No Missiles For Hezbollah

First prize for the funniest comment so far on this thread goes to LoinBoy who said "Iran hasen't attacked anyone in over 200 years." Bless you princess for all the laughs you give us.

Iranian Troops Attack Kurdish Camps in Iraq
I believe it's you thinking people actually buy in to your dumbass propaganda.

I personally like how you throw out bullshit innuendo's, then "act" like you just made a point.

If I was wrong, then name who they attacked, smartass! What country did their republican guard invade? You wanna fuckin' answer that? Or are we just going to get more bullshit innuendo's that mean absolutely nothing?
 
The attack was illegal and immoral.

Syria did not attack Israel, therefore, Israel had no right to attack Syria.

You fuckers don't deserve a country!

You're a bunch of war-mongering assholes, who enjoy beating up on your neighbors.

But Syria has killed 100,000 of its own people in 2 years.
As long as it is the Muslims killing other Muslims and the Jews are not involved, the anti-Semites close their eyes. Another 100,000 could be killed, and their eyes will still be tightly shut. You really think the anti-Semites actually care about the Arabs

AND the Muslim haters, like you, are always there to cheer Israels war crimes!
 
Duh, are you dense or what? Syria was sending those missiles to Hezbollah who are situated in Southern Lebanon, which is very short distance to major Israeli cities.

No, the Israelis aren't going to wait for a bunch of terrorist animals to get the missiles, and then try to target it. By then they will be carefully hidden. Of course that's exactly what you were hoping for.

Hissy fit?
Was Israel attacked by Syria? No.

Was Israel attacked by Hezbollah? No.

Therefore, it is illegal for Israel to attack them.

Furthermore, Israel does not have the right to decide for other nations what weapons they can (and cannot) have.
 
Israel has the right to war against thoe who attack or would attack it.

Want peace? Syria must control Hezbollah.

Stop the attacks on Israel.
 
Last edited:
Israel has the right to war against thoe who attack or would attack it.

Want peace? Syria must control Hezbollah.

Stop the attacks on Israel.
It hasent started :Yet:
In a month or two we can refer back to this thread, where its plain to see israel attacked syria first, by then there should be a few thousand dead israeli's for you to lament, LOL:eusa_drool:
 
But Syria has killed 100,000 of its own people in 2 years.
As long as it is the Muslims killing other Muslims and the Jews are not involved, the anti-Semites close their eyes. Another 100,000 could be killed, and their eyes will still be tightly shut. You really think the anti-Semites actually care about the Arabs

AND the Muslim haters, like you, are always there to cheer Israels war crimes!

What war crimes? Israel has commited no war crimes. NONE.
 
Israel has the right to war against thoe who attack or would attack it.

Want peace? Syria must control Hezbollah.

Stop the attacks on Israel.
It hasent started :Yet:
In a month or two we can refer back to this thread, where its plain to see israel attacked syria first, by then there should be a few thousand dead israeli's for you to lament, LOL:eusa_drool:

It better not start either. Worry about your own side and MYOB.
 
As long as it is the Muslims killing other Muslims and the Jews are not involved, the anti-Semites close their eyes. Another 100,000 could be killed, and their eyes will still be tightly shut. You really think the anti-Semites actually care about the Arabs

AND the Muslim haters, like you, are always there to cheer Israels war crimes!

What war crimes? Israel has commited no war crimes. NONE.


According to the legal code of ISA-REPECTERS ---aka SHARIAH---
neither jews nor christians can be armed at all ----sometimes there
are exceptions if jews or christians end up fighting as allies of
the ARMIES OF ALLAH----against the ENEMEEEEES OF ISLAAAAM
---but such circumstances are historically very rare ----someone
can find those rare exceptions and true to form would logically
insist that the exceptions prove my statement false----
nope----it is true
 
What war crimes? Israel has commited no war crimes. NONE.
Haven't committed a war crime? Dude, you couldn't be more wrong!

They launched an un-provoked attack against a sovereign nation and that has been codified in the Nuremberg Principles as a "war of aggression", the highest crime a nation can commit.

Nuremberg principles

The Nuremberg principles were a set of guidelines for determining what constitutes a war crime.

Principle VI

"The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace: (i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;​
And the treaty in this case is Article 51 of the UN Charter which prohibits attacking another country with military force unless it is in self-defense or has the authorization of the UNSC. Israel had neither. They just "chose" to bomb Syria. And a "war of choice", is a "war of aggression", no different than the nazis going into Poland.

I love how all you fuckers just keep making excuses after excuses on why you have to attack other nations and I'm here to tell ya, people are getting sick of it! These air-strikes make people wanna wipe Israel out and that's no ones fault but Israel's.

And I don't appreciate you fuckers bombing Syria just to drag my country into a war that could lead to the end of all life on planet earth. Russia has already stated they will not allow Syria to fall out of their sphere of influence. That is the line in the sand they have drawn and Israel's own arrogance is going to get them in trouble, because Russia is out of their weight class. It would be like a middle weight (Israel) trying to fight a heavyweight (Russia). But who knows, maybe Russia won't wipe Israel out. Maybe they'll just make Israel their little bitch!
 
Duh, are you dense or what? Syria was sending those missiles to Hezbollah who are situated in Southern Lebanon, which is very short distance to major Israeli cities.

No, the Israelis aren't going to wait for a bunch of terrorist animals to get the missiles, and then try to target it. By then they will be carefully hidden. Of course that's exactly what you were hoping for.

Hissy fit?
Was Israel attacked by Syria? No.

Was Israel attacked by Hezbollah? No.

