No Negotiations Until Federal Gov Opens

[The Original Tree]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

One problem is Trump has never laid down a concise plan of what he wants border security to be and why

Specify which sections require solid wall, where fencing is needed and where electronic surveillance is preferred. Then provide costs

Instead, we get one size fits all......wall, wall, wall

Concise plans cost money, which Congress hasn't approved yet. Once again, the anti-wall douchebags are making demands that are impossible to comply with.

The Wall was approved in 2006. Democrats refuse to release the money for it already appropriated.

 

[iceberg]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

 

[MisterBeale]

Let's just get rid of the Federal Government and leave border enforcement to the several states that border Mexico.


Problem solved.

Really?

CA would install a gigantic vacuums to pull everyone down to the equator into their State

Probably. But then Arizona, Nevada, and Idaho would start construction on a wall.

 

[iceberg]

Let's just get rid of the Federal Government and leave border enforcement to the several states that border Mexico.


Problem solved.

Really?

CA would install a gigantic vacuums to pull everyone down to the equator into their State

Probably. But then Arizona, Nevada, and Idaho would start construction on a wall.

now THAT i'd donate to.

 

[Crepitus]

Let's just get rid of the Federal Government and leave border enforcement to the several states that border Mexico.


Problem solved.

Leave organizing a major project like that to Texas conservitards?

Now there's a recipe for disaster.

 

[iceberg]

Let's just get rid of the Federal Government and leave border enforcement to the several states that border Mexico.


Problem solved.

Leave organizing a major project like that to Texas conservitards?

Now there's a recipe for disaster.

speaking of people only existing to cause disruption...

 

[The Original Tree]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

He has The Constitutional Rights to Declare a National Emergency and Appropriate Funds to Address it.

Congress is Criminally Negligent in addressing this threat to our Country.

Report: 4 ISIS Terrorists Caught at Southern Border in 36 Hrs

This morning, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, was asked about the latest Judicial Watch report by Steve Doocy.

McCaul said he has not been able to confirm the report, saying DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

He said his "blueprint" calls for the deployment of new technology and aviation assets, including re-purposing equipment from the Afghanistan war after U.S. forces start to leave.

Watch McCaul's interview above and Hunter's appearance on "OTR" below.

 

[bripat9643]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

So, effectively, you only object when Republicans try to go around the Constitution. The Dims have free reign.

 

[iceberg]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

So, effectively, you only object when Republicans try to go around the Constitution. The Dims have free reign.

speaking of extreme viewpoints bypassing the million shades of gray between black and white...

*ANY FUCKING GOD DAMN PRESIDENT* taking short cuts through our processes.

you need to stop the selective reading jump to stupid conclusions habit you have.

 

[bripat9643]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

One problem is Trump has never laid down a concise plan of what he wants border security to be and why

Specify which sections require solid wall, where fencing is needed and where electronic surveillance is preferred. Then provide costs

Instead, we get one size fits all......wall, wall, wall

Concise plans cost money, which Congress hasn't approved yet. Once again, the anti-wall douchebags are making demands that are impossible to comply with.

Money? Mexico isn’t paying for it?

Why do you insist on confirming your idiocy?

I was told by the blob that Mexico was going to pay for the wall. Why do you insist on calling the blob a liar?

The sure sign that someone is an idiot is that they think that whining about Mexico paying for the wall is a good argument.

 

[The Original Tree]

Let's just get rid of the Federal Government and leave border enforcement to the several states that border Mexico.


Problem solved.

Leave organizing a major project like that to Texas conservitards?

Now there's a recipe for disaster.

speaking of people only existing to cause disruption...

Atzlan, LaRaza, AntiFa, NOW, BLM, Move On Dot Org.

 

[iceberg]

One problem is Trump has never laid down a concise plan of what he wants border security to be and why

Specify which sections require solid wall, where fencing is needed and where electronic surveillance is preferred. Then provide costs

Instead, we get one size fits all......wall, wall, wall

Concise plans cost money, which Congress hasn't approved yet. Once again, the anti-wall douchebags are making demands that are impossible to comply with.

Money? Mexico isn’t paying for it?

Why do you insist on confirming your idiocy?

I was told by the blob that Mexico was going to pay for the wall. Why do you insist on calling the blob a liar?

The sure sign that someone is an idiot is that they think that whining about Mexico paying for the wall is a good argument.

sure sign of an idiot is someone that keeps arguing with an idiot.

have a nice day.

 

[bripat9643]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

So, effectively, you only object when Republicans try to go around the Constitution. The Dims have free reign.

speaking of extreme viewpoints bypassing the million shades of gray between black and white...

*ANY FUCKING GOD DAMN PRESIDENT* taking short cuts through our processes.

you need to stop the selective reading jump to stupid conclusions habit you have.

Yeah, because we all know you complained when Obama ignored the Constitution . . . NOT!

 

[iceberg]

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

So, effectively, you only object when Republicans try to go around the Constitution. The Dims have free reign.

speaking of extreme viewpoints bypassing the million shades of gray between black and white...

*ANY FUCKING GOD DAMN PRESIDENT* taking short cuts through our processes.

you need to stop the selective reading jump to stupid conclusions habit you have.

Yeah, because we all know you complained when Obama ignored the Constitution . . . NOT!

see my join date? i wasn't here.

your powers of observation astound me.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

He has The Constitutional Rights to Declare a National Emergency and Appropriate Funds to Address it.

Congress is Criminally Negligent in addressing this threat to our Country.

Report: 4 ISIS Terrorists Caught at Southern Border in 36 Hrs

This morning, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, was asked about the latest Judicial Watch report by Steve Doocy.

