Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,200
- 2,635
Why should I care what Carlson thinks?By what I saw on Tucker Carlson when reported on the thing, uhhh I'm guessing at the minimum it was "child exploitation", and this was due to the actions and clothes that the young girls were required to wear or act like in those clothes, and this opinion was being drawn upon the reviewing of the reported clips that were shown on Tucker Carlson while I watched his show. Wouldn't "child exploitation" lead to worse things sadly enough ?? These things involving children are unexceptable in a civilized society. If laws were broken, I hope that the adults are prosecuted to the fullest extent of our laws if were being broken in these ways."It is that the poster's in here are either defending child exploitation or not"It is that the poster's in here are either defending child exploitation or not (i.e. when visting the OP in order to debate it), and hopefully all who visit will suggest solutions to the issue's talked about here, and not just go about trying to deflect or derail by attacking the good poster's who are seeking solutions to all the madness today.... Now which is it with you ???....Pointing out rightards are in no position to define morals is defending it?Oh and your morals are somehow sound while you are in here defending "Cuties" eh ???
Could be that you are just being a troll.(feeding your ego)...... If you are trolling, then you should be reported for trolling in my opinion.
Attacking poster's instead of debating the OP in a constructive manor with them, is basically trolling........ If inviting attacks just so you can attack again, also makes you a troll. Trolling is against the rules.
That's complete and utter bullshit. It's also that some, like myself who haven't seen it, claim rightards are overreacting and that it's not actually child pornography based on there being no attempts by the Justice Department to get it taken down. That's not defending the movie; as I can't having not seen it. It's pointing out that rightards are ... well ... rightards.
