Nice one CIC Trump ... US troop injuries after Iran missile strike rises to 64

An a **** would sit quietly after President Obama and Sec of State watched an ambassador of the Untied States plead for help...and perish when none came.

President Trump reacted like President Obama and Sec Of State Clinton should have

If Trump had done the right thing, we have no troops in Iraq to be harmed.
If George W. Bush hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place, we wouldn't have been there in the first place.

No doubt but that doesn't excuse still being there.
Trump ran on getting us out of endless wars, but keeps being pressured by the Hawks on both sides of the aisle, as well as the Pentagon to stay for various reasons. The other thing is that no matter what you do, Islam is composed of two houses. The House of Islam and the House of War.
The House of Islam is responsible for the teachings of Muhammad and its adherence, while the House of War has the responsibility to commit to war (Jihad) against all infidels until only Islam rules the Earth. What we call terrorists are simply the para-military arm of Islam. Muslims can enter into "contracts" with infidels, however, it can only be on a temporary basis. But the goal always remains, to destroy all that is un-Islamic. Because of Islam's House of War, Islam's para-military arm will always be attacking soft targets, killing infidels. Are we to simply complain to Iran (or any other Islamic nation) when their para-military arm kills Americans, Thai's, Chinese, Hindus, Brits, Germans, Spaniards, Canadians, French, Danes, Kenyans, Filipinos, Russians and Dutch? All these nations and more have experienced attacks by Islamists. If you say, "well, they also attack other Muslims," true. However, the reason for this is that in the case of the Shiites and the Sunnis, they consider the other, not true Muslims, so what do you think about you!

It's the United States starting the wars, overthrowing the governments of other countries and killing tens of thousands.

We have no moral standing to be condemning anyone .
World War I: A Serbian Nationalist and European defense treaties got that war going. We entered into it late.
World War II: Germany started that war in September of 1939. We didn't get declare war until Japan declared it an ally of Germany and attacked us.
Korean War: North Korea invaded South Korea and the United Nations sent in troops, we were included. We're still there because we have a defense treaty with the South Korean government.
Vietnam War: There you have me. Our entry into this conflict was built on a lie, however, to be fair, the non-Communist government in Vietnam wanted help to not be forced into Communism. We only pulled out due to US public pressure. The intentions to help a people not be forced into Communism was well intentioned.
Lebanon: We were part of a Multi-National Peace Keeping Force, not fighting a war.
Operation Desert Shield (Saudi Arabia) Libya attacked Kuwait, took their airfields and began amassing troops on Saudi Arabia's border. Saudi Arabia's government requested our military assistance and as both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia were major oil importers to the US, it was in our National Security interest to agree to go in militarily. After the Libyans were thrown out, no-fly zones were placed on Libya to keep a buffer zone between them and Kuwait.
Haiti: Operation Uphold Democracy was implemented, sending in 20,000 troops to re-install the Democratically elected president and oust a military junta that had taken over.
Panama: The Panamanian government confined US students to the school they were attending and Noriega was aiding in drug trafficking, so a force was sent in to retrieve the students and get Noriega.
Iraq: Operation Desert Storm. I have very mixed feelings about this one. The US CIA aided in getting Hussein into power. He tortured and killed a lot of Iraqis. However, on the other side, those that wanted him out were the Shiites. We got him into power because the ruler at the time, was pro-Communism. It was sort of a damned if you do get involved and damned if you don't. Although, I think in the long term, we should have just stayed out of it completely, but that's hindsight. You can't go back and have a do over.
Bosnia: NATO, which we are a part of pressured Bosnia to stop attacking civilian targets, they refused and NATO went in, and since NATO goes in, we have to go along. That's what treaties are about.
Afghanistan: Osama bin Laden orchestrated the attacks that brought down the World Trade Center and struck the Pentagon. Per his statement, he did so because infidels were in his homeland of Saudi Arabia. Well, Saudi Arabia requested us there to curtail Hussein's aggression. He told his followers that he could not rest until there were no more infidels. He was a follower of the Muslim Brotherhood.
He left Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and went into Afghanistan. The US demanded that the then Taliban government turn him over to the US for prosecution. The Taliban, following Afghani custom, refused to turn a guest over to a foreign government for prosecution, especially an infidel nation.
They said, "if you want him, come try and take him." They were keenly aware that no nation had ever conquered them, they had forced the Russians out and felt confident that the same would hold true. So, we accepted their challenge. Hey, when you're given a challenge like that, go for it.
The Afghani's that had been allied with the Russians, wanted their government back, so sided with the US and through our combined efforts, have gotten the original government, back in Kabul, albeit tenuously. Once we killed bin Laden and his main followers, we should have then pulled out, but we're still bogged down there. That's one that needs to end.
Now, there have been numerous small interventions, mostly in the form of advisors for established governments or some rebel forces, but those are about the only actual wars that involved massive troops.
A fair amount of nations get involved in foreign conflicts. Mankind has been killing his fellow humans since he first picked up a rock or other blunt or sharp implement and it isn't going to end until mankind ceases to exist on the planet, no matter what you or I wish.
 
