IsaacNewton
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2015
- 17,308
- 3,697
- 290
One can only wonder what the charges would have been had Hillary outed an active under-cover CIA agent for political purposes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The good people in the GOP are now in a position to put a finis to Trump either this month at the convention or during the general election. You crazies are looking at catastrophic defeat.Shut the fuck up you waste of bandwidth SOB.....A Republican truthteller as always. Our party has sunk to DP lows. Shameful,What the fuck are you today? A Democrat?As are Republicans.Conservatives are such naive children.
Democrats are such gullible clueless sheep
Question: Do you ever actually READ your posts?
Do you have a point to make or are your ankles stuck in the stirrups of your high horse. You don't have to like reality but you can't expect others to join you in your fantasy world. Sorry.
I'll ask you one more time...Do you actually READ your posts?
I have you to read them. Your welcome.
I thought that it might be "you are" or maybe "you're" but YOUR? Sir Issac Newton would be deeply troubled at your lack of knowledge of the common vernacular
Thank you my personal spell checker, you are on the job! Be sure to proof read all my upcoming posts, you appear to have the time.
Run-on sentence. Bad one too.Be sure to proof read all my upcoming posts, you appear to have the time.
]You shouldn't be getting your jollies off yet because that criminal isn't off the hook yet. She can still be prosecuted those 100+ crimes until she's been pardoned, acquitted or the statute of limitations expires.
Why are you pro-crime anyways?
The good people in the GOP are now in a position to put a finis to Trump either this month at the convention or during the general election. You crazies are looking at catastrophic defeat.Shut the fuck up you waste of bandwidth SOB.....A Republican truthteller as always. Our party has sunk to DP lows. Shameful,What the fuck are you today? A Democrat?As are Republicans.Democrats are such gullible clueless sheep
One can only wonder what the charges would have been had Hillary outed an active under-cover CIA agent for political purposes.
Run-on sentence. Bad one too.Be sure to proof read all my upcoming posts, you appear to have the time.
U.S. Attorney’s Office July 29, 2015
- Eastern District of California (916) 554-2700
SACRAMENTO, CA—Bryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom, pleaded guilty today to unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman immediately sentenced Nishimura to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. Nishimura was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance and to never again seek such a clearance.
According to court documents, Nishimura was a Naval reservist deployed in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008. In his role as a Regional Engineer for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, Nishimura had access to classified briefings and digital records that could only be retained and viewed on authorized government computers. Nishimura, however, caused the materials to be downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices and storage media. He carried such classified materials on his unauthorized media when he traveled off-base in Afghanistan and, ultimately, carried those materials back to the United States at the end of his deployment. In the United States, Nishimura continued to maintain the information on unclassified systems in unauthorized locations, and copied the materials onto at least one additional unauthorized and unclassified system.
Nishimura’s actions came to light in early 2012, when he admitted to Naval personnel that he had handled classified materials inappropriately. Nishimura later admitted that, following his statement to Naval personnel, he destroyed a large quantity of classified materials he had maintained in his home. Despite that, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation searched Nishimura’s home in May 2012, agents recovered numerous classified materials in digital and hard copy forms. The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
This case was the product of an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Jean M. Hobler prosecuted the case.
This content has been reproduced from its original source.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe the difference between the two cases, is that this man went home after confessing to the Navy that he had handled this classified information improperly, and tried to dispose of the evidence and destroyed large quantities of the classified material he maintained at his home, and despite that they still found numerous classified materials in digital AND Hard Copy forms.
Where as Clinton, immediately gave her server and memory disc to the FBI and in to their custody, when they determined these devices had classified material on them.
I'm not certain, but that's the difference I see that could be a reason for the different actions? If the military guy had gathered all of his classified material and handed it over to the proper authorities right after his confession, things may have been different for him?
PLUS, we don't know if the classified material in Clinton's email chains was Military related and critical to the Military's safety, while we do know Military Briefings that this other man retained were military related???
I dunno?
I think the ''and RETENSION'' part is different... I think once they told her the classified was on there, her actions of immediately handing it over and her not trying to destroy any of it as this military reservist tried to do, is the difference.U.S. Attorney’s Office July 29, 2015
- Eastern District of California (916) 554-2700
SACRAMENTO, CA—Bryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom, pleaded guilty today to unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman immediately sentenced Nishimura to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. Nishimura was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance and to never again seek such a clearance.
According to court documents, Nishimura was a Naval reservist deployed in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008. In his role as a Regional Engineer for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, Nishimura had access to classified briefings and digital records that could only be retained and viewed on authorized government computers. Nishimura, however, caused the materials to be downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices and storage media. He carried such classified materials on his unauthorized media when he traveled off-base in Afghanistan and, ultimately, carried those materials back to the United States at the end of his deployment. In the United States, Nishimura continued to maintain the information on unclassified systems in unauthorized locations, and copied the materials onto at least one additional unauthorized and unclassified system.
Nishimura’s actions came to light in early 2012, when he admitted to Naval personnel that he had handled classified materials inappropriately. Nishimura later admitted that, following his statement to Naval personnel, he destroyed a large quantity of classified materials he had maintained in his home. Despite that, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation searched Nishimura’s home in May 2012, agents recovered numerous classified materials in digital and hard copy forms. The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
This case was the product of an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Jean M. Hobler prosecuted the case.
