EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
of course if it was nonsense you would not be so afraid to explain why. What does your fear teach youl?Or do you really believe the nonsense you wrote?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
of course if it was nonsense you would not be so afraid to explain why. What does your fear teach youl?Or do you really believe the nonsense you wrote?
Oh my God. You actually believe Ted Cruz's political persuasion is "freedom." .
Oh my God. You actually believe Ted Cruz's political persuasion is "freedom." .
if you disagree please say why or admit by your silence that you lack the IQ to defend what you say.
Oh my God. You actually believe Ted Cruz's political persuasion is "freedom." .
if you disagree please say why or admit by your silence that you lack the IQ to defend what you say.
Holy cow, I thought you were way off, Ed, but I looked it up and you were way on. This graph proves it.
![]()
Source: America.
Oh my God. You actually believe Ted Cruz's political persuasion is "freedom." .
if you disagree please say why or admit by your silence that you lack the IQ to defend what you say.
Holy cow, I thought you were way off, Ed, but I looked it up and you were way on. This graph proves it.
![]()
Source: America.
deaar, if you disagree please say why or admit by your silence or attempt to change the subject that you lack the IQ to defend what you say.
the subject of where "freedom" falls on the political spectrum does not rise above funny picture status.
THAT's a f...king INCREASE!!
isn't thinking fun?THAT's a f...king INCREASE!!
perhaps but the issue is, do we want bigger or smaller central govt. China just eliminated 40% of world poverty with smaller govt. What is the lesson there?
the subject of where "freedom" falls on the political spectrum does not rise above funny picture status.
dear, America was founded to be about freedom from liberal govt. If you think liberals want freedom from central govt please give us your best example or admit you lack the IQ to be here.
Welcome to your ABC's
the subject of where "freedom" falls on the political spectrum does not rise above funny picture status.
dear, America was founded to be about freedom from liberal govt. If you think liberals want freedom from central govt please give us your best example or admit you lack the IQ to be here.
Welcome to your ABC's
Political persuasions of other prominent elected officials
Scott Walker: "Happiness"
Steve King: "Purple"
Elizabeth Warren: "That 70s Show But The Early Seasons, Not Later When Eric Left And Everyone Still Hung Out At His House For Some Reason"
dumbto3 is actually so dumb he doesn't know that JS MIl was a conservative and libertarian!! He wrote "On Liberty"! He didn't mean on liberty from the Girls Scouts but rather on liberty from govt.
I have asked him 134 times if he is a communist.
Republican campaign strategists may lie, but the numbers don’t. Government spending, when adjusted for inflation, has increased during his administration (to date) by 1.4%. Under George W. Bush, the increases were 7.3% (first term) and 8.1% (second term). Bill Clinton, in his two terms, comes in at 3.2% and 3.9%. George H. W. Bush increased government spending by 5.4%, while Ronald Reagan added 8.7% and 4.9% in his two terms.
Not only does Obama turn out to be the most thrifty president in recent memory, but the evidence shows that Republican administrations consistently increased government spending significantly more than any Democratic administration. Go figure.
NOT ONE comment about what happened in the years 2001 through 2008 THAT HAVE NEVER HAPPENED before and most likely will never happen again!
ONCE again I've got to remind people of the history!
What in the hell is wrong with you biased totally ignorant people that have NO obviously historical perspective?
1) Do YOU agree a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?
Source: USATODAY.com - It s official 2001 recession only lasted eight months
2) Do YOU agree that the dot.com bust occurred and cost $5 trillion in losses?
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $5 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies. More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 - and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs.
Source: The dot-com bubble How to lose 5 trillion 8211 Anderson Cooper 360 - CNN.com Blogs
3) Hard to believe but people forget that 9/11 cost $2 trillion in lost businesses,market values assets.
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York.
Year 2001: September 11 Terrorist Attacks
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone.
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
Source: The Top 10 Financial Events of the Decade
4) $1 trillion in written off losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history.
The worst, Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. Andrew slammed into South Florida in 1992 as a Category 5. It caused 40 deaths and $30 billion in property damage. More than 250,000 people were left homeless and 82,000 businesses were destroyed or damaged.
Hurricane Katrina ALONE! Year 2005: Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
On August 25, 2005, Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of the U.S. as a strong Category 3 or low Category 4 storm. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.
The Top 10 Financial Events of the Decade
THESE events OCCURRED!
YET in SPITE of
a) 400,000 jobs due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita ,
b) 2,800,000 jobs in alone due to 9/11,
c) 300,000 jobs lost due to dot.com busts...
In spite of nearly $8 trillion in lost businesses, market values, destroyed property.. IN SPITE of that:
AFTER the tax cuts Federal Tax REVENUES Increased an average of 9.78% per year!!!
Government Revenue Details Federal State Local for 2008 - Charts
How in god's creation CAN YOU idiots forgot ALL the above had a direct financial hit to the Federal Government?