If Trump had done the right thing, we have no troops in Iraq to be harmed.
If George W. Bush hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place, we wouldn't have been there in the first place.

No doubt but that doesn't excuse still being there.
Trump ran on getting us out of endless wars, but keeps being pressured by the Hawks on both sides of the aisle, as well as the Pentagon to stay for various reasons. The other thing is that no matter what you do, Islam is composed of two houses. The House of Islam and the House of War.
The House of Islam is responsible for the teachings of Muhammad and its adherence, while the House of War has the responsibility to commit to war (Jihad) against all infidels until only Islam rules the Earth. What we call terrorists are simply the para-military arm of Islam. Muslims can enter into "contracts" with infidels, however, it can only be on a temporary basis. But the goal always remains, to destroy all that is un-Islamic. Because of Islam's House of War, Islam's para-military arm will always be attacking soft targets, killing infidels. Are we to simply complain to Iran (or any other Islamic nation) when their para-military arm kills Americans, Thai's, Chinese, Hindus, Brits, Germans, Spaniards, Canadians, French, Danes, Kenyans, Filipinos, Russians and Dutch? All these nations and more have experienced attacks by Islamists. If you say, "well, they also attack other Muslims," true. However, the reason for this is that in the case of the Shiites and the Sunnis, they consider the other, not true Muslims, so what do you think about you!

It's the United States starting the wars, overthrowing the governments of other countries and killing tens of thousands.

