Not the Gateway Pundit II

[pknopp]

It does not matter. It is about believing in the system.

People didn't believe we landed on the moon. Should I care?

 

[Lastamender]

People didn't believe we landed on the moon. Should I care?

You do not seem to care about the country. No one expects anything from you, so relax.

 

[okfine]

More trolling. It makes the GA. crooks look worse.

 

[Mac1958]

A lawsuit has been filed. Good. Let's see what happens.

If the suit is successful, anyone who broke the law must be prosecuted and any holes in the system must be fixed.

As always. This ain't that complicated.

 

[miketx]

Neither do Republican appointed judges and state's attorneys it seems

Commie rinos all. Get rid of them.

 

[Lastamender]

A lawsuit has been filed. Good. Let's see what happens.

If the suit is successful, anyone who broke the law must be prosecuted and any holes in the system must be fixed.

As always. This ain't that complicated.

But as always it is rigged and no one is ever held accountable.

 

[miketx]

Neither of:
You
Lastamender
D'Snooza
Rudy and the Kraken team........... have EVER presented any proof.

We have lots of theories, but we don't have the Proof.

Calling YOU out at your LIES is not trolling.

1) Cell Phone pings don't count as votes.
2) Early mail in ballot voting is NOT fraud.

You just make stuff up.

Did Rudy, in front of the Judge, have the opportunity to present his so-called evidence? Yes he did, he withdrew.

His family was threatened.

 

[Winco]

You are right and they use maneuvers like dismissing cases so no evidence can ever be presented.

Quit LYING.
Rudy had the opportunity to present evidence.

Facing Discipline, Rudy Giuliani Needs to Show DC Bar He Had Evidence of Election Fraud | National Law Journal

A D.C. Bar lawyer cautioned Giuliani's lawyers it did not appear they were focusing on the crux of the complaint filed against their client.

www.law.com

The underlying lawsuit that led to the ethics complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Pennsylvania, falsely claimed more than a million counted mail-in ballots should be disqualified for not complying with Pennsylvania’s election laws. It was dismissed by a federal judge in 2020. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the dismissal, with Trump-appointed Judge Stephanos Bibas writing, “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”


Giuliani’s attorney, Barry Kamins, said on Thursday that he and his co-counsel, John Leventhal, plan to show that their client was late to the litigation in Pennsylvania and relied on information from other attorneys, making it reasonable for him to believe the allegations were true.

 

[Winco]

His family was threatened.

What are you babbling about now?

 

[Winco]

Third Circuit Rejects Trump's Appeal in Broad Challenge to Pa. Election | The Legal Intelligencer

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

www.law.com

The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday rejected a bid by President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign to invalidate Pennsylvania’s election results.

Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas said there was no evidence to support the campaign’s argument that, based on alleged restrictions on its poll watchers, and measures taken to allow voters to cure defective ballots, the election was tilted against it.


Bibas is a Trump appointee. The decision is non-precedential.

 

[Lastamender]

Quit LYING.
Rudy had the opportunity to present evidence.

Facing Discipline, Rudy Giuliani Needs to Show DC Bar He Had Evidence of Election Fraud | National Law Journal

A D.C. Bar lawyer cautioned Giuliani's lawyers it did not appear they were focusing on the crux of the complaint filed against their client.

www.law.com

The underlying lawsuit that led to the ethics complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Pennsylvania, falsely claimed more than a million counted mail-in ballots should be disqualified for not complying with Pennsylvania’s election laws. It was dismissed by a federal judge in 2020. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the dismissal, with Trump-appointed Judge Stephanos Bibas writing, “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”


Giuliani’s attorney, Barry Kamins, said on Thursday that he and his co-counsel, John Leventhal, plan to show that their client was late to the litigation in Pennsylvania and relied on information from other attorneys, making it reasonable for him to believe the allegations were true.

That was not an evidentuary hearing. That was a hearing about disbarring him. Come back when you know the difference.

 

[Lastamender]

Calling YOU out at your LIES is not trolling.

1) Cell Phone pings don't count as votes.
2) Early mail in ballot voting is NOT fraud.

You just make stuff up.

Did Rudy, in front of the Judge, have the opportunity to present his so-called evidence? Yes he did, he withdrew.

Go away troll. I have reported you.

 

[Lastamender]

Third Circuit Rejects Trump's Appeal in Broad Challenge to Pa. Election | The Legal Intelligencer

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

www.law.com

The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday rejected a bid by President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign to invalidate Pennsylvania’s election results.

Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas said there was no evidence to support the campaign’s argument that, based on alleged restrictions on its poll watchers, and measures taken to allow voters to cure defective ballots, the election was tilted against it.


Bibas is a Trump appointee. The decision is non-precedential.

Still not an evidentiary hearing.

 

[miketx]

Can you give me 3-4 Weeks?
Explosive Weeks.

That's a long time to have explosive diarrhea!

 

[miketx]

What are you babbling about now?

Can't read?

 

[toobfreak]

Fake News.

^^^ FAKE PERSON

 

[Winco]

^^^ FAKE PERSON

Great comeback.

 

[toobfreak]

Great comeback.

Wish I could say the same.

 

[Winco]

Wish I could say the same.

You're trying, but you keep Failing.

Can you post that evidence of Fraud....... Please.
I'd like to see what you claim as proof.

If there's proof, then post it.
It's NOT that hard to copy and paste your proof.
Why haven't you?

 

[toobfreak]

Why haven't you?

You're hip deep in the proof here every single day. Too bad it is like casting pearls before swine.

Sooy! Sooy! Oink Oink