No, Muslims Should NOT Be Allowed To Serve In Public Office

[protectionist]

There is no requirement to take an oath on anything!

Why are you so fucking stupid?

Why are YOU so fucking stupid ?

I didn't say anything about "requirement". YOU did.

 

[Rigby5]

If it were real, the signs would not likely be in English, would they?

They would, and are.

Not only would they be in Farsi or the local language, but would not all be identical shape, size, color, and typeface.
It is clearly a Photoshop.
Real signs would be in the local language and hand written.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

You are free to like or dislike anything you want, but all people deserve representation, including religions you do not like.
So you can't discriminate against anyone based on their religion.

But we (by the Constitution) discriminate against Muslims based on their looney supremacist ideology (masquerading as a religion)

Hmm..eh..Muslims aren't alone in Supremacist beliefs,
nor actually really wrong for Supremacist beliefs.

 

[Rigby5]

Or how about SAWING living human beings HEADS OFF? Ya... that's ISLAM... what a LOVELY bunch of EVIL, straight from the halls of HELL...

Wrong again.
but it says that the purpose of that is because an ax or heavy sword can do it the quickest and least painful.
Using a knife is totally against the Quran then.
So then this has to be ISIS, which is known for being the opposite of Islam.
ISIS is a fake organization created by the US, to try to make Muslims look bad.
Again, not a single Muslim cleric supports ISIS.

The Quran says that beheading is the only legal means of execution,

Let's see the verses that say that.

There are dozens, but all can be interpreted as one wishes.
So lets just go back to logic.
What is the quickest and most painless means of execution?
It is NOT the electric chair, (which ensures the most pain possible), or the gas chamber, (with slow suffocation). It is the guillotine. It is fastest and leaves the least sensory mechanism in place.
Clearly being merciful was the intent of the Quran.
And clearly ISIS is not Muslim, at all or in any way.

I have posted truths about Islam. Which, if any, can you prove are wrong? Stop deflecting and deal with what Islam says not what you think it says. The Koran is to be taken literally, it says so itself. Now explain why the hate is not hate with Islamic sources, not Wikipedia. I do not think you know enough to handle that. Your posts prove it.

You posted nonsense deliberately extracted out of context.
I added context to the 9th surrah because that is the most common one falsely lied about.
So pick one at a time and I will explain it to you.
I am not going to do your whole list at once, because it would take way too much time, and it would be buried anyway.

 

[Rigby5]

2:191-194 Religion is for Allah..."
2:216-218 "Fighting is Ordained for You Though You Dislike It..."
2:244 "Fight in the Way of Allah..."
3:28, 5:51 "Take Not the Jews and Christians as Friends..."
3:56 "Disbelievers Will Be Punished in This World..."
3:151 "We Shall Cast Terror into the Hearts of Those Who Disbelieve..."
4:74 "Sell the Life of This World for the Hereafter..."
4:89 "If They Turn Away, Seize Them and Kill Them..."
4:95 "Not Equal are the Believers Who Sit at Home and Those Who Fight for Allah..."
4:104 "And Do Not Be Weak in Pursuit of the Enemy..."
5:33 "Those Who Do Mischief in the Land Shall be Killed or Crucified..."
8:12 "I will Cast Terror into the Hearts of Those who Disbelieve... Strike off Their Heads..."
8:39 "Fight Them Until There is No More Fitna and Religion Be Only for Allah..."
8:59-60 "Make Ready Against [the Disbelievers] All Steeds of War..."
9:5 "Slay the Idolaters Wherever You Find Them..."
9:29 "Fight Those Who Believe Not in Allah..."
9:30 "They Say 'Son of God', May Allah Destroy Them..."
9:38-42 "If You March Not Forth, He Will Punish You With a Painful Torment..."
9:73 (9:88, 9:11) "Strive Hard Against the Unbelievers and Hypocrites and Be Unyielding..."
9:123 "Fight Those of the Unbelievers Who are Near to You..."
18:65-81 "They Proceeded, Till They Met a Boy, Whom He Killed..."
47:4 "When You Meet Those Who Disbelieve, Smite Them at Their Necks..."
47:35 "Be Not Faint-Hearted, Crying for Peace When You Should Be Uppermost..."
61:4 "Surely Allah Loves Those Who Fight in His Way..."
61:9 "He Sent Muhammad to Make Islam Superior over All Other Religion..."
66:9 "Strive Hard Against the Disbelievers and Be Severe Against Them..."

