RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
Progressives just have a way of putting their heads on a batting tee like a big old pumpkin and handing the conservative a Louisville Slugger.![]()
So, everyone has one of these devices?
Right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Progressives just have a way of putting their heads on a batting tee like a big old pumpkin and handing the conservative a Louisville Slugger.![]()
I guess you never read your own posts.The kid used what was available to himWhat ever will the left do now? Those evil bastard AR-15's were not involved, just a shotgun and A REVOLVER.
If his father had an AR 15, you can be sure it would have made its way to school
The carnage would have been much worse with an AR15
Perhaps the st00pidest thing ever posted on this site. What a meathead. But this guy would take advice from a Rastaman providing NHL Stanley Cup playoff analysis.
![]()
"natural"Uh, I hate to tell.you this but fireamr ownership isn't a "natural right". Even if there were such a thing as a "natural right" it wouldn't be one as guns are man made.yeah , you and yer ilk want to decide eh 'ilk' named LLaugher !!
We will decide via the ballot box. You can dig that, can’t ya? Or will you call it “rigged”?
Clown.
You and your ilk have no right to limit the natural right of people who have committed no crime.
You have an absolute right to defend your life by the most efficient means possible. That means "fireamr" ownership is a natural right as acknowledged in the Second Amendment.
Um no. "Natural rights" is a nonsense phrase to start with. Rights are a product of society, a purely human construct. Nothing natural about it. Our society does indeed grant you the right to defend yourself, but there are no guarantees what tools you get to use. I suggest you take some lessons in a martial art or get a big dog.Uh, I hate to tell.you this but fireamr ownership isn't a "natural right". Even if there were such a thing as a "natural right" it wouldn't be one as guns are man made.yeah , you and yer ilk want to decide eh 'ilk' named LLaugher !!
We will decide via the ballot box. You can dig that, can’t ya? Or will you call it “rigged”?
Clown.
You and your ilk have no right to limit the natural right of people who have committed no crime.
You have an absolute right to defend your life by the most efficient means possible. That means "fireamr" ownership is a natural right as acknowledged in the Second Amendment.
"natural"Uh, I hate to tell.you this but fireamr ownership isn't a "natural right". Even if there were such a thing as a "natural right" it wouldn't be one as guns are man made.yeah , you and yer ilk want to decide eh 'ilk' named LLaugher !!
We will decide via the ballot box. You can dig that, can’t ya? Or will you call it “rigged”?
Clown.
You and your ilk have no right to limit the natural right of people who have committed no crime.
You have an absolute right to defend your life by the most efficient means possible. That means "fireamr" ownership is a natural right as acknowledged in the Second Amendment.
The USSC said that you are full of shit. Guns types & where toted can be regulated.
What ever will the left do now? Those evil bastard AR-15's were not involved, just a shotgun and A REVOLVER.
TEN PEOPLE DEAD. CHILDREN who will never grow up. Some still hospitalized with life threatening/life changing wounds. Families shattered. They will never ever recover from this unspeakable trauma. Children afraid to go to school.
And you're celebrating?
The evil bastard is in your own mirror.
SHAME on the lot of you for putting a higher value on your AR15 than you do your own children.
I once watched a tv documentary on Vietnam in which a Marine Recon unit preparing for a patrol was armed with shotguns. The commentator did talk about why they preferred shotguns in jungle regions but I don't recall the details.What ever will the left do now? Those evil bastard AR-15's were not involved, just a shotgun and A REVOLVER.
I've read it, the man is a lunatic.Um no. "Natural rights" is a nonsense phrase to start with. Rights are a product of society, a purely human construct. Nothing natural about it. Our society does indeed grant you the right to defend yourself, but there are no guarantees what tools you get to use. I suggest you take some lessons in a martial art or get a big dog.Uh, I hate to tell.you this but fireamr ownership isn't a "natural right". Even if there were such a thing as a "natural right" it wouldn't be one as guns are man made.We will decide via the ballot box. You can dig that, can’t ya? Or will you call it “rigged”?
Clown.
You and your ilk have no right to limit the natural right of people who have committed no crime.
You have an absolute right to defend your life by the most efficient means possible. That means "fireamr" ownership is a natural right as acknowledged in the Second Amendment.
John Locke disagreed with you. John Locke on the rights to life, liberty, and property of ourselves and others (1689) - Online Library of Liberty Society LIMITS your natural rights. I suggest you go pound salt.
BS he is waiting for his check at George's house....David Hogg is front and center pushing for tighter gun controls
So, why can't I go down to gander mountain and buy an nice 30mm Bushmaster cannon then?"natural"Uh, I hate to tell.you this but fireamr ownership isn't a "natural right". Even if there were such a thing as a "natural right" it wouldn't be one as guns are man made.We will decide via the ballot box. You can dig that, can’t ya? Or will you call it “rigged”?
Clown.
You and your ilk have no right to limit the natural right of people who have committed no crime.
You have an absolute right to defend your life by the most efficient means possible. That means "fireamr" ownership is a natural right as acknowledged in the Second Amendment.
The USSC said that you are full of shit. Guns types & where toted can be regulated.
That's NOT what the SCOTUS said. Scalia in his opinion that limitations CAN be put on people's second amendment rights due to their actions (Felons cannot own firearms for example) but he never said everyone could be limited.
The kid was bullied and that needs to be solved before shit like this stops.
Other kids need to be disciplined and learn respect for other people from an early age. Too many kids think they can be little demons and that isn't acceptable. You go to fucking school to learn and you better fucking show respect towards other people.
You keep claiming this last Presidential election was rigged now don't you.yeah , you and yer ilk want to decide eh 'ilk' named LLaugher !!
We will decide via the ballot box. You can dig that, can’t ya? Or will you call it “rigged”?
Clown.
------------------------------------------------ think that you can buy most anything you want , problem is licensing and then of course money . --- --- its from 2003 so its older but these shoots go on all the time in many different areas . Its just that its my favorite , i like the music and the people shown represent me pretty well Crep .So, why can't I go down to gander mountain and buy an nice 30mm Bushmaster cannon then?"natural"Uh, I hate to tell.you this but fireamr ownership isn't a "natural right". Even if there were such a thing as a "natural right" it wouldn't be one as guns are man made.You and your ilk have no right to limit the natural right of people who have committed no crime.
You have an absolute right to defend your life by the most efficient means possible. That means "fireamr" ownership is a natural right as acknowledged in the Second Amendment.
The USSC said that you are full of shit. Guns types & where toted can be regulated.
That's NOT what the SCOTUS said. Scalia in his opinion that limitations CAN be put on people's second amendment rights due to their actions (Felons cannot own firearms for example) but he never said everyone could be limited.