Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know it's troubling when you've ticked off the most liberal news outlet in America. The New York Times has now come out swinging after after news broke that the NSA signed off on an order requiring Verizon Wireless to submit the phone records of over 120 million subscribers to government officials. The Obama Administration has now come out defending the move.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/o...dragnet.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&pagewanted=allWithin hours of the disclosure that the federal authorities routinely collect data on phone calls Americans make, regardless of whether they have any bearing on a counterterrorism investigation, the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights.
Those reassurances have never been persuasive — whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agency’s phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism — especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability. The administration has now lost all credibility. Mr. Obama is proving the truism that the executive will use any power it is given and very likely abuse it. That is one reason we have long argued that the Patriot Act, enacted in the heat of fear after the 9/11 attacks by members of Congress who mostly had not even read it, was reckless in its assignment of unnecessary and overbroad surveillance powers.
You know it's troubling when you've ticked off the most liberal news outlet in America. The New York Times has now come out swinging after after news broke that the NSA signed off on an order requiring Verizon Wireless to submit the phone records of over 120 million subscribers to government officials. The Obama Administration has now come out defending the move.
Within hours of the disclosure that the federal authorities routinely collect data on phone calls Americans make, regardless of whether they have any bearing on a counterterrorism investigation, the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights.
Those reassurances have never been persuasive whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agencys phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability. The administration has now lost all credibility. Mr. Obama is proving the truism that the executive will use any power it is given and very likely abuse it. That is one reason we have long argued that the Patriot Act, enacted in the heat of fear after the 9/11 attacks by members of Congress who mostly had not even read it, was reckless in its assignment of unnecessary and overbroad surveillance powers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/o...dragnet.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&pagewanted=all
You all were just as certain that Romney was going to win the election too. You've also brought scandal after scandal that simply hasn't worked out as you expected.
Calm down. Your bullshit has ticked off America. Nothing you say has any cred.
You know it's troubling when you've ticked off the most liberal news outlet in America. The New York Times has now come out swinging after after news broke that the NSA signed off on an order requiring Verizon Wireless to submit the phone records of over 120 million subscribers to government officials. The Obama Administration has now come out defending the move.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/o...dragnet.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&pagewanted=all
You all were just as certain that Romney was going to win the election too. You've also brought scandal after scandal that simply hasn't worked out as you expected.
Calm down. Your bullshit has ticked off America. Nothing you say has any cred.
Soooo, what does this have to do with my thread exactly?
Hey, the right wing lost the 2008 election and suddenly realized it was passing the totalitarian torch it had created to a Democrat.
A little late to be waking up, kids.
BS- Latest news is this whole thing is a renewal, every 3 months, of a policy in place for the last SEVEN YEARS. ANOTHER BS Pub "scandal"...
OP- RW spam for dupes only. Who wrote this, and how is it NOT the "NYT"?, lying RW swine and silly dupes...lol
You all were just as certain that Romney was going to win the election too. You've also brought scandal after scandal that simply hasn't worked out as you expected.
Calm down. Your bullshit has ticked off America. Nothing you say has any cred.
Soooo, what does this have to do with my thread exactly?
You've referenced the opinion pages of the NYT. The opinion pages are NOT the most Liberal news organization. You're a little confused alright. The Opinion pages can be pretty wingnutty.
Soooo, what does this have to do with my thread exactly?
You've referenced the opinion pages of the NYT. The opinion pages are NOT the most Liberal news organization. You're a little confused alright. The Opinion pages can be pretty wingnutty.
The editorial board of the NYT is not wingnutty, asswipe.
You've referenced the opinion pages of the NYT. The opinion pages are NOT the most Liberal news organization. You're a little confused alright. The Opinion pages can be pretty wingnutty.
The editorial board of the NYT is not wingnutty, asswipe.
What would you know about it, peabrain.
You've referenced the opinion pages of the NYT. The opinion pages are NOT the most Liberal news organization. You're a little confused alright. The Opinion pages can be pretty wingnutty.
The editorial board of the NYT is not wingnutty, asswipe.
What would you know about it, peabrain.