to be. I found it to be worse. I didn’t know that 11 year old girls took selfies of their vaginas, took pictures of a grown mans penis and played with condoms.Why did you watch it and what did you think about it?I did. And it’s worse than what I had imagined.So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
answer this question since all you have done is defend child porn here
do you condemn the film “Cuties”?
yes you were,,,Was I talking to you?he just told you dumbass,,,Why did you watch it and what did you think about it?I did. And it’s worse than what I had imagined.So you did see the movie?I see it for what it is,,,child porn,,,,So the filmmaker sees it as a statement against oversexualization of minors but you can only see it from the eyes of a pervert?what its about doesnt matter,,its a pedo's dream movie,,,and only pedos would defend having little girls half naked and playing with themselves,,my god you perverts are dense,,,But that’s the point. It’s not promoting child porn. It’s taking on the problems with oversexualization of minors. You guys have a hard time seeing things in anything but black and white.its intent is irrelevant when they promoting child porn,,,Pretty self centered about you to think anyone who made this movie did anything because of the right.No, not all scenes are intended to be seen as sexy by the viewing audience. In fact, the scenes of dancing by the girls in the movie are supposed to make people uncomfortable.Because you guys are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you’re talking about.If you haven’t seen it, your opinion is uninformed.I think a lot of people are attacking this movie without actually having seen it.I don’t support beauty pageants and think they’re wierd but at least beauty pageants don’t pretend to stoke and suck cocks and pretend to get fucked up the ass.This movie is getting quite the buzz around here but how is it any worse than those sickening child beauty pageants?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
Why don’t you watch the movie before commenting on it?
I’ll leave the watching of child pornography to your kind.
And we will leave the defending of it, to yours.
If they had seen the movie, they might understand the message of the movie is very opposed to over sexualization of young girls.
Yeah, I've heard that excuse. Doesn't fly. I've seen enough and I will not be watching it, because I already regret having seen as much as I have already seen.
IF your message was ANTI-pedophilia, you don't have to show children acting like professional strippers. You could show them getting the job and then fade to black and make the point, without putting the child actresses though the simulated sex acts and without giving pedos their jollies,
and then have them talk about it, with each other, or with their parents, or a social worker,
or show the effects on them, or show the type of low life scum that shows up to watch them...
and that is just off the top of my head. I would hope that a professional film maker could do better than I could.
Though with the shit that hollywood has been producing, maybe not.
I've seen enough. I've never committed a bank robbery, but I have an informed opposition to it.
Your excuses and rationalizations for defending kiddie porn are getting more and more desperate.
Why are you doing this? Are you really so soulless that you can't part with the mob, even on kiddie porn?
Platoon was an effective anti-war movie because it portrays horrors and tragedies of the Vietnam war.
The actors playing the roles were adults.
When an actor pretends to shot someone, he is not actually committing violence, no one is hurt.
When an actress acts sexy, she might not be having actual sex, but she is behaving in a sexy manner and is certainly being seen as sexy by the viewing audience. .
YOur refusal to admit what we all know, is you trying to gaslight, in defense of kiddie porn.
That is you... reaching a new low, even for liberals.
Not buying it. They push the boundaries, so that when people speak out against it, they can say "patriarchy" and be "stunning and brave", and have an excuse to talk shit about people on the Right, and if the cost is that they have to make kiddie porn, well, you guys seem fine with that.
What makes you so confident in your assessment of the movie and it’s intent if you’ve never seen it?
but a pervert like you wouldnt understand,,,
Oh, and don’t forget that it gives you something to complain about as a political statement.
And why would anyone believe your description of the movie given that you admitted you've never seen it?
its joe bidens dream movie,,,
this guy also made movies,,,
View attachment 388330
answer this question since all you have done is defend child porn here
do you condemn the film “Cuties”?
sorry Harvey,,,
