easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
"In October 2016, senior staff in the Obama White House discussed what they should do if Hillary Clinton won the November election and Donald Trump refused to accept the result as legitimate. They had cause to be worried. At that time, Trump had openly speculated that the election might be “rigged.” During his final debate with Clinton on October 19, he said that his opponent “should never have been allowed to run” and declined to answer the question of whether he would concede. “I’ll keep you in suspense,” the Republican nominee said.
“It wasn’t a hypothetical,” Ben Rhodes, Obama’s senior aide and speechwriter, told Intelligencer. “Trump was already saying it on the campaign trail.”
The Obama White House plan, according to interviews with Rhodes and Jen Psaki, Obama’s communications director, called for congressional Republicans, former presidents, and former Cabinet-level officials including Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, to try and forestall a political crisis by validating the election result. In the event that Trump tried to dispute a Clinton victory, they would affirm the result as well as the conclusions reached by the U.S. intelligence community that Russian interference in the election sought to favor Trump, and not Clinton. Some Republicans were already aware of Russian interference from intelligence briefings given to leaders from both parties during the chaotic months before the election. “We wanted to handle the Russia information in a way that was as bipartisan as possible,” Rhodes said.
A July 2017 op-ed by Obama’s chief of staff, Denis McDonough, refers to Obama directing his staff to “prepare possible responses” to claims of Russian interference in the election."
Yeah, we now know those 'Intel Briefings' Congress received FROM CIA DIRECTOR BRENNAN was based on an INTEL COMMUNITY REPORT created from the RUSSIAN-AUTHORED DOSSIER delivered by FBI Employee Trump-Hating foreign Sly Steele and purchased by Hillary Clinton.
As proven / supported in previous thread posts, it has been proven that FBI Agent and Co-Conspirator Strzok worked with Brennan and NIA Director Clapper to author 1st an Intel Community Assessment (ICA) that was controlled - sent to selective members of the Intel Community to get their desired response. Once they did they then used the Dossier / ICA to write the Intel Community Report that Brennan briefed to Congress.
When asked about this Brennan initially lied about briefing Congress, claiming instead that he had never heard of the Dossier. (The United States CIA did not know about a Russian-authored anti-Trump British foreign spy - who was working for the FBI - regarding a candidate potentially betraying the US? To believe that is to believe the Director of the CIA was the most ignorant / incompetent CIA Director in US history.) Evidence, instead, exposed the fact that Brennan had briefed Congress himself on the Dossier / ICR, during which he recommended an investigation be opened with Co-Conspirator Mueller be named Special Prosecutor.
"New evidence has come to light leading me to believe, that John Brennan, the former CIA chief, should be closely examined to determine whether he perjured himself when speaking to Congress about his knowledge surrounding the now infamous Steele Dossier. At the very least, new reports raise some very serious questions about whether he was less than truthful when he was under oath.
According to an exclusive report in Real Clear Investigations, “several Capitol Hill sources say Brennan, a fiercely loyal Obama appointee, talked up the dossier to Democratic leaders, as well as the press, during the campaign. They say he also fed allegations about Trump-Russia contacts directly to the FBI, while pressuring the bureau to conduct an investigation of several Trump campaign figures starting in the summer of 2016.”
The problem? Brennan denied knowing anything about the dossier months later in front of Congress, and made those denials under oath and under the promise of the penalty of perjury should he be caught lying again."
*** Did John Brennan Perjure Himself Over Steele Dossier?
Obama Had a Secret Plan in Case Trump Rejected 2016 Election Results
“It wasn’t a hypothetical,” Ben Rhodes, Obama’s senior aide and speechwriter, told Intelligencer. “Trump was already saying it on the campaign trail.”
The Obama White House plan, according to interviews with Rhodes and Jen Psaki, Obama’s communications director, called for congressional Republicans, former presidents, and former Cabinet-level officials including Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, to try and forestall a political crisis by validating the election result. In the event that Trump tried to dispute a Clinton victory, they would affirm the result as well as the conclusions reached by the U.S. intelligence community that Russian interference in the election sought to favor Trump, and not Clinton. Some Republicans were already aware of Russian interference from intelligence briefings given to leaders from both parties during the chaotic months before the election. “We wanted to handle the Russia information in a way that was as bipartisan as possible,” Rhodes said.
A July 2017 op-ed by Obama’s chief of staff, Denis McDonough, refers to Obama directing his staff to “prepare possible responses” to claims of Russian interference in the election."
Yeah, we now know those 'Intel Briefings' Congress received FROM CIA DIRECTOR BRENNAN was based on an INTEL COMMUNITY REPORT created from the RUSSIAN-AUTHORED DOSSIER delivered by FBI Employee Trump-Hating foreign Sly Steele and purchased by Hillary Clinton.
As proven / supported in previous thread posts, it has been proven that FBI Agent and Co-Conspirator Strzok worked with Brennan and NIA Director Clapper to author 1st an Intel Community Assessment (ICA) that was controlled - sent to selective members of the Intel Community to get their desired response. Once they did they then used the Dossier / ICA to write the Intel Community Report that Brennan briefed to Congress.
When asked about this Brennan initially lied about briefing Congress, claiming instead that he had never heard of the Dossier. (The United States CIA did not know about a Russian-authored anti-Trump British foreign spy - who was working for the FBI - regarding a candidate potentially betraying the US? To believe that is to believe the Director of the CIA was the most ignorant / incompetent CIA Director in US history.) Evidence, instead, exposed the fact that Brennan had briefed Congress himself on the Dossier / ICR, during which he recommended an investigation be opened with Co-Conspirator Mueller be named Special Prosecutor.
"New evidence has come to light leading me to believe, that John Brennan, the former CIA chief, should be closely examined to determine whether he perjured himself when speaking to Congress about his knowledge surrounding the now infamous Steele Dossier. At the very least, new reports raise some very serious questions about whether he was less than truthful when he was under oath.
According to an exclusive report in Real Clear Investigations, “several Capitol Hill sources say Brennan, a fiercely loyal Obama appointee, talked up the dossier to Democratic leaders, as well as the press, during the campaign. They say he also fed allegations about Trump-Russia contacts directly to the FBI, while pressuring the bureau to conduct an investigation of several Trump campaign figures starting in the summer of 2016.”
The problem? Brennan denied knowing anything about the dossier months later in front of Congress, and made those denials under oath and under the promise of the penalty of perjury should he be caught lying again."
*** Did John Brennan Perjure Himself Over Steele Dossier?
Obama Had a Secret Plan in Case Trump Rejected 2016 Election Results
