Sundance508
Gold Member
- May 24, 2016
- 3,109
- 609
- 255
Whether he's suspected of a crime has nothing to do with the use of force. It's all predicated on the suspect's actions in response to police commands. Why don't you leave it to cops to know what cops are supposed to do.Yes, you know police procedures better than cops themselves. You just get dumber with every post.Really? You think several law enforcement officers with guns drawn were NOT giving instructions? That's what they're taught at the academy, right? Draw guns and keep quiet and let the suspect figure out what he's supposed to do?
OMG Leftists are dumb!
Lawful instruction ! They had no right to treat him that way .
Why are they surrounding him and drawing guns ? They weren't called to the scene because there was some crime in process . The dudes car was broken down .
Oh yeah ? This is textbook police procedure ? Shoot an unarm man who's not even a suspect of a crime .
Sure it does . You can't use deadly force unless confronted with life threatening behavior .
You need to read the law on self defense....which is very similar in most states.....aka under the right to use deadly force to defend oneself 'one must have a reasonable belief that his life is being put in danger'....does a Negro refusing to obey a lawful police order and instead heads for his car and appears to be reaching for something construe a reasonable belief for the cop to believe her life is being put in danger?...I think most juries would agree she was very reasonable to believe her life was being put in danger.