Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that individual posting is truly mentally ill...and I am being serious...there is something that did not develop in their brain..and the brains of all liberal/ lefties.........they are what I call reality dyslexic and you can see it in their posts..they call us cowards for carrying a tool..........
Are you confused? I already told you those people have a rational expectation of the need for a gun.
Look you fucking RETARD, they want to BAN all semi automatic weapons, what else do you call that?No one wants to "get rid" of your guns; no one can force you to "get rid" of your guns.
So trying to ban ALL semi automatic weapons is not trying to ban firearms? What are you stupid?Only fearful people want to ban gunsYes…they want to get rid of our guns and only lack the ability to do it…..it they had the power those guns would be gone in a flash….
CPRC at National Review: "A Semi-Automatic Handgun Ban Wouldn’t Stop Mass Shooters" - Crime Prevention Research Center
From Georgia to California, Democratic legislators have introduced bills to ban all semi-automatic rifles or even all semi-automatics, period. In the New York Times this month, Thomas Friedman called for “bans on the manufacture and sale of all semi-automatic and other military-style guns.” The city council of Lexington, Mass., is seeking to “ban the ownership of semi-automatic or fully automatic weapons able to hold ammunition clips containing more than ten rounds.”
Well over half of the guns sold in the U.S. are semi-automatic. And, if a gun can accept a magazine, that magazine can be of pretty much any size. So the “ten round” rule is meaningless. So, with the exception of a few specialty guns, these rules would in effect ban all semi-automatic guns.
This Democrat goal is nothing new, of course — in 1998, Illinois state senator Barack Obama supported a “ban on the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons” — but for years, gun-control advocates wanted to ban guns based on appearances. Now, instead of arbitrarily going after guns because of how they look, Democrats are at least being logically consistent and talking about banning guns based on how they function.
But no…they really don't want to ban our guns…….right?
Only a coward thinks he needs to be armed to face the world, You should seek counseling for your debilitating fear.
Only people in your imagination want to ban guns. Can you name one legitimate effort to take your guns?
Go ahead provide for us a list and a link to all the innocent bystanders accidentally killed by legal firearms owners I remind you ACCIDENTALLY.Only a coward think's he needs a fire extinguisher when making Banana's Foster.....
were you attacked by a banana?
It's not the banana, its the fire. by your logic people who take the precaution of having a fire extinguisher with them when they flambe' something are "cowards"
I've said many times. I don't have a problem if you want to strap a fire extinguisher to your leg and prance around town.
Yet you have an issue with your fellow citizens wanting to defend themselves with a simple handgun.....
Who's afraid of what or who?
No reason to believe someone carrying a gun knows how to use it or has the reasoning ability to know when to use it. Not many innocent bystanders killed by someone misusing a fire extinguisher.
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Not fear. Most shootings are done with handguns, which have no purpose except to kill people. However, if a nutcase wants to go shoot up a Starbucks or a movie theater, let him or her do it one slow bullet at a time. Less damage that way. I have no idea what O'Malley is doing in the race, but I like what he said, "No self-respecting hunter I've ever met needs an AR-15 to take down a deer."The fact is folks that rifles of any kind are used in very few murders
More people are killed by fists and feet than by any type of rifle so this call to restrict or ban any semiautomatic is nothing but knee jerk reactionary fear
You don't even know what an AR 15 is
Here let me educate you
This AR15
Is functionally no different than this rifle
And people use the latter for hunting all the time
Are they both semi-automatics? Great! Ban them both. One bullet at a time, nice and slow, to take down your animal. Those magazines with super #'s of bullets aren't necessary, either. Thanks for the pictures, though.
Only a coward thinks he needs to be armed to face the world, You should seek counseling for your debilitating fear.
Gun-Toting Grandma Stops Would-Be Assailant
An elderly woman is a coward because she wants a gun for self defense? Really?
So that incident proves everybody should be armed all the time? That's nuts.
His job requires it because he has a realistic expectation of needing it.
Everyone has a realistic expectation of needing to defend one's self or someone else.
