ladyliberal
Progressive Princess
- Aug 5, 2011
- 1,253
- 291
- 48
Your information is dated 2009, sweetiekins. Please hang up and dial again. This is 2012.More: FactCheck.org : The Obama Phone?Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?
A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.![]()
Actually, the blog post you mention is from 2011. It also seems to be entirely plagiarized. The same text (with very minor stylistic alterations) appears in another story dated one day earlier: Obama Gives Illegal Aliens Phones for Votes
Lakhota's reference to the Factcheck article is highly relevant in that it refers to the same program (Safelink) as does the original article. As the article notes, the program has offered free cell phones continuously since the Bush administration.
It should be noted that Factcheck's claim that the program is not supported by taxes is somewhat misleading. As Factcheck notes, the program is set up through the FCC and uses funds collected from the telecom companies. So, these might not technically be taxes, but they are funds the government collects from businesses.
Let's break down the original article's (IE, the one that the cowboy byte plagiarized):
- The government is indirectly involved in a program that provides free cell phones. Obama is in charge of the government.
- Illegal aliens might be able to fraudulently obtain these cell phones. No evidence is cited to indicate either that this would be possible or that any have done it. To me it seems too little reward for the risk (arrest and deportation, facilitated by tracking the fraudulent cell phone).
- If the illegal aliens get the free cell phones that will make them happy, and they will want to reward Obama.
- The illegal aliens will commit unrelated fraud in order to vote in an election, and they will vote for Obama to reward him for continuing this Bush-era program.
So the article isn't even claiming that the phones will facilitate voter fraud-- only that they will motivate it.
The article also uses incredibly poor sourcing. An anonymous source apparently tells the author that there is a publication that urges "illegals" to commit voter fraud. Given the claim that this is published (and translated into English), there is no reason for the author to rely on an anonymous source rather than reading the article herself.
So, to summarize: plagiarized, poorly-sourced, very weak logic, incorrect timeline.