This content has been reproduced from its original source.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe the difference between the two cases, is that this man went home after confessing to the Navy that he had handled this classified information improperly, and tried to dispose of the evidence and destroyed large quantities of the classified material he maintained at his home, and despite that they still found numerous classified materials in digital AND Hard Copy forms.
Where as Clinton, immediately gave her server and memory disc to the FBI and in to their custody, when they determined these devices had classified material on them.
I'm not certain, but that's the difference I see that could be a reason for the different actions? If the military guy had gathered all of his classified material and handed it over to the proper authorities right after his confession, things may have been different for him?
PLUS, we don't know if the classified material in Clinton's email chains was Military related and critical to the Military's safety, while we do know Military Briefings that this other man retained were military related???
I dunno?
And what was he guilty of? unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials,
And Hillary broke laws regarding? unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials,
When did the Democrats become the lap dogs of the 1%?
Yep. And will you be attending Hillary’s coronation, or can't you get tickets?The good people in the GOP are now in a position to put a finis to Trump either this month at the convention or during the general election. You crazies are looking at catastrophic defeat.Shut the fuck up you waste of bandwidth SOB.....A Republican truthteller as always. Our party has sunk to DP lows. Shameful,What the fuck are you today? A Democrat?As are Republicans.Democrats are such gullible clueless sheep
Watch out, he's likely to throw out the word "fallacy" if he is a true intellectual.Run-on sentence. Bad one too.Be sure to proof read all my upcoming posts, you appear to have the time.
Now, Now..let's not be too hard on the fellow. It's clear that he fancies himself "intellectual". Hell, I make grammatical errors often - but then, I'm not "intellectual"![]()
That's the other ding bat, Clayton something.Watch out, he's likely to throw out the word "fallacy" if he is a true intellectual.Run-on sentence. Bad one too.Be sure to proof read all my upcoming posts, you appear to have the time.
Now, Now..let's not be too hard on the fellow. It's clear that he fancies himself "intellectual". Hell, I make grammatical errors often - but then, I'm not "intellectual"![]()
TIR, you folk are part of the indivisible nation. You are going nowhere.
Yeah, another LW "intellectual"That's the other ding bat, Clayton something.Watch out, he's likely to throw out the word "fallacy" if he is a true intellectual.Run-on sentence. Bad one too.Be sure to proof read all my upcoming posts, you appear to have the time.
Now, Now..let's not be too hard on the fellow. It's clear that he fancies himself "intellectual". Hell, I make grammatical errors often - but then, I'm not "intellectual"![]()
Are you serious?I think the ''and RETENSION'' part is different... I think once they told her the classified was on there, her actions of immediately handing it over and her not trying to destroy any of it as this military reservist tried to do, is the difference.U.S. Attorney’s Office July 29, 2015
- Eastern District of California (916) 554-2700
SACRAMENTO, CA—Bryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom, pleaded guilty today to unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman immediately sentenced Nishimura to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. Nishimura was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance and to never again seek such a clearance.
According to court documents, Nishimura was a Naval reservist deployed in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008. In his role as a Regional Engineer for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, Nishimura had access to classified briefings and digital records that could only be retained and viewed on authorized government computers. Nishimura, however, caused the materials to be downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices and storage media. He carried such classified materials on his unauthorized media when he traveled off-base in Afghanistan and, ultimately, carried those materials back to the United States at the end of his deployment. In the United States, Nishimura continued to maintain the information on unclassified systems in unauthorized locations, and copied the materials onto at least one additional unauthorized and unclassified system.
Nishimura’s actions came to light in early 2012, when he admitted to Naval personnel that he had handled classified materials inappropriately. Nishimura later admitted that, following his statement to Naval personnel, he destroyed a large quantity of classified materials he had maintained in his home. Despite that, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation searched Nishimura’s home in May 2012, agents recovered numerous classified materials in digital and hard copy forms. The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
This case was the product of an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Jean M. Hobler prosecuted the case.
This content has been reproduced from its original source.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe the difference between the two cases, is that this man went home after confessing to the Navy that he had handled this classified information improperly, and tried to dispose of the evidence and destroyed large quantities of the classified material he maintained at his home, and despite that they still found numerous classified materials in digital AND Hard Copy forms.
Where as Clinton, immediately gave her server and memory disc to the FBI and in to their custody, when they determined these devices had classified material on them.
I'm not certain, but that's the difference I see that could be a reason for the different actions? If the military guy had gathered all of his classified material and handed it over to the proper authorities right after his confession, things may have been different for him?
PLUS, we don't know if the classified material in Clinton's email chains was Military related and critical to the Military's safety, while we do know Military Briefings that this other man retained were military related???
I dunno?
And what was he guilty of? unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials,
And Hillary broke laws regarding? unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials,
When did the Democrats become the lap dogs of the 1%?
I dont think that that is the record, C4A.I think the ''and RETENSION'' part is different... I think once they told her the classified was on there, her actions of immediately handing it over and her not trying to destroy any of it as this military reservist tried to do, is the difference.