No, Muslims Should NOT Be Allowed To Serve In Public Office

Status
Not open for further replies.
A year ago, there was a thread entitled >> "Do Republicans believe a Muslim should be allowed to serve in public office if elected?" I'm now answering that by saying No, Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. Furthermore, no American should be OK with Muslims serving in public office.

First of all, in America, Islam is sedition, by virtue of it's supremacism, which is in violation of the Constitution (article 6, section 2, part 1-the Supremacy Clause).

Secondly, Islam is an ideology (masquerading as a religion), which advocates (if not commands) the violation of scores of US laws, including some of the most serious felonies (ex. murder, rape, pedophilia, slavery, sex discrimination)

Not only should Muslims not be part of government in America, but Islam should not exist in America, period. There should be no mosques, no Korans, no Islamic centers, etc
"No, Muslims Should NOT Be Allowed To Serve In Public Office"

Scratch a conservative, find a bigot.
So you call the Constitution >>" a bigot" ? Yes, you do.

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
 
You should know mr Ike womanizer admirer.
Jealous of his and dons vagina grabbing?
They pay taxes Darlin for your commie SS Medicare benefits (which I presume you have returned)?
So what has the dreaded muslims done to you again?
Invented your universities?
Math?
Toothbrushes?
Cleanliness?
10 Things You Use Every Day That Are Invented by Muslims
1. You have zero evidence that either Ike or Don ever grabbed anyone's vagina.

2. I don't receive a dime from medicare. My medical care comes from the VA (all free)

3. Who cares what a Muslim invented ? What matters is their supremacist ideology, outlawed by Article 6 , Section 2, part 1 of the Constitution, and the scores of other US laws their ideology tells them to break.

Strike 1…….Strike 2......Strike 3.
You mean christians don't have a supremist ideology?
You're kidding.?
Well you must be the only person in amErica who hasn't seen dons video bragging about it.
His latest about his 2 man party with Epstein and 28 women I guess you haven't seen either
Ike in the uk was famous. I guess you haven't seen the pics of him and mistress on vacation.
He ignored her on retiring to the usa to his faithful wife and she died pennyless
great guy
VA, hilarious, an even bigger socialist program. Paid by my and Muslim taxes
Refusing that?
please try to read the bibles dumb comments.
It's called both sides
Enjoy your commie VA
 
A year ago, there was a thread entitled >> "Do Republicans believe a Muslim should be allowed to serve in public office if elected?" I'm now answering that by saying No, Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. Furthermore, no American should be OK with Muslims serving in public office.

First of all, in America, Islam is sedition, by virtue of it's supremacism, which is in violation of the Constitution (article 6, section 2, part 1-the Supremacy Clause).

Secondly, Islam is an ideology (masquerading as a religion), which advocates (if not commands) the violation of scores of US laws, including some of the most serious felonies (ex. murder, rape, pedophilia, slavery, sex discrimination)

Not only should Muslims not be part of government in America, but Islam should not exist in America, period. There should be no mosques, no Korans, no Islamic centers, etc
"No, Muslims Should NOT Be Allowed To Serve In Public Office"

Scratch a conservative, find a bigot.
So you call the Constitution >>" a bigot" ? Yes, you do.

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
Even worse
"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundel"
"People who are too dumb to get a real job join the military. Great indoctrination (seen in spades here) and socialist benefits"
 
You mean christians don't have a supremist ideology?
You're kidding.?
Well you must be the only person in amErica who hasn't seen dons video bragging about it.
His latest about his 2 man party with Epstein and 28 women I guess you haven't seen either
Ike in the uk was famous. I guess you haven't seen the pics of him and mistress on vacation.
He ignored her on retiring to the usa to his faithful wife and she died pennyless
great guy
VA, hilarious, an even bigger socialist program. Paid by my and Muslim taxes
Refusing that?
please try to read the bibles dumb comments.
It's called both sides
Enjoy your commie VA
That's right, I mean Christians don't have a supremacist ideology. But then I'm not indoctriated by CNN/MSNBC/PBS. :biggrin:

I'm more intersested in Don's GDP, unemployment, and median wage records.

I'm more interested in Ike's Operation Wetback, and building of the US interstate highway system.

I'm cool with the VA. You're not ? Another attribute of America haters.

I have no need to read the Bible.

I'm enjoying my marvelous, patriotic VA, with 100% free medical coverage. If you would have served, you could be enjoying it too, coward.
 
Last edited:
Even worse
"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundel"
"People who are too dumb to get a real job join the military. Great indoctrination (seen in spades here) and socialist benefits"
The scoundrels are the ones who say >> "Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel"

People who are too cowardly to join the military, and too dumb to get a real job, play the system for welfare benefits$$.
 
Only a neo Nazi scum bag would post such an evil and un-American thread.
Only an AIRHEAD, IGNORANT, UNREAD BUBBLEHEAD would post such a mindless and un-American post.

Actually I'm not any of those which you so angrily purported to define me; in fact nothing you post is rational.

You are a hater, and your anger and hate is pathological and repudiates all that this nation seeks to achieve.

No where is this more true than in the Preamble, a vision statement left to the future, and a mission statement for the leadership of the USA - sadly, a vote for trump also repudiates that vision and that mission.
 
You should know that I don't watch TV and don't read the hair-on-fire blogs that spews all this shit.