McCaul said he has not been able to confirm the report, saying DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

He said his "blueprint" calls for the deployment of new technology and aviation assets, including re-purposing equipment from the Afghanistan war after U.S. forces start to leave.

Watch McCaul's interview above and Hunter's appearance on "OTR" below.

Fake news. That has never been confirmed, DHS, CBP, ICE...none of them have ever confirmed it. JW source is a disgraced, indicted fraud that stole money given for wounded warriors to use for his own personal gain.

 

[iceberg]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

He has The Constitutional Rights to Declare a National Emergency and Appropriate Funds to Address it.

Congress is Criminally Negligent in addressing this threat to our Country.

Report: 4 ISIS Terrorists Caught at Southern Border in 36 Hrs

This morning, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, was asked about the latest Judicial Watch report by Steve Doocy.

McCaul said he has not been able to confirm the report, saying DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

He said his "blueprint" calls for the deployment of new technology and aviation assets, including re-purposing equipment from the Afghanistan war after U.S. forces start to leave.

Watch McCaul's interview above and Hunter's appearance on "OTR" below.

Fake news. That has never been confirmed, DHS, CBP, ICE...none of them have ever confirmed it. JW source is a disgraced, indicted fraud that stole money given for wounded warriors to use for his own personal gain.

the terminally angry people crack me up.

 

[Crepitus]

Let's just get rid of the Federal Government and leave border enforcement to the several states that border Mexico.


Problem solved.

Leave organizing a major project like that to Texas conservitards?

Now there's a recipe for disaster.

speaking of people only existing to cause disruption...

Oh I don't think they will do it deliberately, I just think they are not up to the job under the best of circumstances.

 

[OldLady]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

He has The Constitutional Rights to Declare a National Emergency and Appropriate Funds to Address it.

Congress is Criminally Negligent in addressing this threat to our Country.

Report: 4 ISIS Terrorists Caught at Southern Border in 36 Hrs

This morning, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, was asked about the latest Judicial Watch report by Steve Doocy.

McCaul said he has not been able to confirm the report, saying DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

He said his "blueprint" calls for the deployment of new technology and aviation assets, including re-purposing equipment from the Afghanistan war after U.S. forces start to leave.

Watch McCaul's interview above and Hunter's appearance on "OTR" below.

Your article says that your headline is not accurate. But people should still worry, based on unfounded reports, anyway. That's Fox for ya.

DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

Look, I'm not denying that terrorists sneak across our border, but can you think of a single one (after 9/11) who has successfully carried out an attack that came into this country by sneaking over the border? I can't.

 

[iceberg]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

He has The Constitutional Rights to Declare a National Emergency and Appropriate Funds to Address it.

Congress is Criminally Negligent in addressing this threat to our Country.

Report: 4 ISIS Terrorists Caught at Southern Border in 36 Hrs

This morning, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, was asked about the latest Judicial Watch report by Steve Doocy.

McCaul said he has not been able to confirm the report, saying DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

He said his "blueprint" calls for the deployment of new technology and aviation assets, including re-purposing equipment from the Afghanistan war after U.S. forces start to leave.

Watch McCaul's interview above and Hunter's appearance on "OTR" below.

Your article says that your headline is not accurate. But people should still worry, based on unfounded reports, anyway. That's Fox for ya.

DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

Look, I'm not denying that terrorists sneak across our border, but can you think of a single one (after 9/11) who has successfully carried out an attack that came into this country by sneaking over the border? I can't.

our media in general fear mongers. it's not specific to one side. it just doesn't have the same effect on us when our side is doing it.

 

[Crepitus]

Shutdown Day 17: White House, Dems disagree on definition of ‘negotiating’

seems to me that they couldn't negotiate so that's why it was shut down. why is reopening it going to change anything?

in any event, what i don't understand is back in 2006 hillary, obama and many on the left said yes, walls are needed. they just didn't want a LONG wall that stretched out in areas where it doesn't make sense. use drones and technology to also supplement this.

so why not go back to what they wanted in 2006 and say "we'll compromise and do this" - around 700-1000 miles of walls *and* technology THEN we follow up by working on DACA and why immigration got to be such a hassle next.

instead we've put ourselves in a collective position where we simply refuse anything but what we want, even if we don't want it but only NOW want it cause *THEY* DON'T want it. whatever it is.

our government's collective mental age is around 8.

Did president Bush usurp congress' s constitutional power by shutting down the gov't in 2006?

That's the part that bothers me. I don't think a President should go around Congress, just to get funding for a project he wants. We have three equal branches of government and a system of checks and balances for a very good reason. This is a test of that system,I think.

if trump tries to go around the system i would be furious. not a fan of the wall to begin with but i'm less of a fan of *any* president finding short cuts to put their will over the system/process.

He has The Constitutional Rights to Declare a National Emergency and Appropriate Funds to Address it.

Congress is Criminally Negligent in addressing this threat to our Country.

Report: 4 ISIS Terrorists Caught at Southern Border in 36 Hrs

This morning, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, was asked about the latest Judicial Watch report by Steve Doocy.

McCaul said he has not been able to confirm the report, saying DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

He said his "blueprint" calls for the deployment of new technology and aviation assets, including re-purposing equipment from the Afghanistan war after U.S. forces start to leave.

Watch McCaul's interview above and Hunter's appearance on "OTR" below.

Your article says that your headline is not accurate. But people should still worry, based on unfounded reports, anyway. That's Fox for ya.

DHS officials he has spoken to claim it is not accurate.

But McCaul said the concerns about ISIS members trying to sneak over the Mexican border demonstrate the need for the federal government to finally implement a tough border security plan.

Look, I'm not denying that terrorists sneak across our border, but can you think of a single one (after 9/11) who has successfully carried out an attack that came into this country by sneaking over the border? I can't.

Terrorists get visas.