Or can you guarantee that some random grandmother may never need to defend herself with a firearm?
Just because I can't guarantee that something won't ever happen doesn't mean it's reasonable to expect it every day.
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
It is not a loophole….private individuals selling private property do not have to do a background check. If I am a private seller I can sell my gun at my home, at your home or at a gun show unless their rules don't allow it…..there is no loophole, it is called freedom to sell my own property. Any licensed gun dealer at a gun show has to do a federal background check….what is it about that fact that you twits don't get.
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
The only reason you anti gun twits want background checks is to get gun registration, and then confiscation. We have shown countless times that background checks do nothing at all to stop criminals or mass shooters from getting guns.
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
The only reason you anti gun twits want background checks is to get gun registration, and then confiscation. We have shown countless times that background checks do nothing at all to stop criminals or mass shooters from getting guns.
No. You have said it countless times. You haven't shown shit.
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
The only reason you anti gun twits want background checks is to get gun registration, and then confiscation. We have shown countless times that background checks do nothing at all to stop criminals or mass shooters from getting guns.
No. You have said it countless times. You haven't shown shit.
Yes we have……we have shown that current federally mandated background checks and any future, Universal Background checks are easily bypassed by criminals…they either steal the gun, by it from those who have already gotten it illegally, or send in a straw buyer to get the gun…making the background check meaningless…..
Mass shooters….they all passed background checks except for one or two who bought their guns illegally (columbine) or stole the guns (Sandy Hook)…..again, making background checks meaningless……
the only one who faces a problem…the normal, law abiding gun owner, who may fill out the paperwork wrong, or have a name similar to someone who can't pass a background check…
There…I showed you again…..
Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
The only reason you anti gun twits want background checks is to get gun registration, and then confiscation. We have shown countless times that background checks do nothing at all to stop criminals or mass shooters from getting guns.
No. You have said it countless times. You haven't shown shit.
Yes we have……we have shown that current federally mandated background checks and any future, Universal Background checks are easily bypassed by criminals…they either steal the gun, by it from those who have already gotten it illegally, or send in a straw buyer to get the gun…making the background check meaningless…..
Mass shooters….they all passed background checks except for one or two who bought their guns illegally (columbine) or stole the guns (Sandy Hook)…..again, making background checks meaningless……
the only one who faces a problem…the normal, law abiding gun owner, who may fill out the paperwork wrong, or have a name similar to someone who can't pass a background check…
There…I showed you again…..
I'm sure every gun nut here is right with you. The majority of NRA members, Republicans, Democrats, the entire country disagrees with you.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
The only reason you anti gun twits want background checks is to get gun registration, and then confiscation. We have shown countless times that background checks do nothing at all to stop criminals or mass shooters from getting guns.
No. You have said it countless times. You haven't shown shit.
Yes we have……we have shown that current federally mandated background checks and any future, Universal Background checks are easily bypassed by criminals…they either steal the gun, by it from those who have already gotten it illegally, or send in a straw buyer to get the gun…making the background check meaningless…..
Mass shooters….they all passed background checks except for one or two who bought their guns illegally (columbine) or stole the guns (Sandy Hook)…..again, making background checks meaningless……
the only one who faces a problem…the normal, law abiding gun owner, who may fill out the paperwork wrong, or have a name similar to someone who can't pass a background check…
There…I showed you again…..
I'm sure every gun nut here is right with you. The majority of NRA members, Republicans, Democrats, the entire country disagrees with you.
Wrong….those who say they agree with background checks don't have the slightest clue what the real issue is because the anti gun twits doing the poll aren't telling them the truth. They lie in the poll to get that result, because if they told the truth no one would agree with the poll…..
Nothing here changes the fact that -you- lied.Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
He knows this, just as he knows he's lying about it.Because you lie about current gun laws in order to convince others that stronger laws are needed.Not sure why you think I'm a gun grabber.
Proof of your lie? See the links in my sig.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe fox when they say there is no gun show loophole doesn't mean the loophole doesn't exist.
Gun Show Background Checks State Laws
It is not a loophole