But you idiots don't take in account that OBAMA has had NO SHIT to contend with! NOTHING!
Every problem that Bush had come up, recession, dot.com, 9/11 hurricanes/ housing collapse HE FACED which NO other president ever faced AND
he solved the problem going into the 2008 with declining DEFICITS!
OBAMA??? this dumb shit with NO cataclysmic events i.e. NO dot.com, no 9/11, NO hurricanes SEASONS NOTHING like these events!
AND Obama has created the largest DEFICITS and DEBT ever!
FACTS not fiction! Deficits of Presidents Obama/Bush
Federal deficit falling to lowest in Obama presidency
Total deficits Obama will have left DEFICITS totaling $6,356,000,000,000 ($6.3 trillion)
Total Deficits BUSH $3.294 trillion! Obama will have increased DEFICITS by 207%!!!
FY 2017 - $458 billion
FY 2016 - $531 billion
FY 2015 - $564 billion
FY 2014 - $649 billion
FY 2013 - $680 billion.
FY 2012 - $1.087 trillion.
FY 2011 - $1.299 trillion.
FY 2010 - $1.546 ($1.293 trillion plus $253 billion from the Obama Stimulus Act that was attached to the FY 2009 budget).
President George W. Bush: Total = $3.294 trillion.
FY 2009 - $1.16 trillion. ($1.416 trillion minus $253 billion from Obama's Stimulus Act)
FY 2008 - $458 billion.
FY 2007 - $161 billion.
FY 2006 - $248 billion.
FY 2005 - $318 billion.
FY 2004 - $413 billion.
FY 2003 - $378 billion.
FY 2002 - $158 billion.
Wait that entire scred you blame stuff on Clintons recession,9/11 (which Dubya ignored warnings on), Katrina, and THEN CLAIM RECEIPTS INCREASED UNDER DUBYA'S TAX CUTS? SERIOUSLY? lol
Bush CEA Chair Mankiw: Claim That Broad-Based Income Tax Cuts Increase Revenue Is Not "Credible," Capital Income Tax Cuts Also Don't Pay For Themselves
Bush-Appointed Federal Reserve Chair Bernanke: "I Don't Think That As A General Rule Tax Cuts Pay For Themselves."
Bush Treasury Secretary Paulson: "As A General Rule, I Don't Believe That Tax Cuts Pay For Themselves."
Bush OMB Director Nussle: "Some Say That [The Tax Cut] Was A Total Loss. Some Say They Totally Pay For Themselves. It's Neither Extreme."
Bush CEA Chairman Lazear: "As A General Rule, We Do Not Think Tax Cuts Pay For Themselves."
Bush Economic Adviser Viard: "Federal Revenue Is Lower Today Than It Would Have Been Without The Tax Cuts."
Bush Treasury Official Carroll: "We Do Not Think Tax Cuts Pay For Themselves."
NICE TALKING POINTS NOT BASED IN REALITY THOUGH BUBBA
Obama INHERITED POLICIES from Dubya that CAUSED the deficits under him, by and large. Grove me ONE policy (or as many as you like) that created even $1 trillion of debt since Obama came into office he is responsible for? lol
BTW THE US ECONOMY DIPPED 9%+ THE LAST 3 MONTHS OF 2008...
![]()
![]()
Hey Dumberto...
FACTS!!!
AFTER the tax cuts Federal Tax REVENUES Increased an average of 9.78% per year!!!
Government Revenue Details Federal State Local for 2008 - Charts
FROM THE US Government!!!
Income difference % increase
taxes prior yr decrease
2000 $1,211
2001 $1,145 -$66 -5.47% 9/11 remember Wall street closed, no flights 3 days.. billions lost in property
2002 $1,006 -$139 -12.14% recovery
2003 $926 -$81 -8.04%
2004 $998 $73 7.87% tax cuts actually start here... and what was the increase in revenues???
2005 $1,206 $207 20.76% increase in revenues???
2006 $1,398 $192 15.95% increase in revenues???
2007 $1,534 $136 9.72% increase in revenues???
2008 $1,450 -$84 -5.45% economic collapse $500 billion pulled 9/18/08 in 2 hours..
Gross revenue from 2000 at $1.211 trillion
Gross Revenue 2007 $1.534 trillion!
THAT's a f...king INCREASE!!
Nutters are very find of pretending that liberals don't know the difference between the deficit and the debt. That's silly of course.
What isn't silly....is that nutters don't know the relationship between the two.
Obama will have added more to the deficit than all other Presidents combined. That is the only fact that matters.
Freedom from Government ?the subject of where "freedom" falls on the political spectrum does not rise above funny picture status.
dear, America was founded to be about freedom from liberal govt. If you think liberals want freedom from central govt please give us your best example or admit you lack the IQ to be here.