All totally out of context.
Like the 9th Surrah that is often quoted.
The actual title for that one is Forgiveness and Redemption.
It ONLY talks about killing them AFTER they have broken treaties and tried to kill you twice.
Only then are you supposed to kill them where ever they try to hide.
The context always says that making peace is to be preferred.

All totally out of context.

The Koran has no context. It is contradictions, repetition, and babble. The Hadith brings the context to the Koran. And we see plenty of hate for non-Muslims as anyone would that reads it.

No, what you see in the Quran is brotherhood with Jews and Christians, and defensive measures.
You see no hate at all.
The Quran does have some contradictions, but that is due to change over time, and you are supposed to go with the later points.
It is repetition because it comes from events, and history tends to repeat.
Hadiths are scholars discussion, not Mohammad.

 

[protectionist]

3. The guy who you voted for has all the bad characteristics of a bad human : Liar, Cheater, conman, adulterer, bully, sexist, womanizer, asshole.....that says a lot about your character. So please save us the moral talk.

So you wish to let us know that your programming by the leftist media is 100% complete. Message received.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

The Quran is easy to read, and it contains not a single passage promoting hate or unnecessary violence.
It is a bit strict in my opinion, but clearly condemns any theft of murder.
And the proof is that Muslims are not the ones carving up the world into empires.
That is mostly the US now, and used to be Gt. Britain, France. and Spain at one time.

It is cover to cover hate and unnecessary violence (jihad). It advocates (if not commands) mass murder/genocide.

Rigby is aware of how pathetically ignorant many of the people in this thread are about Islam, and he is taking full advantage.

Muslims (ISIS) were carving up the world, and then along came Trump.

1.) Islam isn't great & doesn't belong in Western society.

2.) Islam is far from being the #1 issue.

3.) Islamic nations are natural allies for Western Nationalists because of the values & agenda being close.

4.) You & your ilk are therefor ignorant... You have been manipulated by the Kosher Globalists to be mostly pro- Kosher & anti- Islamic.
They have manipulated the idiots...indeed.

5.) The Globalists are the worst...They are the Commies & they will be the death of America & Western Culture.

 

[protectionist]

At this point, I don't really know why anyone should respond to you.

You are an EPIC LIAR.

I aid exactly that yesterday. But he's worse than an epic liar. He's a MUSLIM, JIHADIST, TAQIYYA LIAR.

 

[protectionist]

Not only would they be in Farsi or the local language, but would not all be identical shape, size, color, and typeface.
It is clearly a Photoshop.
Real signs would be in the local language and hand written.

NOPE. The signs would be in language of the people that these creeps intended then to be read by > Americans. And signs can be cheaply made by computers and printers, You're screwing this up, Mohammed.

 

[Pogo]

It is fascinating to watch the same people that talk about the 2nd Amendment all the time want to ignore most of the rest of them.

These people hate our Constitution and yet claim to love the country...despite the fact those two things are mutually exclusive

Republicans are the only ones who even pretend to give the Constitution lip service.

Try to pretend you have a 1st amendment in fucking Portland or Berkeley, I dare you.

Highlighting yet again how alike the wingers are...left wing or right wing...same damn bird.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No because in Republican controlled areas freedom of speech and every Constitutional amendment still exists.

You'll need to make that case to the OP, who claims Republicans --- that's ALL Republicans --- oppose that Constitution.

As already noted that Constitution was drawn up and ratified with zero Republicans. That's because they were all stuck at the Fort McHendry airport before Washington took them back from Cornwallis of Yorktown and the Very Fine People from a wonderful place in Germany. Believe me.

Try staying on topic useful idiot. A job you half qualify for.

The OP, BY DEFINITION, ***IS*** the topic, dumb shit.

 

[Pogo]

You'll need to make that case to the OP, who claims Republicans --- that's ALL Republicans --- oppose that Constitution.

