Newest AGW bomb: "Lightning strikes will get you!!"

Gore.......... "Artic ice will disappear by 2013"

In 2013, the polar ice cap was growing faster than Mammooth running from a pug during a jog!!!!



This religion is nothing but a huge fraud.
 
Last edited:
After Huricane Katrina, every single global warming nutter on here ranted and raved about how hurricanes were going to increase in size and strength due to global warming!!!

Fucking frauds................:Boom2:

By 2012............they are at RECORD LOWS!!!!!


Global Hurricane Activity At Near Record Low The Global Warming Policy Forum GWPF



These people are wrong ALL THE TIME.:deal:


Nobody in the msm holds them to account.



Now the newest thing.............lightning.:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance::happy-1:
 
Mother JONES?????? WTF!

That site is totally F-ing whack job left wing propaganda...

Frank you have out done yourself finding that crack pot site.. lines right up with HOTWHOPPER... both nuts and totally clueless..
You stupid fuck, you never read far enough to see the source was the peer reviewed journal, Sceince?

Projected increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming

Projected increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming
  1. David M. Romps1,*,
  2. Jacob T. Seeley1,
  3. David Vollaro2,
  4. John Molinari2
+Author Affiliations

  1. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Lightning plays an important role in atmospheric chemistry and in the initiation of wildfires, but the impact of global warming on lightning rates is poorly constrained. Here we propose that the lightning flash rate is proportional to the convective available potential energy (CAPE) times the precipitation rate. Using observations, the product of CAPE and precipitation explains 77% of the variance in the time series of total cloud-to-ground lightning flashes over the contiguous United States (CONUS). Storms convert CAPE times precipitated water mass to discharged lightning energy with an efficiency of 1%. When this proxy is applied to 11 climate models, CONUS lightning strikes are predicted to increase 12 ± 5% per degree Celsius of global warming and about 50% over this century.
"Well you stupid fuck..."

Oh wait that's how alarmist try and stifle the truth.

Lets think this through for a moment shall we? Most lightening needs high temp difference and water vapor causing static electricity. Empirical evidence shows that these storms and storm energy is down significantly. Thus its findings are about as robust as toilet paper in the Lew..

Just one more reason that the alarmist controlled journals reproduce ANYTHING that is linked to their AGW agenda even if it is outright trash and every one with half a brain can see that it is bull shit.
 
Billy.....listen man.....did I not tell you when you got into this forum a few months back that it'd be a fucking hoot@!!!!

Few things in life are as satisfying as watching far left k00ks heads explode!!!:boobies::boobies::eusa_dance:
 
Mother JONES?????? WTF!

That site is totally F-ing whack job left wing propaganda...

Frank you have out done yourself finding that crack pot site.. lines right up with HOTWHOPPER... both nuts and totally clueless..

It was Skooks!
 
Mother JONES?????? WTF!

That site is totally F-ing whack job left wing propaganda...

Frank you have out done yourself finding that crack pot site.. lines right up with HOTWHOPPER... both nuts and totally clueless..
You stupid fuck, you never read far enough to see the source was the peer reviewed journal, Sceince?

Projected increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming

Projected increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming
  1. David M. Romps1,*,
  2. Jacob T. Seeley1,
  3. David Vollaro2,
  4. John Molinari2
+Author Affiliations

  1. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Lightning plays an important role in atmospheric chemistry and in the initiation of wildfires, but the impact of global warming on lightning rates is poorly constrained. Here we propose that the lightning flash rate is proportional to the convective available potential energy (CAPE) times the precipitation rate. Using observations, the product of CAPE and precipitation explains 77% of the variance in the time series of total cloud-to-ground lightning flashes over the contiguous United States (CONUS). Storms convert CAPE times precipitated water mass to discharged lightning energy with an efficiency of 1%. When this proxy is applied to 11 climate models, CONUS lightning strikes are predicted to increase 12 ± 5% per degree Celsius of global warming and about 50% over this century.

Global Warming will increase the output of that diamond mine you invested in. You know, the one you bought from the attorney representing the son of the jailed Finance Minister

Fucking moron
 
I post these type threads all the time and every time, bait the AGW contingent in. They ALWAYS show up and get decimated.............its fascinating.........

What is most fascinating is.........all these bold predictions the AGW crowd has made over the last 20 years ( posted with links over the last several posts :bye1: ) that have crashed and burned in spectacular fashion...........its like they never happened!!!:ack-1:

They just keep going with this nonsense...............and wonder why the public has completely tuned them out over the last 8 years or so??:2up:


It has often been said and in fact is social dogma by now......people on the far left are completely controlled by their emotions. They ignore facts because to them, the intentions are the most important thing when you are discussing anything. Results? Not at all a factor when moving forward. I just can never comprehend that kind of thinking which is why it is so compelling.


What they don't get is.......most people in the world DONT think like they do. MOST people think on the margin and measure "costs" in their day to day business. In other words, "results" are more important than intentions. This is exactly why the climate science has had zero impact in the real world.
 
Last edited:
CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013.png
 
I post these type threads all the time and every time, bait the AGW contingent in. They ALWAYS show up and get decimated.............its fascinating.........suckers

What is most fascinating is.........all these bold predictions the AGW crowd has made over the last 20 years ( posted with links over the last several posts :bye1: ) that have crashed and burned in spectacular fashion...........its like they never happened!!!:ack-1:

They just keep going with this nonsense...............and wonder why the public has completely tuned them out over the last 8 years or so??:2up:


It has often been said and in fact is social dogma by now......people on the far left are completely controlled by their emotions. They ignore facts because to them, the intentions are the most important thing when you are discussing anything. Results? Not at all a factor when moving forward. I just can never comprehend that kind of thinking which is why it is so compelling.


What they don't get is.......most people in the world DONT think like they do. MOST people think on the margin and measure "costs" in their day to day business. In other words, "results" are more important than intentions. This is exactly why the climate science has had zero impact in the real world.
 
So Kosh posts a graph he knows is fudged and faked, and skook applauds. Like most deniers, they're flagrantly dishonest POS's.

That's why the whole planet correctly defines skook and Kosh as cult buttboys. Whatever service the cult demands, they instantly provide it. If the cult says lie, they lie. If the cult says bend over, they bend over and drop trou.
 
Mother JONES?????? WTF!

That site is totally F-ing whack job left wing propaganda...

Frank you have out done yourself finding that crack pot site.. lines right up with HOTWHOPPER... both nuts and totally clueless..
You stupid fuck, you never read far enough to see the source was the peer reviewed journal, Sceince?

Projected increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming

Projected increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming
  1. David M. Romps1,*,
  2. Jacob T. Seeley1,
  3. David Vollaro2,
  4. John Molinari2
+Author Affiliations

  1. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Lightning plays an important role in atmospheric chemistry and in the initiation of wildfires, but the impact of global warming on lightning rates is poorly constrained. Here we propose that the lightning flash rate is proportional to the convective available potential energy (CAPE) times the precipitation rate. Using observations, the product of CAPE and precipitation explains 77% of the variance in the time series of total cloud-to-ground lightning flashes over the contiguous United States (CONUS). Storms convert CAPE times precipitated water mass to discharged lightning energy with an efficiency of 1%. When this proxy is applied to 11 climate models, CONUS lightning strikes are predicted to increase 12 ± 5% per degree Celsius of global warming and about 50% over this century.
which means, we have better computers today to see all of the lightning strikes so now we can say that it is because of AGW. LOL hahahahaa and all of that. Go get a job.
 

Forum List

Back
Top