Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

[P@triot]

CON$ervoFascism has failed every time it's tried.

Considering that this thread is filled with links to news reports about cities, states, and nations collapsing under idiotic left-wing hatriot economic policy and considering that you're too stupid to even understand that fascism is exclusively a left-wing ideology, your post is meaningless and falls on deaf ears as everyone ignores you due to your complete and total lack of credibility.

But....I get it. You're lonely and looking for interaction from people. It's kind of like "shock jocks" who say and do stupid things. In both cases, it's all about attention. They do it for ratings, you do it because you live a lonely and sad life.

 

[danielpalos]

2008 was the culmination of you economic policies.

Ignoring the atrocious grammar for the moment here - the problem with the 2008 economy was the housing collapse. And what caused that? Oh yeah - Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act which forced banks to make loans to people who couldn't afford them.

That's what happens with idiot left-wing economic policy. Failure. Poverty. Collapse.

that administration had the lowest unemployment rate in thirty years, back then.

 

[danielpalos]

Labor should be able to quit or cease work on an at-will basis, and collect unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. Period.

And for the sixth time in this thread, danielpalos moves the goalposts after being proved a liar. Your opinion about how labor laws should work does not change the fact that you made the outrageous lie that the poor were not protected under the law like the wealthy.

Now - as far as your opinion of how you think it should work - that is laughable and idiotic. People would quit their jobs 24x7. Unemployment is an insurance to protect people against something beyond your control. Quitting is within your control. You statement is as stupid and as asinine as saying that insurance people should pay out life insurance claims for people who commit suicide.

Nobody should receive funds for something they do intentionally to themselves.

it is the letter of the law; and, you have Only an inferior argument that will not work in Any superior Court.

 

[danielpalos]

CON$ervoFascism has failed every time it's tried.

Considering that this thread is filled with links to news reports about cities, states, and nations collapsing under idiotic left-wing hatriot economic policy and considering that you're too stupid to even understand that fascism is exclusively a left-wing ideology, your post is meaningless and falls on deaf ears as everyone ignores you due to your complete and total lack of credibility.

But....I get it. You're lonely and looking for interaction from people. It's kind of like "shock jocks" who say and do stupid things. In both cases, it's all about attention. They do it for ratings, you do it because you live a lonely and sad life.

you have nothing but propaganda and rhetoric; and most of that is just plain fallacy.

 

[P@triot]

2008 was the culmination of you economic policies.

Ignoring the atrocious grammar for the moment here - the problem with the 2008 economy was the housing collapse. And what caused that? Oh yeah - Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act which forced banks to make loans to people who couldn't afford them.

That's what happens with idiot left-wing economic policy. Failure. Poverty. Collapse.

that administration had the lowest unemployment rate in thirty years, back then.

Yeah....riding the wings of the Ronald Reagan policies which created an economic tidal wave. Then Clinton started to implement failed left-wing economic policy and everything started to collapse after those policies started taking affect.

 

[P@triot]

it is the letter of the law

I really hate to break this to you but your opinion does not a "letter of the law" make... And both the wealthy and the poor are held accountable to those exact same labor laws despite your outrageous lie otherwise.

 

[P@triot]

you have nothing but propaganda and rhetoric; and most of that is just plain fallacy.

Snowflake - I have nothing but news stories about real events and facts. I realize that you are desperate to mooch off of society, but your lies are failing because your ideology is failing and people can see that.

 

[danielpalos]

2008 was the culmination of you economic policies.

Ignoring the atrocious grammar for the moment here - the problem with the 2008 economy was the housing collapse. And what caused that? Oh yeah - Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act which forced banks to make loans to people who couldn't afford them.

That's what happens with idiot left-wing economic policy. Failure. Poverty. Collapse.

that administration had the lowest unemployment rate in thirty years, back then.

Yeah....riding the wings of the Ronald Reagan policies which created an economic tidal wave. Then Clinton started to implement failed left-wing economic policy and everything started to collapse after those policies started taking affect.

We had a dot com boom, not an Arms Race. That was the difference. Guess which guys were investing in Arms, or getting bailed out for failed financial plans while claiming to be Capitalists.

 

[danielpalos]

it is the letter of the law

I really hate to break this to you but your opinion does not a "letter of the law" make... And both the wealthy and the poor are held accountable to those exact same labor laws despite your outrageous lie otherwise.

You have nothing but an appeal to ignorance of the law; and your propaganda and rhetoric is nothing but diversion and repeal, instead of any form of better solution at lower cost, or valid argument. how typical of the right wing; is their colonel missing?

 

[P@triot]

Guess which guys were investing in Arms, or getting bailed out for failed financial plans

That would be left-wing hatriots. It was your side of the aisle that collapsed the economy and then it was your side of the aisle that insisted on bailing out companies (so much for the official party line denouncing "corporate welfare", eh?).

 

[P@triot]

...and your propaganda and rhetoric is nothing but diversion and repeal, instead of any form of better solution at lower cost, or valid argument.

We have a "solution". It's called the U.S. Constitution and it requires the federal government to stay the hell out of your unemployment problems. And if we enforce the U.S. Constitution, all of these problems will take care of themselves at a much lower cost.

