bendog
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 46,251
- 9,692
There will have to be a fundamental reshaping of how we live our lives. You are right that the tax schemes of 1932 will not work anymore. Medicare was never intended to provide the abundance of care seniors consume. Reagan has been proven correct on that one. It was thing to provide care to those who can't afford it, but quite another thing to create an entitlement program.Right.Just because one cannot find a job doesn't mean they are left to starve or go without HC. However, these two middle class entitlement programs are premised on tax schemes that are not sustainable. Without the W tax cuts we could have paid down privately/foreign help public debt to maybe borrow our way though the boomers ... but the millennials will be even .... Yuuuger.We are living longer, we should be working longer. Don't be so lazy. Your attitude is the exact entitlement mindset which is destroying our country.No matter what, I plan on working until I am 70. Maybe even 80. I would not be able to stand being idle.
That's nice.
so, because YOU'RE fine with working that long, you want to make it mandatory for everyone else?
"Gimme gimme gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it."
See post #94. You are overlooking a huge problem in current employment climate.
With medical advances, it is possible our children will live to be 150 years old.
Then my idea of retiring at 70 will seem incredibly short-sighted except for the fact I always append "and indexed to 9 percent of the population going forward."
People of the future are going to wonder who the genius G5000 was who was so far ahead of the curve.![]()
I got rear ended by some guy at least ten years younger than me yesterday. My car's old, and not much damage, and I don't much care. But the poor schmuck makes a living installing fire alarms, and I assume burglar alarms. He's fatter than me. I had jobs like that once. I'll very likely outlive him, and I'll probably out work him.