No, Chansley Was Not Escorted Into the Capitol Building

The FBI admitted to this during testimony before the J6 hearing and House Oversight Hearing, ya ignorant f*tard.

Your buddies back at the kids' table are calling. Why don't you stop embarrassing yourself, go back & join them, & let the adults talk...

:itsok:
You lie! :) Link it, if you're not Pinocchio!
 
No one, ya moron.
He walked in through the doors let open by the insurrectionists that busted through the windows, then opened the doors from the inside to let other insurrectionists inside.

All you have is repeated claims of 'altered video'
You LOSE EMH-MF.

Correct, Chansley was carefully Followed. Followed, not escorted.
Capitol Police: Follow the crazy guy, but don't engage.


LOL!!!

This is funny, all the hate hoaxers in full panic mode, unable to explain the clear and indisputable truth that Jacob Chansley was

Capitol Hill's 1/6 GUEST OF HONOR


which included the full escort to the Senate with 9 Capitol Officers standing at attention as SHEmon was let loose...
 
Wait a minute...............................

You're saying that because the officials perceived a threat by the protesters, and decided to take the Congress personnel into a safe space, it was the fault of the officials and not the protesters for the election results being delayed?

Nope. Not what I said at all. Do you have trouble comprehending English?
If the people hadn't been protesting and rioting in the first place, the officials wouldn't have had to escort the Congress people to safety, and the certification wouldn't have been delayed.
True. Up to a point. But that applies differently to different actors.
That's almost as stupid as saying that a woman walking down the street wearing tight clothing who gets raped is the one at fault and not the rapist because she dressed provocatively.
That would be stupid, but it’s also not remotely akin to anything I said or suggested.
Either (a) you are a great troll, because you try to explain stuff with the most convoluted of reasoning and getting others to respond to you, or (b) you are one of the dumbest people on the planet because you actually believe the bullshit you spew.
False dichotomy. It’s not my fault that you are unable to follow along.
I've been going with (a) so far, but if you keep posting these lame assed excuses, I'm gonna switch to believing that you are one of those brainwashed simpletons and are as stupid as you post.
Oh no. A dolt like you will think ill of me? The horror. The horror. :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301::itsok:
 
I have multiple times, lil' triggered princess, AS YOU ALREADY KNOW.
I have seen NOTHING on the few operatives from different agencies embedded in the crowd that several agencies admitted early on were present at the rally and in the crowds, were inside the capitol building in MAGA Garb before the seditionist rioters broke in, as you claimed in your post.

Link up!
 
Capitol Hill's 1/6 GUEST OF HONOR
You've claimed this multiple times.
Your LIE will never be truth.
Where do you come up with this ^^^^^ bullshit.

I'd like to see your source, or is this ^^^^^ just your theory?
 
Ok, we agree. Here’s what he plead guilty of:

18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).

(c) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.


Now read the bold part. The consequence of their behavior did result in a decision to delay the certification - a decision that you don’t find unreasonable. Thus, these people are guilty of impeding the official proceeding.
No response from BackAgain.

Looks like he ran away AGAIN.
 
I have seen NOTHING on the few operatives from different agencies embedded in the crowd that several agencies admitted early on were present at the rally and in the crowds, were inside the capitol building in MAGA Garb before the seditionist rioters broke in, as you claimed in your post.

Link up!

Here's one of several :

Wray was asked point-blank if he had FBI Agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on J6.

'It should be a 'No' - can you tell the American people you had no FBI Agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on J6?'

Wray, under oath during a Congressional hearing, asked this question numerous times, REFUSED TO ANSWER.

Yeah, from Wray, that's a 'YES'!


As I said, there are umetous links - if you really want to find them - to include an FBI agent admitting before committee they had at least 20+ FBI & ATF agents dressed as Trump supporters embedded in the crowd prior to and on J6,to i clude several inside the Capitol.

Of course all of this pales to the fact that none of this would have occurred if Democrats, the FBI, ATF, DHS, and Federal / Local / Capitol Police would not have FAILED to do their job, which was to PREVENT J6 and PROTECT the Capitol.

With more than adequate Intel and months prior to J6 to take action they FAILED to do their jobs.

 
Here's one of several :

Wray was asked point-blank if he had FBI Agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on J6.

'It should be a 'No' - can you tell the American people you had no FBI Agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on J6?'

Wray, under oath during a Congressional hearing, asked this question numerous times, REFUSED TO ANSWER.

Yeah, from Wray, that's a 'YES'!
That doesn’t mean it’s a yes.

That means that the FBI neither wants to confirm nor deny any information to the public about the undercover agents that they may or may not have.
 
No response from BackAgain.

Looks like he ran away AGAIN.
I have never run away. And you’re an impatient little bitch.
Ok, we agree. Here’s what he plead guilty of:

18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).

(c) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.


Now read the bold part. The consequence of their behavior did result in a decision to delay the certification - a decision that you don’t find unreasonable. Thus, these people are guilty of impeding the official proceeding.
I enjoy it when a moron like you tries to one up people who actually do know what they’re talking about.

Let me get you started. Look up what that law means by “corruptly.”

It’s not in bold, you jerk off. But it’s the 2d word.
 
Let me get you started. Look up what that law means by “corruptly.”

It’s not in bold, you jerk off. But it’s the 2d word.
Go ahead. What’s the proper use of the word ”corruptly” and how does that make him innocent of that crime?

Remember the guy who put his feet up on Pelosi’s desk? He went to trial and he was found guilty of the same thing Horn Guy pled guilty to. Explain to us why his situation is different.

 
Go ahead. What’s the proper use of the word ”corruptly” and how does that make him innocent of that crime?

Quitting before you’ve even begun?

You didn’t even bother to look into it? Figures.
Remember the guy who put his feet up on Pelosi’s desk?

Yep.
He went to trial and he was found guilty of the same thing Horn Guy pled guilty to.
Sounds like a miscarriage of Justice. You must be applauding.
Explain to us why his situation is different.
He wore horns?
 

Forum List

Back
Top