We have no moral standing to be condemning anyone .
World War I: A Serbian Nationalist and European defense treaties got that war going. We entered into it late.
World War II: Germany started that war in September of 1939. We didn't get declare war until Japan declared it an ally of Germany and attacked us.
Korean War: North Korea invaded South Korea and the United Nations sent in troops, we were included. We're still there because we have a defense treaty with the South Korean government.
Vietnam War: There you have me. Our entry into this conflict was built on a lie, however, to be fair, the non-Communist government in Vietnam wanted help to not be forced into Communism. We only pulled out due to US public pressure. The intentions to help a people not be forced into Communism was well intentioned.
Lebanon: We were part of a Multi-National Peace Keeping Force, not fighting a war.
Operation Desert Shield (Saudi Arabia) Libya attacked Kuwait, took their airfields and began amassing troops on Saudi Arabia's border. Saudi Arabia's government requested our military assistance and as both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia were major oil importers to the US, it was in our National Security interest to agree to go in militarily. After the Libyans were thrown out, no-fly zones were placed on Libya to keep a buffer zone between them and Kuwait.
Haiti: Operation Uphold Democracy was implemented, sending in 20,000 troops to re-install the Democratically elected president and oust a military junta that had taken over.
Panama: The Panamanian government confined US students to the school they were attending and Noriega was aiding in drug trafficking, so a force was sent in to retrieve the students and get Noriega.
Iraq: Operation Desert Storm. I have very mixed feelings about this one. The US CIA aided in getting Hussein into power. He tortured and killed a lot of Iraqis. However, on the other side, those that wanted him out were the Shiites. We got him into power because the ruler at the time, was pro-Communism. It was sort of a damned if you do get involved and damned if you don't. Although, I think in the long term, we should have just stayed out of it completely, but that's hindsight. You can't go back and have a do over.
Bosnia: NATO, which we are a part of pressured Bosnia to stop attacking civilian targets, they refused and NATO went in, and since NATO goes in, we have to go along. That's what treaties are about.
Afghanistan: Osama bin Laden orchestrated the attacks that brought down the World Trade Center and struck the Pentagon. Per his statement, he did so because infidels were in his homeland of Saudi Arabia. Well, Saudi Arabia requested us there to curtail Hussein's aggression. He told his followers that he could not rest until there were no more infidels. He was a follower of the Muslim Brotherhood.
He left Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and went into Afghanistan. The US demanded that the then Taliban government turn him over to the US for prosecution. The Taliban, following Afghani custom, refused to turn a guest over to a foreign government for prosecution, especially an infidel nation.
They said, "if you want him, come try and take him." They were keenly aware that no nation had ever conquered them, they had forced the Russians out and felt confident that the same would hold true. So, we accepted their challenge. Hey, when you're given a challenge like that, go for it.
The Afghani's that had been allied with the Russians, wanted their government back, so sided with the US and through our combined efforts, have gotten the original government, back in Kabul, albeit tenuously. Once we killed bin Laden and his main followers, we should have then pulled out, but we're still bogged down there. That's one that needs to end.
Now, there have been numerous small interventions, mostly in the form of advisors for established governments or some rebel forces, but those are about the only actual wars that involved massive troops.
A fair amount of nations get involved in foreign conflicts. Mankind has been killing his fellow humans since he first picked up a rock or other blunt or sharp implement and it isn't going to end until mankind ceases to exist on the planet, no matter what you or I wish.

So as you note, we have no moral standing in condemning others.
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

You jumped from President Bush to President Trump. There is an eight year gap in your reasoning.

Purposely or neglectful?

You're dishonest
Bush put us there. He was CIC. If it were not for Bush we would not be there.

Most of our horrific human losses were under Bush.

It wasn't Obama. It wasn't Trump.

You're dishonest.
.
X2wqZkD.gif

You neglected eight years, not me.

You're not terribly bright but totally dishonest
I appreciate your unsolicited whining.
.
 
Are Iranian missiles more powerful than US intelligence was aware of?
So, in other words, our intelligence agencies were not aware
Iran was building better missiles with the money Obama freed up

Donald Trump exemplifies that 'US Intelligence' is an oxymoron.

Too many stable geniuses who underperform outside the stable.

'US Intelligence' was also unaware that Iran could successfully conduct the attack that they are alleged to have committed against Saudi Arabia.
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

You jumped from President Bush to President Trump. There is an eight year gap in your reasoning.

Purposely or neglectful?

You're dishonest

You are evidently bogus. There is no such thing as a classy Canadian.

That's your opinion and I don't get in the mud with pigs. Too classy for that

Shall we discuss the right years of war between President Bush and President Trump? Or is that a distraction to your argument

If you were a real Canadian you would be profusely apologetic now.

Nobody apologizes more than Canadians. And, with good cause.

In regard to your military knowledge, Canadians have the weakest military in the developed world and the Canadain military couldn't defeat a force from Timbuktu.

Canadians consider the Canadian military as just something that is brought out for parades.
He just jumped in to complain about nothing.

Maybe that's a Canadian thing too, who knows.
.
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

You jumped from President Bush to President Trump. There is an eight year gap in your reasoning.