Welcome to your ABC's
Political persuasions of other prominent elected officials
Scott Walker: "Happiness"
Steve King: "Purple"
Elizabeth Warren: "That 70s Show But The Early Seasons, Not Later When Eric Left And Everyone Still Hung Out At His House For Some Reason"
dear, America was founded to be about freedom from liberal govt. If you think liberals want freedom from central govt please give us your best example or admit you lack the IQ to be here with your silence or attempts to change the subject.
Welcome to your ABC's
Republican campaign strategists may lie, but the numbers don’t. Government spending, when adjusted for inflation, has increased during his administration (to date) by 1.4%. Under George W. Bush, the increases were 7.3% (first term) and 8.1% (second term). Bill Clinton, in his two terms, comes in at 3.2% and 3.9%. George H. W. Bush increased government spending by 5.4%, while Ronald Reagan added 8.7% and 4.9% in his two terms.
Not only does Obama turn out to be the most thrifty president in recent memory, but the evidence shows that Republican administrations consistently increased government spending significantly more than any Democratic administration. Go figure.
That is a total crock of shit, statistics lie and liars use statistics. The national debt when he took office was 10 trillion, it took 43 presidents more than 200 years to run that up, your dear leader is on pace to double that in 8 years, so it is ludicrous to say he's spending less.
the subject of where "freedom" falls on the political spectrum does not rise above funny picture status.
dear, America was founded to be about freedom from liberal govt. If you think liberals want freedom from central govt please give us your best example or admit you lack the IQ to be here.
Welcome to your ABC's
Political persuasions of other prominent elected officials
Scott Walker: "Happiness"
Steve King: "Purple"
Elizabeth Warren: "That 70s Show But The Early Seasons, Not Later When Eric Left And Everyone Still Hung Out At His House For Some Reason"
dear, America was founded to be about freedom from liberal govt. If you think liberals want freedom from central govt please give us your best example or admit you lack the IQ to be here with your silence or attempts to change the subject.
Welcome to your ABC's
That is a total crock of shit, statistics lie and liars use statistics. The national debt when he took office was 10 trillion, it took 43 presidents more than 200 years to run that up, your dear leader is on pace to double that in 8 years, so it is ludicrous to say he's spending less.
Clinton's last F/Y budget
US debt
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
Dubya's last F/T budget
Us debt
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75
Government - Historical Debt Outstanding - Annual 2000 - 2014
NOW give me POLICY Obama passed that created the debt, LIKE Dubya's 2 UNFUNDED (means cutting spending for you low informed types), 2 UNFUNDED wars (in FACT they actually cut funding again before going to Dubya's war of choice), UNFUNDED Medicare expansion, OR A REGULATOR FAILURE AS DUBYA PUSHED HIS 'HOME OWNERSHIP SOCIETY AS US HOUSEHOLD DEBT DOUBLED FROM 2001-2007 BECAUSE DUBYA HAD NO OTHER ECONOMIC ENGINE!!!
PLEASE, PRETTY PLEASE TELL US WHAT O'S BEEN DOING WRONG? lol
![]()
fox news, whirlynutdaily, or their favorite newsmax... what's even funnier they are debating this in the house and the repub-lie-cans are failing big time ... the dems are trying to set a budget and the republicans are fighting it all the way ... using the same thing that he's spending out of control ... while all the figures coming from the CBO are saying and showing he isn'tThe graph is from the Office of Management and Budget ; Congressional Budget Office ...what is your source Einstein ?
That is a total crock of shit, statistics lie and liars use statistics. The national debt when he took office was 10 trillion, it took 43 presidents more than 200 years to run that up, your dear leader is on pace to double that in 8 years, so it is ludicrous to say he's spending less.
i for one would love to see this guys numbers on Obama care... I've seen totally the oppositeyou have nothing to counter what I posted so you have two strategiesdo you have any source any information any link of any kind or are you fascinated by your clever use of "left drone" Einstein ?..... you are just another Blow hard no information right wing laughing stock repeating meme s...Typical far left drone.
Believes the CBO on one thing as it fits their programmed narrative and then ignores the CBO when it goes against their Messiah.
See the irony impaired far left drone (that supports Obama's illegal wars) believes the CBO here, but ignores the CBO when it comes to Obamacare.
Typical far left drone..
change the subject to claims about Obamacare...
and of course the brilliant "left drone" ...you have it going on there Einstein...I am laughing at you....you are struggling....
Just point out that the far left drone uses the CBO in this case, but ignores it when it comes to anything that speaks bad of the messiah.
So did you believe the CBO when it showed that Obamacare was not really going to fix any problems except spend trillions of dollars?
See how the far left drones want it to be a valid source here, but not when it runs up against their programmed narrative. Especially as they support Obama's illegal wars.
So if the CBO is a valid source now then it should be when it says that we sill spend trillions on Obamacare that will not really do any good. Or did the far left drone not understand the word Trillions?
Of Couse you truly do not understand the source that you posted, it just fit the programmed narrative..
I understand that you are a low information no information right wing nut bag repeating meme s no sources no nothing ...