As already noted that Constitution was drawn up and ratified with zero Republicans. That's because they were all stuck at the Fort McHendry airport before Washington took them back from Cornwallis of Yorktown and the Very Fine People from a wonderful place in Germany. Believe me.

I didn't say that Republicans oppose the Constitution. They don't. But Democrats and their Muslim buddies do.

The hell you didn't. And we already did this.

YOUR OP:

I'm now answering that by saying No, Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not.

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE:

>> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. <<

The first CONTRADICTS the second. Moreover you've accused an entire body of people of the same contempt of the Constitution that you have, with no licence whatsoever to speak for them.

 

[Issa]

3. The guy who you voted for has all the bad characteristics of a bad human : Liar, Cheater, conman, adulterer, bully, sexist, womanizer, asshole.....that says a lot about your character. So please save us the moral talk.

So you wish to let us know that your programming by the leftist media is 100% complete. Message received.

Dont need no media...trump is an asshole so are his followers. These forums is a proof of it as well.

 

[Desperado]

Goes with saying. A muslim will put sharia law above the US Constitution. Making them traitorous to begin with

 

[ph3iron]

A year ago, there was a thread entitled >> "Do Republicans believe a Muslim should be allowed to serve in public office if elected?" I'm now answering that by saying No, Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. Furthermore, no American should be OK with Muslims serving in public office.

First of all, in America, Islam is sedition, by virtue of it's supremacism, which is in violation of the Constitution (article 6, section 2, part 1-the Supremacy Clause).

Secondly, Islam is an ideology (masquerading as a religion), which advocates (if not commands) the violation of scores of US laws, including some of the most serious felonies (ex. murder, rape, pedophilia, slavery, sex discrimination)

Not only should Muslims not be part of government in America, but Islam should not exist in America, period. There should be no mosques, no Korans, no Islamic centers, etc

So stupid.
They have been here since inception.
Ban the iPhone inventor too
Still admiring Ike the woman cheater I see?
And who do most crimes? White supremists or Muslim ,s?
Not even close
Try to open your mind

 

[ph3iron]

A

Goex with saying. A muslim will put sharia law above the US Constitution. Making them traitorous to begin with

Another trump u pantywaist

 

[ph3iron]

You know what, let's throw out the Jews too. And the Eye-talians. And the Micks. And Bohunks, and Dwarfs, and Limeys and Hungarians. Catholics? Gotta go. Injuns? Send 'em back where they came from. Chinee, Japs, Canooks, all yesterday. Germans, ship 'em out.

Seen this movie before. Wait'll you see how it ends.

One little problem with your post. Those ethnics don't have a KORAN. Try harder.

Yeah, I DO know what. You don't.

Man talk about a twisted mind.
Nazis fine Koran NG

 

[Pogo]

Goex with saying. A muslim will put sharia law above the US Constitution. Making them traitorous to begin with

Unfortunately posting hallucinations on the internets doesn't make them into a real thing.

But I like the turned-around phrase "goes with saying". Nice touch.

 

[ph3iron]

A year ago, there was a thread entitled >> "Do Republicans believe a Muslim should be allowed to serve in public office if elected?" I'm now answering that by saying No, Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. Furthermore, no American should be OK with Muslims serving in public office.

First of all, in America, Islam is sedition, by virtue of it's supremacism, which is in violation of the Constitution (article 6, section 2, part 1-the Supremacy Clause).

Secondly, Islam is an ideology (masquerading as a religion), which advocates (if not commands) the violation of scores of US laws, including some of the most serious felonies (ex. murder, rape, pedophilia, slavery, sex discrimination)

Not only should Muslims not be part of government in America, but Islam should not exist in America, period. There should be no mosques, no Korans, no Islamic centers, etc

I guess you know they are better educated and earn more than people like me and you.
And they are paying for your socialist benefits so be grateful.
Might increase our collective IQ.
And what has the Koran done to you again?
Attacking your double wide?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

There is no requirement to take an oath on anything!

Why are you so fucking stupid?

Why are YOU so fucking stupid ?

I didn't say anything about "requirement". YOU did.

You just destroyed your own point!

What an incredible dumbass you are!

 

[ph3iron]

Tough shit for you, huh

For America, yup.

In our multi PhDs opinion?
Got any examples?