bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,164
- 47,312
- 2,180
Nope. Inless you are paying less than zero taxes, you aren't getting free shit.If you get a tax break that is paid for by charging EVERY taxpayer higher tax rates, that's accepting free shit, right?The fact that you are almost certainly enjoying an overpaid pension by some leftist government institution explains your views in complete detail.
Yep would be good to cut it, Middle aged and stopped working, who do you think pays for your free shit?
Trumplings should abandon their love for the phrase "free shit"
Cuz that's what the new Republican tax plan just gave the top 1% who will now get 86% of the spoils
No, free shit is giving something to someone that is not already theirs.
If a robber pulls a gun on you, takes all your money from your wallet, then before leaving gives you twenty for cab fair, only you would classify that as accepting free shit, Right?
I would prefer to vote for a D who campaigned on eliminating the cap entirely. But funneled the added revenue into the general fund to pay for greater numbers of people qualifying as disabled. That wouldn't help medicare. But the fact is we lack workers numbers. If people physically and mentally can work, imo they should.there's more than one way ..
Increase worker and employer contributions. Workers and their employers currently pay 6.2 percent of earnings up to $106,800 into the Social Security system, or a maximum of $6,622 each per year. Self-employed workers are required to pay 12.4 percent of pay up to the same cap. If the contribution rate were increased by 1.1 percent to 7.3 percent of earnings, Social Security’s projected deficit would be eliminated. Using this fix, a worker making $43,451 in 2010 would face a tax increase of $478 a year, or $9.19 a week, and the employer would face an identical increase.
but nooooooooooooooooooooo $9.19 a week cuts Starbucks out of my routine.
Unless they have private means to sit.
Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app