Nuclear power is the greenest option, say top scientists

R

rdean

Guest
Nuclear power is the greenest option, say top scientists

A golf-ball-sized lump of uranium would supply the lifetime's energy needs of a typical person, equivalent to 56 tanker trucks of natural gas, 800 elephant-sized bags of coal or a renewable battery as tall as 16 "super" skyscraper buildings placed one on top of the other, they said.

China is using technology abandoned by the U.S. to build the nuclear plant of the future

Over the next two decades China hopes to build the world’s largest nuclear power industry. Plans include as many as 30 new conventional nuclear plants (in addition to the 34 reactors operating today) as well as a variety of next-generation reactors, including thorium molten-salt reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (which, like molten-salt reactors, are both highly efficient and inherently safe), and sodium-cooled fast reactors (which can consume spent fuel from conventional reactors to make electricity). Chinese planners want not only to dramatically expand the country’s domestic nuclear capacity but also to become the world’s leading supplier of nuclear reactors and components, a prospect that many Western observers find alarming.

-------------------------------------------------

We can't keep relying on "burning stuff". No matter how you look at it, it's dirty. Whether you are digging it out of the ground or drilling for it. And when you burn it, it creates pollution. There is no way around that.

I know it's a pipe dream. America needs educated people and Republicans know that educated people vote Democrat. But it's a nice dream.
 
And all the greenies want to use is windmills, solar panels and algae. They are skeerd of them Nuke Power Plants.
 
And all the greenies want to use is windmills, solar panels and algae. They are skeerd of them Nuke Power Plants.

yeah they tried that in Germany

since they have backed off the nuke power

in favor of windmills

they have been forced back into building coal fired plants

--LOL
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump doesn't cut through a lot of the regulation that is preventing the building of new nuclear energy plants. If he does, will Rdean say thank you?
 
yep , solar power , solyndra , wind , wave action but no to Nuke power .
 
And all the greenies want to use is windmills, solar panels and algae. They are skeerd of them Nuke Power Plants.

Well yeah, nuclear power is based on actual science, which democrats lack the capacity to understand.
 
Well, folks, THAT democrat is telling you nuclear power is sensible. And I agree, although the radioactive waste and the occasional disasters like Chernobyl and Fukushima are somewhat worrisome. But everything has a down side. You have to weigh which is worse.
 
And all the greenies want to use is windmills, solar panels and algae. They are skeerd of them Nuke Power Plants.

Well yeah, nuclear power is based on actual science, which democrats lack the capacity to understand.
It is a great way to reduce CO2 emissions and still produce enough energy to live in a 1st world society. That should make the man made climate change chicken littles happy if that was there true cause and not world wide wealth redistribution..
 
And all the greenies want to use is windmills, solar panels and algae. They are skeerd of them Nuke Power Plants.

Well yeah, nuclear power is based on actual science, which democrats lack the capacity to understand.
It is a great way to reduce CO2 emissions and still produce enough energy to live in a 1st world society. That should make the man made climate change chicken littles happy if that was there true cause and not world wide wealth redistribution..
Could we then forget offshore drilling and those pipelines?
 
And all the greenies want to use is windmills, solar panels and algae. They are skeerd of them Nuke Power Plants.

Well yeah, nuclear power is based on actual science, which democrats lack the capacity to understand.
It is a great way to reduce CO2 emissions and still produce enough energy to live in a 1st world society. That should make the man made climate change chicken littles happy if that was there true cause and not world wide wealth redistribution..
Could we then forget offshore drilling and those pipelines?
In about 20 years, once we get all the nuke energy plants going.
 
Takes that long, huh? Still sounds good.
Could clever people try to figure out a way to eliminate the nuclear waste? Not just bury it, I mean.
 
Nukes are great for maintaining centralized power. Just imagine if people could produce what they needed on their own! Why, they might get ideas of independence! Besides, there are no dangers other than terrorists, earthquakes, floods, strikes and others we haven't realized yet.
 
Nukes are great for maintaining centralized power. Just imagine if people could produce what they needed on their own! Why, they might get ideas of independence! Besides, there are no dangers other than terrorists, earthquakes, floods, strikes and others we haven't realized yet.
-------------------------------------------------------------- I guess that , everything has drawbacks
 
Nukes are great for maintaining centralized power. Just imagine if people could produce what they needed on their own! Why, they might get ideas of independence! Besides, there are no dangers other than terrorists, earthquakes, floods, strikes and others we haven't realized yet.

More people have died due to faults in:

  1. Nuclear Power Plants
  2. Hydroelectric Power Plants
Yeah, thus ends your point...
 

Forum List

Back
Top