Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
lanza wasnt the owner, his mother was. he had to kill her to take possesion of her arsenal.
How would a waiting period or smaller clips have prevented the other two from doing what they did?
You really think you can get a gun easier than a credit card or a car? Really? I'm talking legally, not in some back alley.
Yes, I think the other two are more closely monitored than gun ownership is.
This is a publicity stunt by the NRA. Don't be suckered into taking them seriously.
Yeah this is a standard play in their playbook and they did the same thing in Columbine. Anytime something heinous happens that's gun related, they do everything they can to throw gasoline on the fire and piss on everyone involved in the tragedy so that everyone gets so disgusted and frustrated that eventually everyone just gets mad and wanders off on to new things. Look how well it's worked just on the boards. Gun topics were all the rage the last few days and this morning, now with the NRA's bullshit presser already most people have moved on. It's kind of brilliant actually.
If you oppose having armed guards at schools, please explain why.
I cannot think of a reason why not. We have armed guards in congress, in banks, in courthouses, why not schools? unless the libtards think our children aren't worth it.
If you oppose having armed guards at schools, please explain why.
Because we shouldn't have to have them.
If you oppose having armed guards at schools, please explain why.
Because we shouldn't have to have them.
This is a publicity stunt by the NRA. Don't be suckered into taking them seriously.
Yeah this is a standard play in their playbook and they did the same thing in Columbine. Anytime something heinous happens that's gun related, they do everything they can to throw gasoline on the fire and piss on everyone involved in the tragedy so that everyone gets so disgusted and frustrated that eventually everyone just gets mad and wanders off on to new things. Look how well it's worked just on the boards. Gun topics were all the rage the last few days and this morning, now with the NRA's bullshit presser already most people have moved on. It's kind of brilliant actually.
You've got to be joking! Every time something like Sandy Hook happens, the left starts with their "Ban assault weapons and large capacity magazine" bullshit. The NRA responds to that.
I would bet that it takes an average of 5 minutes from a 911 call until Law Enforcement enters a school building in a typical school shooting incident. A reasonable competent person could kill 50 or 60 people with a single shot weapon in that length of time. Limiting weapons to 6 or 8 round magazines will do nothing to limit death tolls. It will only serve to convince Liberals that they are doing something to help.
The only logical way to limit an intruder's body count is to make him the first body.
IT'S ALL DA LIBERALZZZZZ FAULT.
If you oppose having armed guards at schools, please explain why.
Because we shouldn't have to have them.
There were armed guards in my middle and high school..... both private and the local PD.
Nichols, of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, described the NRAs proposal as preposterous.
I think its an absurd and dangerous idea, Nichols said. But as with so many of their proposals I think its real aim is to encourage the sale of more firearms. The biggest donors to the NRA are firearms manufacturers. Besides, arming and equipping all these people he wants to put in schools, having guns where kids see them daily is a tool to market weapons to the next generation.
Yeah this is a standard play in their playbook and they did the same thing in Columbine. Anytime something heinous happens that's gun related, they do everything they can to throw gasoline on the fire and piss on everyone involved in the tragedy so that everyone gets so disgusted and frustrated that eventually everyone just gets mad and wanders off on to new things. Look how well it's worked just on the boards. Gun topics were all the rage the last few days and this morning, now with the NRA's bullshit presser already most people have moved on. It's kind of brilliant actually.
You've got to be joking! Every time something like Sandy Hook happens, the left starts with their "Ban assault weapons and large capacity magazine" bullshit. The NRA responds to that.
I would bet that it takes an average of 5 minutes from a 911 call until Law Enforcement enters a school building in a typical school shooting incident. A reasonable competent person could kill 50 or 60 people with a single shot weapon in that length of time. Limiting weapons to 6 or 8 round magazines will do nothing to limit death tolls. It will only serve to convince Liberals that they are doing something to help.
The only logical way to limit an intruder's body count is to make him the first body.
Shut the fuck up idiot, seriously. The NRA dumped gasoline on the Columbine fire by having a huge rally there just a few days later in Littleton. After the Virginia Tech Massacres they tried to reduce restrictions on the mentally ill owning guns. They're dumbing gasoline on this fire by getting right wing retards all a titter by blaming everything but guns and making retarded statements like militarizing all the schools in America. This is what they do and they're good at it. Whenever a huge tragedy involving guns breaks out, the NRA tries to turn it into the biggest clusterfuck possible so that no one can do anything to improve or fix the situation. To dispute that is to dispute history.
And for it's worth, it doesn't really bother me. If people who scream about lobbyist groups, government corruption and unions unflinchingly support the NRA, that's their business.
You've got to be joking! Every time something like Sandy Hook happens, the left starts with their "Ban assault weapons and large capacity magazine" bullshit. The NRA responds to that.
I would bet that it takes an average of 5 minutes from a 911 call until Law Enforcement enters a school building in a typical school shooting incident. A reasonable competent person could kill 50 or 60 people with a single shot weapon in that length of time. Limiting weapons to 6 or 8 round magazines will do nothing to limit death tolls. It will only serve to convince Liberals that they are doing something to help.
The only logical way to limit an intruder's body count is to make him the first body.
Shut the fuck up idiot, seriously. The NRA dumped gasoline on the Columbine fire by having a huge rally there just a few days later in Littleton. After the Virginia Tech Massacres they tried to reduce restrictions on the mentally ill owning guns. They're dumbing gasoline on this fire by getting right wing retards all a titter by blaming everything but guns and making retarded statements like militarizing all the schools in America. This is what they do and they're good at it. Whenever a huge tragedy involving guns breaks out, the NRA tries to turn it into the biggest clusterfuck possible so that no one can do anything to improve or fix the situation. To dispute that is to dispute history.
And for it's worth, it doesn't really bother me. If people who scream about lobbyist groups, government corruption and unions unflinchingly support the NRA, that's their business.
The NRA hasn't been the lead in any case. They have simply responded to calls for more ineffective gun laws that criminals won't obey
Go ahead, give it a shot. Tell me how baning scary looking guns and 15 round magazines will prevent the next Sandy Hook.
omg...this board is wacked
More: Child Gun Deaths Nationwide Number Nearly 6 Newtown MassacresNichols, of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, described the NRA’s proposal as preposterous.
“I think it’s an absurd and dangerous idea,” Nichols said. “But as with so many of their proposals I think its real aim is to encourage the sale of more firearms. The biggest donors to the NRA are firearms manufacturers. Besides, arming and equipping all these people he wants to put in schools, having guns where kids see them daily is a tool to market weapons to the next generation.”
The NRA and firearms manufacturers want to addict kids to guns similar to the tobacco industry targeting kids.
Nancy Lanza was clearly a conservative wingnut.
If you oppose having armed guards at schools, please explain why.
I cannot think of a reason why not. We have armed guards in congress, in banks, in courthouses, why not schools? unless the libtards think our children aren't worth it.
the Nra suggested it is why, Liberals talk out of both ends of their ass
If you oppose having armed guards at schools, please explain why.
I cannot think of a reason why not. We have armed guards in congress, in banks, in courthouses, why not schools? unless the libtards think our children aren't worth it.
If you oppose having armed guards at schools, please explain why.
Because we shouldn't have to have them.
