Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans have a hard time with sarcasm. Colbert seems to always go over their heads
Republicans have a hard time with sarcasm. Colbert seems to always go over their heads
Libtards value their own opinions to highly.
Republicans have a hard time with sarcasm. Colbert seems to always go over their heads
Only morons watch idiots like Colbert and his humor is so immature I can see how it's appealing to your ilk.
Republicans have a hard time with sarcasm. Colbert seems to always go over their heads
Only morons watch idiots like Colbert and his humor is so immature I can see how it's appealing to your ilk.
Yeah Mudwhistle, Templar and Vigilante
Republicans have a hard time with sarcasm. Colbert seems to always go over their heads
Libtards value their own opinions to highly.
to highly what?
Libtards value their own opinions to highly.
to highly what?
Huh?
Only morons watch idiots like Colbert and his humor is so immature I can see how it's appealing to your ilk.
Yeah Mudwhistle, Templar and Vigilante
Yet you are the one stating you understand Colbert...
to highly what?
Huh?
He has nothing, so he had to hammer on the "to" instead of "too".
It's a common deflection of the low informed.
Republicans have a hard time with sarcasm. Colbert seems to always go over their heads
California will face billions of dollars in spending to cope with the consequences of rising sea levels if low-lying communities along the coast are ultimately submerged, as scientists predict, Gov. Jerry Brown said Tuesday.
Browns remarks came a day after the release of two studies finding that a slow-motion and irreversible collapse of a massive cluster of glaciers in Antarctica has begun and could cause sea levels to rise worldwide by four feet within 200 years.
"If that happens, the Los Angeles airport's going to be underwater," Brown told reporters at a presentation of his revised state budget proposal in Los Angeles. "So is the San Francisco airport."
Also underwater, he added, would be the San Onofre nuclear power plant.
"Youre going to have to move all that," Brown said. "Thats billions, if not tens of billions. Luckily, we can take a few years." He joked: "Maybe my next years budget will handle that."
Class, let's see if we all understand this mystery of nature. Water moves uphill and defeats the law of gravity. Sea level to the LA Airport is about 125 feet, give or take high or low tide. Newton's law of gravity is no longer true. The democrats say it is so. Is that about it? I'm selling and...
As Brown reviewed highlights of his revised $156.2-billion spending proposal for the fiscal year starting July 1, he stressed plans to pay down state debt, expand healthcare coverage and shore up the teachers' retirement system to prevent it from running out of money. Brown says rising sea levels could force costly move of LAX*-*Los Angeles Times
to highly what?
Huh?
He has nothing, so he had to hammer on the "to" instead of "too".
It's a common deflection of the low informed.
Huh?
He has nothing, so he had to hammer on the "to" instead of "too".
It's a common deflection of the low informed.
Yeah well I didnt take the highly informed road like saying someone takes their opinion to high.
He has nothing, so he had to hammer on the "to" instead of "too".
It's a common deflection of the low informed.
Yeah well I didnt take the highly informed road like saying someone takes their opinion to high.
I did not say to high, I said to highly. Surely you understand the difference. Oh, nvm forgot you are a lib.
Yeah well I didnt take the highly informed road like saying someone takes their opinion to high.
I did not say to high, I said to highly. Surely you understand the difference. Oh, nvm forgot you are a lib.
Great, I didnt take the high road like saying someone takes their opinion "to" highly
I provided a link. Too lazy to click it? Oh wait of course you are, you told me to find the proof for YOUR claim.
I take it you wont be providing any source for your claim. Got it.
No, no you didn't provide a link. You made a claim about industrialized countries, NOT your money grubbing academia.
Yeah, where's this link? I didn't see one?
I did not say to high, I said to highly. Surely you understand the difference. Oh, nvm forgot you are a lib.
Great, I didnt take the high road like saying someone takes their opinion "to" highly
What is confusing you about the obvious fact that an idiot shouldn't take their own opinion to highly?
I did not say to high, I said to highly. Surely you understand the difference. Oh, nvm forgot you are a lib.
Great, I didnt take the high road like saying someone takes their opinion "to" highly
What is confusing you about the obvious fact that an idiot shouldn't take their own opinion to highly?
I did not say to high, I said to highly. Surely you understand the difference. Oh, nvm forgot you are a lib.
Great, I didnt take the high road like saying someone takes their opinion "to" highly
What is confusing you about the obvious fact that an idiot shouldn't take their own opinion to highly?
That would be because you are a witless wonder.Great, I didnt take the high road like saying someone takes their opinion "to" highly
What is confusing you about the obvious fact that an idiot shouldn't take their own opinion to highly?
Mud posted it...blame him. Templar and Vigilante thanked him and obviously didnt get the joke. Blame them. I gave no opinion so thats where the confusion starts
Me, I'm laughing that Colbert snuck past you guys again with wit
