OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
- 265
You missed the point of my question. If splitting a larger company into smaller companies will have no repercussions and no real affect, why make them jump through the hoop? If it will be as easy as you suggest to split without making any changes, what benefit will be available to the already small companies that won't be available to the bigger companies through the superficial splitting you are advocating?Let's approach this from a different perspective shall we?
If there would be no significant changes in larger companies (just split them, easy as pie right) what is the reasoning behind offering the subsidies to smaller companies only?
Offering added help for small business? Really? Small business is the backbone of this country. Small business hires more American people than large multinationals. Why shouldn't the people that do the most hiring receive the most benefits? My plan reduces payroll costs by 80%.
Who's splitting? Large companies are already split. Each division in any large company is a separate company.
For tax reasons. Microsoft (Redmond, Washington), Intuit (Mountain View, California), and Swift Transportation (Phoenix, Az) along with thousands more are all Nevada Corporations with offices in Nevada. All are there own entity, but under a corporate banner.