 

[danielpalos]

Guess which guys were investing in Arms, or getting bailed out for failed financial plans

That would be left-wing hatriots. It was your side of the aisle that collapsed the economy and then it was your side of the aisle that insisted on bailing out companies (so much for the official party line denouncing "corporate welfare", eh?).

nothing but cognitive dissonance? Reagan invented, "trickle down".

 

[danielpalos]

...and your propaganda and rhetoric is nothing but diversion and repeal, instead of any form of better solution at lower cost, or valid argument.

We have a "solution". It's called the U.S. Constitution and it requires the federal government to stay the hell out of your unemployment problems. And if we enforce the U.S. Constitution, all of these problems will take care of themselves at a much lower cost.

all the right wing knows how to do, is "ditch capitalism" for their socialism on a national basis, while alleging to be for capitalism (as long as it involves lowering tax rates).

 

[P@triot]

Reagan invented, "trickle down".

Bwahahaha! Reagan "invented trickle down"? Really? Nobody thought of that before Ronald Reagan in 1980?

Snowflake - nobody "created" tickle down economics anymore than anyone created breathing. It's just a fact of life. Poor people do not create jobs - wealthy people do. Poor people do not drive industry - wealthy people do.

There are two options in the world and only two options: trickle down prosperity or flood up poverty. You idiots prefer flood up poverty because of your envy. You'd rather see everyone in poverty and misery with you then see someone have something you don't.

 

[P@triot]

all the right wing knows how to do, is "ditch capitalism" for their socialism on a national basis, while alleging to be for capitalism (as long as it involves lowering tax rates).

Right-wing "socialism"

That's literally as stupid as saying "legal rape" or "ethical unethical behavior".

 

[danielpalos]

Reagan invented, "trickle down".

Bwahahaha! Reagan "invented trickle down"? Really? Nobody thought of that before Ronald Reagan in 1980?

Snowflake - nobody "created" tickle down economics anymore than anyone created breathing. It's just a fact of life. Poor people do not create jobs - wealthy people do. Poor people do not drive industry - wealthy people do.

There are two options in the world and only two options: trickle down prosperity or flood up poverty. You idiots prefer flood up poverty because of your envy. You'd rather see everyone in poverty and misery with you then see someone have something you don't.

Reagan claimed it on national television, while being President of our Republic.

 

[P@triot]

Reagan claimed it on national television, while being President of our Republic.

And yet you have no link to support that outrageous claim nor do you embed the YouTube video of him saying such. Gee....I wonder why that is.

 

[danielpalos]

Reagan claimed it on national television, while being President of our Republic.

And yet you have no link to support that outrageous claim nor do you embed the YouTube video of him saying such. Gee....I wonder why that is.

i saw it on TV.

in any case, we can solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; only the right wing seems to have a problem with it.

 

[edthecynic]

No, they are well documented Right-wing lies about Liberals that you mindlessly parrot.

I didn't think you wanted any of that. Smart move, Ed.

You got nothing but lies.

I got your number, Ed. That is something. Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe.

Typical CON$ervoFascist drivel. ConservoFascism is a hate religion. Thank you for proving it.

So you believe morals are absolute, Ed?

I believe YOU do not get to decide what is moral. To CON$ervoFascists good IS evil, and "do gooders" are mocked! People who mock people who do good are morally bankrupt!!! CON$ervoFascisats are morally bankrupt.

 

[edthecynic]

Ignoring the atrocious grammar for the moment here - the problem with the 2008 economy was the housing collapse. And what caused that? Oh yeah - Bill Clinton's 1997 Community Re-Investment Act which forced banks to make loans to people who couldn't afford them.

A typical CON$ervoFascist lie. The CRA only made loans to QUALIFIED buyers. The CRA banned the banking practice of "RED LINING" only, which was used to prevent minorities from getting loans for homes in white neighborhoods. To the racist CON$ervoFascist Right, no minority is ever "qualified" for a loan in a white neighborhood.

Dumb ass - the CRA mandated that banks make loans to people they previously denied. And then it incentivized them to make those bad loans by promising to back them with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Without any risk to the banks, they were incentivized to make as many loans as possible. And that's what they did thanks to government interference in the free market. It caused the entire collapse of the housing market when people couldn't pay their mortgages and the banks were eventually forced to foreclose on the homes.

Typical CON$ervoFascist "half-truth whole lie." CRA mandated that banks make loans to people who were previously denied for RED LINING, not because of bad credit.

It was Bush's Dec 2003 American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI) that changed the rules to allow no downpayment loans for more than the house was worth to people with bad credit who could not keep up with the payments and who were at least 20% below the standard of living for the neighborhood they were buying into.

The ADDI was passed in Dec 2003 and everything in housing started to go bad in 2004. Even your MessiahRushie admits 2004 was the turning point for the Bush Housing Crash.

July 7,2010
BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: To illustrate my point even further: "Subprime mortgages accounted for 9 percent of all mortgage originations from 1996 through 2004." But that 9% became 21% from 2004 to 2006, 21% of all mortgages were subprime. Twenty-one percent of all mortgages were essentially money given away to people because they were loans made to people that everybody knew going in would never pay them back. And that 21% of the mortgage market being subprime equaled about $600,000 billion in 2006, which was at the time one-fifth of the US home loan market.