Not a single Trumper here has read a word of the Mueller report.

[Timmy]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

 

[Thinker101]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

Imagine that, not a single Democrat in congress has read the unredacted version of the Muller report....guess they're way too busy whining.

 

[Rocko]

I have better shit to do with my time. All I need to know is they’ll be no further indictments

 

[Timmy]

I have better shit to do with my time. All I need to know is they’ll be no further indictments

Enjoy your ignorance. Typical trumpet .

 

[Timmy]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

 

[FA_Q2]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

I assume you have a point when re-posting this paragraph that everyone actually has read...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

Read every word, stupid fuck.

I kick the shit out of you Stalinists with it every time I'm on the board.

Hey timmy, you're stupid, and you're a liar, but otherwise you're a complete pile of shit.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime

Meaning there is no crime.

it also does not exonerate him.

In the absence of a crime there can be no exoneration. Do we need to tattoo this in reverse on your forehead to remind you each morning?

 

[Oddball]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

You don't prove negatives, halfwit...Either the Mule had evidence of obstruction or he didn't.

According to his report he didn't have such evidence.

Case closed....You lose, loser.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

Did Obama or Nancy read Obama care before they signed it ????



Lol


You liberals are so easy to make fun of on here


.

 

[Timmy]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

I assume you have a point when re-posting this paragraph that everyone actually has read...

Not everyone . Roko said so himself .

 

[Uncensored2008]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime

Meaning there is no crime.

it also does not exonerate him.

In the absence of a crime there can be no exoneration. Do we need to tattoo this in reverse on your forehead to remind you each morning?

It's a lot more than that.

{I begin with the SCO's stated conclusion on the obstruction question: The SCO
concluded that the evidence prevent[ed] [it] from conclusively determining that no criminal
conduct occurred." 300 Report v.2. p2. But conclusively determining that no criminal
conduct occurred was not the SCO's assigned task. because making conclusive determinations
of innocence is never the task of the federal prosecutor.

What prosecutors are supposed to do is complete an investigation and then either ask the
grand jury to return an indictment or decline to charge the case. When prosecutors decline to
charge. they make that decision not because they have conclusively determin[ed] that no
criminal conduct occurred, but rather because they do not believe that the investigated conduct
constitutes a crime for which all the elements can be proven to the satisfaction of a jury beyond a
reasonable doubt. Prosecutors simply are not in the business of establishing innocence. any more
than they are in the business of "exonerating" investigated persons. In the American justice
system, innocence is presumed; there is never any need for prosecutors to conclusively
determine it. Nor is there any place for such a determination. Our country would be a very
different (and very dangerous) place if prosecutors applied the SCO standard and citizens were
obliged to prove ?conclusively . . . that no criminal conduct occurred.}

Read the letter White House counsel Emmet Flood wrote to AG Barr

 

[Timmy]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

Did Obama or Nancy read Obama care before they signed it ????



Lol


You liberals are so easy to make fun of on here


.

Did you read the the ACA before bitching about it?

We are talking about a report vs a complicated dry statute . Really, have you ever read one of these big laws ?

 

[Pilot1]

The Russia narrative was proven to be a hoax just as man made climate change is a HOAX. Nice try. Hillary LOST. Get over it.

 

[Timmy]

The Russia narrative was proven to be a hoax just as man made climate change is a HOAX. Nice try. Hillary LOST. Get over it.

It was not a hoax !

To paraphrase the opening of the report : “Russia totally fucked with our election !”

 

[rightwinger]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

Dont confuse them with facts

They got Barr

 

[rightwinger]

The Russia narrative was proven to be a hoax just as man made climate change is a HOAX. Nice try. Hillary LOST. Get over it.

Kool Aid is strong with this one

 

[caddo kid]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

I have to agree with you 1,000%.

From all the comments I get here @ USMB from Trumpers concerning the Mueller report it's pretty obvious none of them have bothered to read a damn single sentence of it.

Here is my favorite quote from the Mueller report:
“The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President’s corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

When I post that here @ USMB, not a single Trumper has any idea WTF that means.
These people FAILED fourth grade civics class.
No wonder Trump's base are (collectively & individually) dumber than a fucking shit sandwich.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

Guess what? Hillary's still not President

 

[MarathonMike]

Why I would I waste one minute of my life reading a report about an illegally spawned investigation of a non-crime?