Purposely or neglectful?

You're dishonest

You are evidently bogus. There is no such thing as a classy Canadian.

That's your opinion and I don't get in the mud with pigs. Too classy for that

Shall we discuss the right years of war between President Bush and President Trump? Or is that a distraction to your argument

If you were a real Canadian you would be profusely apologetic now.

Nobody apologizes more than Canadians. And, with good cause.

In regard to your military knowledge, Canadians have the weakest military in the developed world and the Canadain military couldn't defeat a force from Timbuktu.

Canadians consider the Canadian military as just something that is brought out for parades.

He just jumped in to complain about nothing.

Maybe that's a Canadian thing too, who knows.
.

Canadians always say 'I guess'. Canadians guess and guess wrong mostly which creates opportunities for them to exercise their skills at apologizing.

Canadians are exceptionally apologetic.
 
Are Iranian missiles more powerful than US intelligence was aware of?
So, in other words, our intelligence agencies were not aware
Iran was building better missiles with the money Obama freed up

Donald Trump exemplifies that 'US Intelligence' is an oxymoron.

Too many stable geniuses who underperform outside the stable.

'US Intelligence' was also unaware that Iran could successfully conduct the attack that they are alleged to have committed against Saudi Arabia.
Obama set this course into action.
 
Are Iranian missiles more powerful than US intelligence was aware of?
So, in other words, our intelligence agencies were not aware
Iran was building better missiles with the money Obama freed up

Donald Trump exemplifies that 'US Intelligence' is an oxymoron.

Too many stable geniuses who underperform outside the stable.

'US Intelligence' was also unaware that Iran could successfully conduct the attack that they are alleged to have committed against Saudi Arabia.

Obama set this course into action.

You evidently have cranium thickness that would withstand an explosion from an Iranian missile.

Iran has accelerated its missile program since Trump reneged on the nuclear deal with Iran.

The money Obama gave to Iran was Iran's money.
 
21 troops have been evacuated from Iraq. Others have returned to duty. Has the military discouraged troops from reporting brain injury causing the late injury reports?

If the Iranian missile strikes were so powerful, did the US military fail to adequately protect its troops from strikes it knew were coming?

The injury toll from the Iran missile strike is increasing daily. Thank god there were no troops with bone spurs at the sites or deaths would have been certain.

Fortunately for the Iranians, thick-skulled Donald Trump has denounced brain-injured troops as thin-skulled, sissies, and cowards. It is not Iran's fault that sissies and cowards have infested Donald Trump's military.

When will the toll from the Iranian missiles stop growing?

Are Iranian missiles more powerful than US intelligence was aware of?

US troop injuries after Iran missile strike rises to 64

US troop injuries after Iran missile strike rises to 64
BY REBECCA KLAR - 01/30/20 09:15 PM EST 373

Fourteen additional U.S. service members have been diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries from an Iranian attack on an Iraqi air base earlier this month, the Pentagon announced Thursday.

A Department of Defense official said that 64 U.S. service members in total have been diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury, or a TBI. The updated figures are a 14-person increase from what the department reported Wednesday.

The department initially reported 34 service members had been injured last week, before upping the number to 50.

Thirty-nine members have returned to duty, Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col Thomas Campbell said. Twenty-one service members have been taken to Germany for further evaluation and treatment of TBI.

The Iranian attack on the Iraqi airbase was in retaliation for President Trump’s order for a drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad International Airport.
No doubt your solution to either Iranian generals and ISIS or other terrorists, planning and killing American or other Infidels, is....I'm guessing, strong language and in the case of Iran, perhaps more sanctions. Wait, they're already almost sanctioned to the max.
Or, perhaps, it's to run away, thinking that just because you've run away, Islam doesn't want you converted to Islam, subjugated by Islam or, killed for not agreeing to the first two.

