Newtonian Physics Declared to Be Genderist and Oppressive

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

don't worry about it, rightwingnuts don't believe in science anyway.

I'm also pretty sure if the "national review" said it, it's garbage.

How can somebody with no Physics background write about Physics?

Can I offer you medical advice honey?

most of us studied physics at some point.

not you, don't worry, we know you didn't

thanks for proving my point, snooky bear.

trump loons are so easy.

How many physics classes have you taken darling?

i wouldn't worry about it if I were you. but how many have you taken, snookie bear, you know, since you're all het up and all...

for the record, I wasn't arguing physics. I was pointing out the poor sourcing. not that you'd be able to respond to a substantive scientific discussion anyway.

we all get that you aren't very bright.

it's ok.

i can't help it if rightwingnut poindscum hate science and are averse to education.

Honey let me help you here:

If you want to ask a question us the question mark "?". Like I did.

Try it yourself.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Are Super Planets discriminatory?

Are Fat Muons shaming?

Are Neutrons and Protons oppressive to electrons that are held in valence shells?

The liberal mind wants to know.

 

[OldLady]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

I don't pretend to know what in hell that means, but Stark MUST realize that our brains are wired to organize information into subgroups also known as "stereotyping?" We fight it if we have a liberal mind.

How many physics courses have you taken?

I think I'm on your side this time, genius.

I am just not sure what a liberal mind has to do with the law of physics?

Vectors are political?

Who knew?

I humbly submit that what the article is crabbing about is the outcome of how our brain is wired. But never mind. I should know better than to try to make heads or tails of anything to do with physics. I'm still trying to figure out the seesaw thing.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Well, I am cool with newtonian physics and believe people that do think this way are wrong...

On the otherhand, there's no reason to be a asshole to people either.

 

[Darkwind]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

don't worry about it, rightwingnuts don't believe in science anyway.

I'm also pretty sure if the "national review" said it, it's garbage.

How can somebody with no Physics background write about Physics?

Can I offer you medical advice honey?

Don't worry, Jullian doesn't believe in science. Only in what the party tells her to believe.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Never underestimate the lunacy of the liberal mind. .... ...

Same could be said about the far right when it comes to their god and economic beliefs.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Are Super Planets discriminatory?

Are Fat Muons shaming?

Are Neutrons and Protons oppressive to electrons that are held in valence shells?

The liberal mind wants to know.

No,
No,
No,

I support science and anyone that thinks it is shaming anyone is a idiot....

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Stark is a total lunatic. She purports to replace quantum physics with quantum feminism based on a writing by a black feminist from 1973 Africa.

Has she done the math on this?

 

[jillian]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

don't worry about it, rightwingnuts don't believe in science anyway.

I'm also pretty sure if the "national review" said it, it's garbage.

How can somebody with no Physics background write about Physics?

Can I offer you medical advice honey?

most of us studied physics at some point.

not you, don't worry, we know you didn't

thanks for proving my point, snooky bear.

trump loons are so easy.

You are so smart honey - unfortunately I have two degrees in electrical engineering and applied physics.

Whitney Stark has how many??

Sure ya do

 

[ScienceRocks]

Stark is a total lunatic. She purports to replace quantum physics with quantum feminism based on a writing by a black feminist from 1973 Africa.

Has she done the math on this?

Probably not...Such is the new science of opinions based conclusions. It aint science without evidence to form a Hypothesis and that typically takes math.

 

[aris2chat]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

I don't pretend to know what in hell that means, but Stark MUST realize that our brains are wired to organize information into subgroups also known as "stereotyping?" We fight it if we have a liberal mind.

How many physics courses have you taken?

I think I'm on your side this time, genius.

I am just not sure what a liberal mind has to do with the law of physics?

Vectors are political?

Who knew?

I humbly submit that what the article is crabbing about is the outcome of how our brain is wired. But never mind. I should know better than to try to make heads or tails of anything to do with physics. I'm still trying to figure out the seesaw thing.

fulcrum

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Are Super Planets discriminatory?

Are Fat Muons shaming?

Are Neutrons and Protons oppressive to electrons that are held in valence shells?

The liberal mind wants to know.

When electrons are excited into the conduction band is that triggering?

Is light bisexual - particle and and wave?

 

[Votto]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

Fake news.................right?

Please lie to me and say yes.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Stark is a total lunatic. She purports to replace quantum physics with quantum feminism based on a writing by a black feminist from 1973 Africa.

Has she done the math on this?

Math is racist brahj - are you not getting it.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

Fake news.................right?

Is physics Genderist and Oppressive or what?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

don't worry about it, rightwingnuts don't believe in science anyway.

I'm also pretty sure if the "national review" said it, it's garbage.

How can somebody with no Physics background write about Physics?

Can I offer you medical advice honey?

most of us studied physics at some point.

not you, don't worry, we know you didn't

thanks for proving my point, snooky bear.

trump loons are so easy.

You are so smart honey - unfortunately I have two degrees in electrical engineering and applied physics.

Whitney Stark has how many??

Sure ya do

Any luck with using the question mark "?" yet Jillian Sweety?

 

[Votto]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

Fake news.................right?

Is physics Genderist and Oppressive or what?

Newton was a white Christian male, so everything he said and did was poo.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

I just cant make this crap up, and sometimes I feel embarrassed to even link to it, lol.

But here it is for your perusal, if you like spelunking into the modern liberal mind.

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People

Whitney Stark argues that Newton’s understanding of physics is oppressive because it has “separated beings” based on their “binary and absolute differences” — a structure that she calls “hierarchical and exploitative” — and the same kind of system is “embedded in many structures of classification,” making it “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.” Stark explains:

This structural thinking of individualized separatism with binary and absolute differences as the basis for how the universe works seeped into/poured over/ is embedded in many structures of classification, which understand similarity and difference in the world, imposed in many hierarchical and exploitative organizational structures, whether through gender, life/nonlife, national borders, and so on. ​

According to Stark, the tendency to categorize in this way particularly hurts marginalized people because it can cause the activist efforts of minority groups to be “overshadowed” by the efforts of dominant groups.​

Liberals are overwhelming the system to cause the destruction of our US government and our sacred institutions.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

 

[gallantwarrior]

Stark is a total lunatic. She purports to replace quantum physics with quantum feminism based on a writing by a black feminist from 1973 Africa.

Has she done the math on this?

Math? She don't need no stinkin' math! Math be for stoopid nerd-people.