- Thread starter
- #141
Not with a law suit it doesn't. And by the way, where is the proof in the IG report? They are accusations. There is no proof.Because the IG report is bogus. McCabe is suing the IG to get at the particulars of the lack of evidence.Devin nunes republicans?I still haven't heard any McCabe supporters give me a plausible reason why he asked for immunity before testifying under oath before Congressional investigators. Anyone want to explain why the #2 guy at the FBI needs immunity from prosecution before he'll speak under oath? Anyone...anyone?
A guy who ran up the back stairs of the WH to give don the latest on his committee?
I'd be terrified too.
As a poster said, zero in his book has been proven inaccurate
I ask again...did you want to explain why Andrew McCabe asked for immunity from prosecution before he would testify under oath? Did you want to explain why the Inspector General declared that McCabe had lied at least three times under oath?
Yet you still show ZERO evidence of your claims. The IG report stands. McCabe is a proven liar, and you lose yet again. By the way moron, you have to prove "Russian interference", as only Clapper believed, not every agency. Try to keep up.
Russian interference was proven by way from the Trump Tower meeting.