This from the same ilk that ran in circles screaming how Obama was waging wars in all these countries and cried when Obama took out a US citizen terrorist.

Trump did something stupid. He assassinated a foreign country's leadership.

He did it & put US troops in danger.

He left troops close to Iran in bases without missile defense systems.

Then he mocked their injuries.

Only a total asshole defends that action.

I may not use that word but I believe the overall point applies to anyone that defends any of it.

An a **** would sit quietly after President Obama and Sec of State watched an ambassador of the Untied States plead for help...and perish when none came.

President Trump reacted like President Obama and Sec Of State Clinton should have

Lhi ng fuck. Obama ordered the Joint Chiefs to do what they could. You assfucks need to quit using the deaths at Benghazi as political fodder. Watch what? Do you think there was a live feed? Or are you just another dumbass Trumpette liar?
 
If you were a real Canadian you would be profusely apologetic now.

Nobody apologizes more than Canadians. And, with good cause.

In regard to your military knowledge, Canadians have the weakest military in the developed world and the Canadain military couldn't defeat a force from Timbuktu.

Canadians consider the Canadian military as just something that is brought out for parades.

You're annoying

Let's discuss 2500 American and an unavailable figure but numbering hundreds of Canadian troops killed from 2008 to 2016.

If you can't then don't respond.

I seem to recall a number of those Canadian troops were killed by American troops.

The Canadian presence in Afghanistan is token. They probably wouldn't be there without US air support.

You skipped 2500 US military deaths under Obama. Why?

We both know why.

Your friend Mac gave up the ghost, you should
Deaths in wars he inherited.

Why is it you worthless pieces of shit keep blaming Obama for what Bush left behind.

If you can't respond without profanity then don't.

Leftists are such vile ugly creatures. But wait, you're tolerant? Pshhh
Blow it out your ass. Trump says all of these words & you love him.
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
The Resolution merely gave Bush authority. The final decision and responsibility belonged to one (1) person and one (1) person only: Bush.
.
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
The Resolution merely gave Bush authority. The final decision and responsibility belonged to one (1) person and one (1) person only: Bush.
.

Without the resolution he ( Bush ) would have never had the authority to invade.

Congress failed the American people and the world in 2002 and now Pelosi want to fix it...

Democrats and Republicans own that mess in the Middle East and just not Bush!
 
21 troops have been evacuated from Iraq. Others have returned to duty. Has the military discouraged troops from reporting brain injury causing the late injury reports?

If the Iranian missile strikes were so powerful, did the US military fail to adequately protect its troops from strikes it knew were coming?

The injury toll from the Iran missile strike is increasing daily. Thank god there were no troops with bone spurs at the sites or deaths would have been certain.

Fortunately for the Iranians, thick-skulled Donald Trump has denounced brain-injured troops as thin-skulled, sissies, and cowards. It is not Iran's fault that sissies and cowards have infested Donald Trump's military.

When will the toll from the Iranian missiles stop growing?

Are Iranian missiles more powerful than US intelligence was aware of?

US troop injuries after Iran missile strike rises to 64

US troop injuries after Iran missile strike rises to 64
BY REBECCA KLAR - 01/30/20 09:15 PM EST 373

Fourteen additional U.S. service members have been diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries from an Iranian attack on an Iraqi air base earlier this month, the Pentagon announced Thursday.

A Department of Defense official said that 64 U.S. service members in total have been diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury, or a TBI. The updated figures are a 14-person increase from what the department reported Wednesday.

The department initially reported 34 service members had been injured last week, before upping the number to 50.

Thirty-nine members have returned to duty, Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col Thomas Campbell said. Twenty-one service members have been taken to Germany for further evaluation and treatment of TBI.

The Iranian attack on the Iraqi airbase was in retaliation for President Trump’s order for a drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad International Airport.

Trump did nothing wrong.

Admitting to any success by the enemy's attack, does nothing for US, and gives them a propaganda victory.

What part of this bothers you?