I do however read history, which is why I called out the OP for exactly what he's doing, and several of its historical parallels, in my first post here as the first order of business. That point stands.

I don't wanna hear about da eebil Jews, da eebil Germans, da eebil Chinese, da eebil Irish, da eebil Eye-talians, da eebil Mexicans, da eebil Catholics, da eebil Presbyterians, da eebil Brazilians, da eebil Danes, da eebil blondes, da eebil Sagittarians, or whatever the Emmanuel Goldstein is next week. K? That childish shit played out a long time ago.
Too much form. No content. :biggrin:
 
Actually I'm not any of those which you so angrily purported to define me; in fact nothing you post is rational.

You are a hater, and your anger and hate is pathological and repudiates all that this nation seeks to achieve.

No where is this more true than in the Preamble, a vision statement left to the future, and a mission statement for the leadership of the USA - sadly, a vote for trump also repudiates that vision and that mission.
Like I said >> "AIRHEAD, IGNORANT, UNREAD BUBBLEHEAD"

No need to confirm. We got it clear the first time.

Yes I hate. I hate > hate. aka Islam. Only question is, why don't you ? Not informed enough ? Not informed about Constitution Article 6, Section 2, part 1 ? the Explanatory Memorandum ? Koran 4:34 ? Koran 8:12 ? etc, etc

PS - if you were the spouse or child of one of these victims, would you be "angry" ?

Fort-Hood-Victims-082813.jpg
 
Last edited:
Perhaps.

But there are far too many Republicans and others on the right who sound just like the OP.
The question might be >> why don't you? But I know the answer > IGNORANCE, caused by liberal OMISSION media, Liberal OMMISION "education", and liberal OMISSION think tanks.

When I presented liberals with my Islamization Quiz, which I made up from my readings, they all failed miserably. They know little or nothing about Islam and its relation to the Constitution, little or nothing about the Koran, little or nothing about Obama's or Hillary's Muslim Brotherhood connections, or the MB's Explanatory Memorandum.

The highest grade any of them ever got on this quiz was 10%. Most got zero.
 
I have to slightly disagree. Freedom of religion is fundamental in our law. I have no problem with people wanting to worship Mohammad, but a basic premise of being American is in adopting and supporting the American way of life and by doing so, the American Justice System. Sharia Law is a legal system all its own wholly incompatible with western law as first set for by Justinian's Code of Civil Law followed latter by Common Law set forth by Henry II and carried forward to today. The problem here occurs just as it does for Latinos like AOC and Esteban when they get into office and start representing the interests of a group of people outside the USA instead of America itself, likewise, the problem with Muslim faith is not intrinsic to the faith itself until they decide to adopt a legal system in conflict with the country they live in.
You have no disagreement with me about freedom of religion.
 
I live in an area with a substantial Muslim population, along with other people of varying religions and ethnicities. I do not understand your assertion that Muslims do not assimilate well into American society. Why would you say such a thing? Me: last trip to one of our local grocery stores, owned by ethnic Koreans, assisted in finding what I wanted by a Spanish-speaking person, my purchases rung up and bagged by a woman in a Muslim headscarf.
Perhaps your lack of understanding as you put it, is due to a lack of information.

Are you aware of THIS >> "The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a "Civilization-Jihadist" process with all that the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood in North America] must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" their miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated, and Allah's religion is made victorious over all religions."

Mohamed Akram, "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" May 22, 1991, Government Exhibit 003-0085, United States vs. Holy Land Foundation, et al. 7 (21).

Or THIS >> Koran 4:34. (wife-beating)

Or THIS >> "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
 
As a Muslim I say I'm glad me and millions of American muslims like me, chose to be surgeons, engineers, businessmen, firefighters, policemen, teachers, CIA operatives, FBI agents, athletes, and everything else in between and not spend our time worrying about the bigots of the right and what they think about us.
A real Muslim follows every word of the Koran. Do you ?
 
There are far too many bigots on all sides, but that has nothing to do with the OP's false claim of representing Republican positions.
I didn't say I represented them. I said they don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. That's true, Generally, overwhelmingly, that is how Republicans feel, and of course they're correct. How can you have people in a governments office whose ideology vows to destroy that government ? And whose ideology advocated the commission of many serious felony crimes ? (wife-beating, rape, murder, pedophilia, slavery, sex discrimination, etc)

Like it or not, Islam is a supremacism, which the Constitution's supremacy clause bans.
 
As for Muslims most I've met have been polite, mild mannered & pleasant.
That's what they said about the Muslim terrorists before they committed massacres.

Omar Mateen, the Pulse Club killer, was even a licensed security guard in Florida, and was trusted to carry a gun on the job. Everybody thought he was a fine fellow.
 
Last edited:
As a Muslim I say I'm glad me and millions of American muslims like me, chose to be surgeons, engineers, businessmen, firefighters, policemen, teachers, CIA operatives, FBI agents, athletes, and everything else in between and not spend our time worrying about the bigots of the right and what they think about us.
A real Muslim follows every word of the Koran. Do you ?
It depends. Spit your question.
 
There are far too many bigots on all sides, but that has nothing to do with the OP's false claim of representing Republican positions.
I didn't say I represented them. I said they don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. That's true,....


It is not true. It is your own personal, unAmerican fear and weakness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top