OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
Democrats should run on that slogan in 2016.
'Helping the middle class take their country back'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Democrats should run on that slogan in 2016.
Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.And yet its probably the most used. That's the impressive part of Microsoft. They never had the best product for any application but they were successful in selling it anyway.11m? Jebuz, my version of it was only 2m loc, what have they done to my baby?"Simple" is the key word in that sentence. The last I heard, Windows has 11 million lines of code.
Windows is one of the worst operating systems on the market.
Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.And yet its probably the most used. That's the impressive part of Microsoft. They never had the best product for any application but they were successful in selling it anyway.11m? Jebuz, my version of it was only 2m loc, what have they done to my baby?
Windows is one of the worst operating systems on the market.
Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
Great, that will include his taunt:
I'm always struck by people who think, "well, it must be because I was just so smart." There are a lot of smart people out there. "It must be because I worked harder than everybody else." Let me tell you somethin'. There are a whole lot of hard working people out there.
Obama mocks business owners. Obama equates starting, growing and running a business with working for a business.
Thanks.
Any business owner that says 'they' did it should be mocked. 'They' may have put a platform in place, but 'they' didn't make the success, their employees did.
Really? The employees could all quit, and the employer would replace them all within a couple of weeks and make just as much money.
So who's responsible for the company's success?
Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.And yet its probably the most used. That's the impressive part of Microsoft. They never had the best product for any application but they were successful in selling it anyway.Windows is one of the worst operating systems on the market.
Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
President Obama referred yesterday to the wealthy as "society's lottery winners", as though the only reason they were wealthy is because they got lucky one time. No mention of years of training, hard work, risks, 20-hour workdays, failure, recovery, and eventual success.
It's just more of the same attempt to pretend there's nothing wrong with taking they money and resources from those who earned them.
Private people who do this are called "thieves", and are prosecuted and jailed as they deserve.
Great, that will include his taunt:
I'm always struck by people who think, "well, it must be because I was just so smart." There are a lot of smart people out there. "It must be because I worked harder than everybody else." Let me tell you somethin'. There are a whole lot of hard working people out there.
Obama mocks business owners. Obama equates starting, growing and running a business with working for a business.
Thanks.
Any business owner that says 'they' did it should be mocked. 'They' may have put a platform in place, but 'they' didn't make the success, their employees did.
Really? The employees could all quit, and the employer would replace them all within a couple of weeks and make just as much money.
So who's responsible for the company's success?
Leftists are convinced that business owners and upper management just sit around their country clubs, drinking martinis and playing golf all day. They have no clue whatsoever what those people actually do. The only work they're aware of in a business is the bottom-rung shitwork they and their friends do, so they assume that's all there is.
I definitely have my doubts. One of his profound pearls of wisdom, when discussing how to successfully start and grow a business, was "never hire family". I couldn't believe my eyes. What I'm talking about goes a teeny, tiny bit deeper than that.He knows nothing. He's a 17yr old guy in mom's basement pretending to be something on the internet. That is obvious from his posts.And precisely what does "putting the platform in place" mean to you?Great, that will include his taunt:
I'm always struck by people who think, "well, it must be because I was just so smart." There are a lot of smart people out there. "It must be because I worked harder than everybody else." Let me tell you somethin'. There are a whole lot of hard working people out there.
Obama mocks business owners. Obama equates starting, growing and running a business with working for a business.
Thanks.
Any business owner that says 'they' did it should be mocked. 'They' may have put a platform in place, but 'they' didn't make the success, their employees did.
Please expand on that, for the average business owner. You say you've owned businesses in the past, you should know all about this.
.
Anyone who has ever met a successful businessman knows he has worked his ass off to get there. There might be 100 people in his company. He works harder than any of them. Look at Jeff Bezos, for example.
.
Great, that will include his taunt:
I'm always struck by people who think, "well, it must be because I was just so smart." There are a lot of smart people out there. "It must be because I worked harder than everybody else." Let me tell you somethin'. There are a whole lot of hard working people out there.
Obama mocks business owners. Obama equates starting, growing and running a business with working for a business.
Thanks.
Any business owner that says 'they' did it should be mocked. 'They' may have put a platform in place, but 'they' didn't make the success, their employees did.
Really? The employees could all quit, and the employer would replace them all within a couple of weeks and make just as much money.
So who's responsible for the company's success?
Leftists are convinced that business owners and upper management just sit around their country clubs, drinking martinis and playing golf all day. They have no clue whatsoever what those people actually do. The only work they're aware of in a business is the bottom-rung shitwork they and their friends do, so they assume that's all there is.
you wouldn't know what normal people think, cesspool. stop using your deranged imagination to try to figure it out. you aren't made for 'figuring'.
ROFL.. yeah cause no one in the upper middle class has a home and a 401k that add up to 1m.FYI... millionaires are upper middle class.
No. Upper middle class are nets in the 100k's.
Net. Owning a house that's valued at $1M doesn't make you a millionaire. Spendable cash of $1M or more makes you a millionaire.
What's the difference between business contracts that establish a monopoly and a monopoly? Oh.. yeah there is none.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.And yet its probably the most used. That's the impressive part of Microsoft. They never had the best product for any application but they were successful in selling it anyway.
Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, it's a business contract. You might want to look up the definition of "monopoly", because you clearly don't grasp the concept.
Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.And yet its probably the most used. That's the impressive part of Microsoft. They never had the best product for any application but they were successful in selling it anyway.Windows is one of the worst operating systems on the market.
Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
I proved the definition, you should read it after you take your foot out of your mouth. I never said a monopoly is a business contract you lying piece of shit.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.And yet its probably the most used. That's the impressive part of Microsoft. They never had the best product for any application but they were successful in selling it anyway.
Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, a monopoly is not defined as "having a business contract".
What's the difference between business contracts that establish a monopoly and a monopoly? Oh.. yeah there is none.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, it's a business contract. You might want to look up the definition of "monopoly", because you clearly don't grasp the concept.
Full Definition of MONOPOLY
1 : exclusive ownership through legal privilege, command of supply, or concerted action
2 : exclusive possession or control
3 : a commodity controlled by one party
4 : one that has a monopoly
- Websters
Ayup.. that's a monopoly.
Maybe you can tell me what YOU think a monopoly is so I can see what YOU are talking about.
What's the difference between business contracts that establish a monopoly and a monopoly? Oh.. yeah there is none.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, it's a business contract. You might want to look up the definition of "monopoly", because you clearly don't grasp the concept.
I proved the definition, you should read it after you take your foot out of your mouth. I never said a monopoly is a business contract you lying piece of shit.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.Bill Gates is a marketing genius, not a technical genius.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, a monopoly is not defined as "having a business contract".
Incorrect. A MONOPOLY IS A MONOPOLY NO MATTER HOW IT IS ESTABLISHED.What's the difference between business contracts that establish a monopoly and a monopoly? Oh.. yeah there is none.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, it's a business contract. You might want to look up the definition of "monopoly", because you clearly don't grasp the concept.
Full Definition of MONOPOLY
1 : exclusive ownership through legal privilege, command of supply, or concerted action
2 : exclusive possession or control
3 : a commodity controlled by one party
4 : one that has a monopoly
- Websters
Ayup.. that's a monopoly.
Maybe you can tell me what YOU think a monopoly is so I can see what YOU are talking about.
No business contract has ever established a monopoly, so the distinction is purely imaginary.
Liar. I didn't say they had a monopoly in IBM's business contract. FYI making up complete and utter bull shit lies is not making an argument. It's puking bile and crap out of your mouth.What's the difference between business contracts that establish a monopoly and a monopoly? Oh.. yeah there is none.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Meh... Gates owned a monopoly... it's easy to be a marketing genius when you own a monopoly.
Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, it's a business contract. You might want to look up the definition of "monopoly", because you clearly don't grasp the concept.
Wrong. Business is typically conducted by contract, and being the contracted vendor for a business is not having a monopoly on that entire market. Playing fast and loose with the word by saying, "They had a monopoly on IBM's business by contract" isn't going to change the reality.
Monopoly - A situation in which a single company or group owns all or nearly all of the market for a given type of product or service. By definition, monopoly is characterized by an absence of competition, which often results in high prices and inferior products.
According to a strict academic definition, a monopoly is a market containing a single firm. In such instances where a single firm holds monopoly power, the company will typically be forced to divest its assets. Antimonopoly regulation protects free markets from being dominated by a single entity. (Source: Investopedia)
There is a difference, a big one, between dominating a market and owning it, because being the dominant business in an industry doesn't preclude potential competition and loss of market share. Monopoly does, by definition, which is why it's generally viewed as a bad thing. In this country, pretty much the only way to truly achieve a monopoly is through government collusion.
Incorrect. A MONOPOLY IS A MONOPOLY NO MATTER HOW IT IS ESTABLISHED.What's the difference between business contracts that establish a monopoly and a monopoly? Oh.. yeah there is none.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.Oh, please. "Monopoly". I don't recall the government preventing anyone from competing with him. I don't recall anyone preventing competition. And, in fact, I DO recall him having wannabe competitors who just weren't successful. That's not a "monopoly", nor is it easy. That's just dominating the market.
No, it's a business contract. You might want to look up the definition of "monopoly", because you clearly don't grasp the concept.
Full Definition of MONOPOLY
1 : exclusive ownership through legal privilege, command of supply, or concerted action
2 : exclusive possession or control
3 : a commodity controlled by one party
4 : one that has a monopoly
- Websters
Ayup.. that's a monopoly.
Maybe you can tell me what YOU think a monopoly is so I can see what YOU are talking about.
No business contract has ever established a monopoly, so the distinction is purely imaginary.
What part of monopoly keeps confusing you? What % of the Windows operating system market do you think Microsoft owns? How about word processing, spreadsheets..? They control the office and home computer market. Like it or not they own it. Just as apple owns the apple OS. It's not open, it's a monopoly.Incorrect. A MONOPOLY IS A MONOPOLY NO MATTER HOW IT IS ESTABLISHED.What's the difference between business contracts that establish a monopoly and a monopoly? Oh.. yeah there is none.Not true. He had "contracts" with all IBM PC producers to preload Windows on them. It is a monopoly.
No, it's a business contract. You might want to look up the definition of "monopoly", because you clearly don't grasp the concept.
Full Definition of MONOPOLY
1 : exclusive ownership through legal privilege, command of supply, or concerted action
2 : exclusive possession or control
3 : a commodity controlled by one party
4 : one that has a monopoly
- Websters
Ayup.. that's a monopoly.
Maybe you can tell me what YOU think a monopoly is so I can see what YOU are talking about.
No business contract has ever established a monopoly, so the distinction is purely imaginary.
I'm explaining the historical record to you, not your fantasy where any business has the power to grant another a monopoly.