goldcatt
Catch me if you can!
- Aug 4, 2009
- 10,330
- 3,039
You tell me no, and then go on to state what I just did to you, in not so many words.![]()
As you well know, when there is question as to what a section and clause mean, legislative intent is used.
Face it Counselor. Your position (such as it is) is not as clearcut and dogmatic as you first espoused.![]()
Legislative intent? What legislature?
Your particular brand of interpretation may look to original intent as the arbiter of meaning, but yours is only one of many.
And no, I am generally not dogmatic. Dogma is for sissies who can't think for themselves.[/QUOTE]
As to sissies...you are the one that wears skirts and dresses Counselor, not me.
And dogmatic does not actually mean what you tried to pass off just now.
* Main Entry: dog·mat·ic
* Pronunciation: \dȯg-ˈma-tik, däg-\
* Variant(s): also dog·mat·i·cal \-ti-kəl\
* Function: adjective
* Date: 1660
1 : characterized by or given to the expression of opinions very strongly or positively as if they were facts <a dogmatic critic>
2 : of or relating to dogma
synonyms see dictatorial
dog·mat·i·cal·ly \-ti-k(ə-)lē\ adverb
dog·mat·i·cal·ness \-ti-kəl-nəs\ noun
Being distracted has gotten the best of you tonight Counselor.![]()
"Dictatorial"?
Watch it buster.![]()