Therefore, it is illegal for Israel to attack them.

Furthermore, Israel does not have the right to decide for other nations what weapons they can (and cannot) have.
A condemned genocidal regime arming a terrorist group with missiles that can kill tens of thousands of Israelis is an act of war in itself.

International legal expert, you're not. Ha ha ha.
 
Israel has the right to war against thoe who attack or would attack it.

Want peace? Syria must control Hezbollah.

Stop the attacks on Israel.
It hasent started :Yet:
In a month or two we can refer back to this thread, where its plain to see israel attacked syria first, by then there should be a few thousand dead israeli's for you to lament, LOL:eusa_drool:
Or we might see the entire southern part of Lebanon turned into a parking lot again. Ask Nasrallah if he liked the new aholes Israel ripped into him after the last operation. Baz zer zadi heyvoun? Chos. :clap:
 
Last edited:
Oh for goodness sake, calm down Princess. You'll give yourself a stroke or something. Now look, we all know you are not exactly among the brightest among us but seriously I wish you well with your reading disorder. Even the link is titled --- "Iranian Troops Attack Kurdish Camps in Iraq." Have you not ever heard of Iraq? Does that answer your question?


First prize for the funniest comment so far on this thread goes to LoinBoy who said "Iran hasen't attacked anyone in over 200 years." Bless you princess for all the laughs you give us.

Iranian Troops Attack Kurdish Camps in Iraq
I believe it's you thinking people actually buy in to your dumbass propaganda.

I personally like how you throw out bullshit innuendo's, then "act" like you just made a point.

If I was wrong, then name who they attacked, smartass! What country did their republican guard invade? You wanna fuckin' answer that? Or are we just going to get more bullshit innuendo's that mean absolutely nothing?
 

good war porn

raw video of israeli airstrike in syria

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f_j8ID-m1pU]?????? 5-5-2013 ??? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ???????? - YouTube[/ame]
Did you notice the Arabs in the background praising the strike with "Allah Akbar!" Unreal.

Thanks for showing this video of Israel being the only country to help the Syrian people out, when our president is checking to see if he has balls down there.

AllahuAkbar Israel! Ha ha ha.
Which "Syrian People" are you helping?

"Testimony from victims of the Syrian conflict suggests rebels have used the nerve agent sarin, according to a leading United Nations investigator.

"Carla del Ponte told Swiss TV there were 'strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof'.

"However, she said her panel had not yet seen evidence of government forces using chemical weapons."

BBC News - Syria crisis: UN's Del Ponte says evidence rebels 'used sarin'

The Jewish state was created to ensure violence like what we see today from Lebanon to Libya to Syria to Boston.
 
georgephillip; et al,

It is not about "competition."


(COMMENT)

It is about the character of the conflict and the metal behind the behavior of the people. It demonstrates what your cause is and what you really think the role of the people is.

Hezbollah, Iran, the Assad Government and the Shia Ba'athist Party on one side; supported by the Palestinian and Lebanese People.

--- Versus ---

The Syrian People and the Right to Self-Determination and Democratic Rule

It is about what you believe in. What do you believe in?

Most Respectfully,
R
Honestly, Rocco, I believe you've presented something of a false dichotomy with the choice you've offered me: I don't believe the Syrian People are anything more than pawns in this particular match. Not unlike civilians in Afghanistan or Fallujah.

I believe Empire functions more profitably when facing a balkanized opposition.
I believe Syria will be carved up in such a manner as to reduce its threat level to the US and Israel.
And frankly I wouldn't be surprised if elements of our CIA were arming and training Salafist forces in Syria today in much the same way they created al-Qa'aida during Carter's last days.

I guess this is where my belief starts:

"The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives is one of the major works of Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski graduated with a PhD from Harvard University in 1953 and became Professor of American Foreign Policy at Johns Hopkins University before becoming the United States National Security Advisor from 1977 - 1981 under the administration of President Jimmy Carter.

"Regarding the landmass of Eurasia as the center of global power, Brzezinski sets out to formulate a Eurasian geostrategy for the United States.

"In particular, he writes, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger should emerge capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America's global pre-eminence."

The Grand Chessboard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It certainly looks like Georgie Boy never misses an opportunity to blame the U.S. for something or other. Never would he think, inasmuch as we have seen so many Arabs countries have uprisings recently, that perhaps the Syrians wanted to have theirs too and get rid of their leader. Meanwhile, of course, the radical Muslims are coming into the mix and they want to make Syria an Islamic country which of course is not the aim of those rebels who started this uprising. Of course leave it to Georgie Boy to claim that some in the CIA was arming and training these extremist Muslims. Tell us, Georgie Boy, is the CIA behind the extremists who are trying to take over in Morocco these days?
I wonder if you want to know who the CIA has been arming and training since Ziggy left DC?
Sibel Edmonds has some hypothesis that seem to connect a few dots:

"With the approaching Finale for Syria’s Assad the Uber-Neocon architects of US foreign policy have been hard at work. Assuming (albeit knowingly) the certainty of the soon-to-come end for Assad’s government, the neocon architects are drafting and crafting their objectives for the Post-Assad regime in Syria.

"I know the mainstream and pseudo-alternative media use the term 'Neocon' loosely and willy-nilly, but I can assure you this is not the case with my usage of 'Uber-Neocons’ here. You will see that clearly after reading the following facts.

"Yesterday I found this ‘interesting’ article in the Turkish newspaper Zaman [All Emphasis Mine]: Read more ?..."

Sibel Edmonds' Boiling Frogs Post | Home of the Irate Minority
 

Forum List

Back
Top