As CIC he failed to protect the 64 brain injury victims.


Troops in war zones are in danger. No President can change that. Your claim is not sane.

What is your real concern here?

Dispelling ignorance.


YOu are fooling no one, not even yourself, so what is the point of your silliness?
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
The Resolution merely gave Bush authority. The final decision and responsibility belonged to one (1) person and one (1) person only: Bush.
.

Without the resolution he ( Bush ) would have never had the authority to invade.

Congress failed the American people and the world in 2002 and now Pelosi want to fix it...

Democrats and Republicans own that mess in the Middle East and just not Bush!
That's just denial. The CIC is at the very top. One person makes the final decision.
.
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
After Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors searched 700 sites and came up empty the lame excuse to invade was gone. The responsibility for the 4,500 dead and 23,000 wounded is on one man and one man alone and it wasn`t anyone named Biden, Clinton, Kerry, etc. Manson`s prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi properly called it murder.
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder - Wikipedia
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
The Resolution merely gave Bush authority. The final decision and responsibility belonged to one (1) person and one (1) person only: Bush.
.

Without the resolution he ( Bush ) would have never had the authority to invade.

Congress failed the American people and the world in 2002 and now Pelosi want to fix it...

Democrats and Republicans own that mess in the Middle East and just not Bush!
That's just denial. The CIC is at the very top. One person makes the final decision.
.

Holy shit, I am in denial?

Bullshit!

You know very well had the 2002 Iraq Resolution not been passed and given to Bush we would not be here!

Bush nor Trump were or are Kings!

Both sides own this and not just one man and remember Trump has the 2002 Resolution to do as he please with, so when will you accept the reality this is more than Bush?
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
The Resolution merely gave Bush authority. The final decision and responsibility belonged to one (1) person and one (1) person only: Bush.
.

Without the resolution he ( Bush ) would have never had the authority to invade.

Congress failed the American people and the world in 2002 and now Pelosi want to fix it...

Democrats and Republicans own that mess in the Middle East and just not Bush!
That's just denial. The CIC is at the very top. One person makes the final decision.
.

Holy shit, I am in denial?

Bullshit!

You know very well had the 2002 Iraq Resolution not been passed and given to Bush we would not be here!

Bush nor Trump were or are Kings!

Both sides own this and not just one man and remember Trump has the 2002 Resolution to do as he please with, so when will you accept the reality this is more than Bush?
Who makes the final decision whether OR NOT to send American troops to war?

There is one answer. What is it?
.
 
The keyboard Rambos don't care about the costs of military action - look at the TRILLIONS of dollars, THOUSANDS of young American lives lost, and THOUSANDS MORE young American minds, limbs and families destroyed since 2003 over there in the sand.

They SUPPORTED Bush's wars, and now they PRETEND they NEVER DID.

And these injuries? Hey, collateral damage. No big deal. Spin for Trump no matter what.
.

I never did support the war and if the Slate still had it archived I would access them to prove I was fully against the war but did not fully blame Bush like you just did...

Had the Congress not passed the bipartisan 2002 Iraq Resolution then Bush would have not had the power he needed to invade.

So blame goes to those like Biden along with Bush...

Both sides are full of shit when it come to their concern and mocking of what happened in Iraq after the death of the Iranian General and Trump should man up and admit his first words were wrong and that injuries did happen and he will later release a full detailed statement...
After Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors searched 700 sites and came up empty the lame excuse to invade was gone. The responsibility for the 4,500 dead and 23,000 wounded is on one man and one man alone and it wasn`t anyone named Biden, Clinton, Kerry, etc. Manson`s prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi properly called it murder.
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder - Wikipedia

Funny how the Congress had no involvement in this when they gave him ( Bush ) the power to invade...

Still making excuses for the no balls Congress of 2002 and if Bush should be put on trial so should the entire U.S. Government because again Bush was not a King!
 

Forum List

Back
Top