🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Obama’s Iraq Surrender

How Obama Abandoned Iraq

November 4, 2013 By Arnold Ahlert

al-qaeda-in-iraq-announces-merger-with-notorious-syrian-rebel-group-450x337.jpg


President Obama’s facility for lying has taken center stage once again, as Americans grapple with the reality that they in fact can’t keep their health insurance if they like it. Yet while they remain focused on that debacle, another series of declarations made by the president, namely that al Qaeda was “on the run” and near “defeat,” is looking equally deceitful. Last Friday, Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki met in an effort to deal with what is being characterized as a “bloody resurgence” of al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI). “Unfortunately, al Qaeda has still been active and has grown more active recently,” Obama was forced to admit to reporters.

Active is an understatement. More than 6,000 people have been slaughtered in 2013 alone, according to UN estimates. Eight days ago, a series of nine bombs placed in parked cars were detonated over a half hour period at markets and police checkpoints in Baghdad. The blasts killed at least 42 and wounded more than 100 in mostly Shi’ite neighborhoods. On the same day, 14 people were killed and at least 30 more were wounded when a suicide bomber drove an explosives-laden car into a group of soldiers sealing off a street near the al-Rafidain Bank, where their fellow soldiers were getting paid.

Those attacks and others drove the October death toll to 964, including 855 civilians, 65 policemen and 44 soldiers, marking the highest monthly death toll since 2008. The number of wounded totaled 1,600 including 1,445 civilians, 88 policemen and 67 soldiers. By contrast, only 33 insurgent fighters were killed, and 167 were arrested.

...

“Some of these Al Qaeda networks that are coming in from Syria and that are based in Iraq now really have heavy weapons,” a senior administration official told reporters in a conference call last Wednesday. Sadly, they have a reckless Obama administration to thank for their largesse.

How Obama Abandoned Iraq | FrontPage Magazine
 
Al-Qaeda-linked force captures Fallujah amid rise in violence in Iraq

By Liz Sly, Published: January 3

...

In Fallujah, where Marines fought the bloodiest battle of the Iraq war in 2004, the militants appeared to have the upper hand, underscoring the extent to which the Iraqi security forces have struggled to sustain the gains made by U.S. troops before they withdrew in December 2011.

The upheaval also affirmed the soaring capabilities of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the rebranded version of the al-Qaeda in Iraq organization that was formed a decade ago to confront U.S. troops and expanded into Syria last year while escalating its activities in Iraq. Roughly a third of the 4,486 U.S. troops killed in Iraq died in Anbar trying to defeat al-Qaeda in Iraq, nearly 100 of them in the November 2004 battle for control of Fallujah, the site of America’s bloodiest confrontation since the Vietnam War.

Events Friday suggested the fight may have been in vain.

...

Al-Qaeda force captures Fallujah amid rise in violence in Iraq - The Washington Post
 
Of course the far left will sacrifice anybody and anyone to make sure that Iraq is a failure, they don't care how many people die as long as the far left gets it way.
 
Bush did not want to leave Iraq, Obama did not want to leave Iraq.
Iraq wanted us to leave Iraq and that is the only reason we left.
The Iraq war ends with a sovereign Iraq kicking US out - CSMonitor ... The Iraq war ends with a sovereign Iraq kicking US out - CSMonitor.com
Iraq kicks US troops out of the country Iraq kicks US troops out of the country ? RT USA
Getting kicked out of Iraq - credit where it is really due Daily Kos: Getting kicked out of Iraq - credit where it is really due

So as you can see, if it was left up to the US, we would still be in Iraq...,.... Fortunately is was not left up to the US!
 
Bush did not want to leave Iraq, Obama did not want to leave Iraq.
Iraq wanted us to leave Iraq and that is the only reason we left.
The Iraq war ends with a sovereign Iraq kicking US out - CSMonitor ... The Iraq war ends with a sovereign Iraq kicking US out - CSMonitor.com
Iraq kicks US troops out of the country Iraq kicks US troops out of the country ? RT USA
Getting kicked out of Iraq - credit where it is really due Daily Kos: Getting kicked out of Iraq - credit where it is really due

So as you can see, if it was left up to the US, we would still be in Iraq...,.... Fortunately is was not left up to the US!

Well two of you links are not even close to creditable, especially the far left Daily Kos.
-----
"When the Americans asked for immunity, the Iraqi side answered that it was not possible," al-Maliki told reporters in Baghdad. "The discussions over the number of trainers and the place of training stopped. Now that the issue of immunity was decided and that no immunity to be given, the withdrawal has started."
...snip...

Al-Maliki told reporters he still wants American help in training Iraqi forces to use billions of dollars worth of military equipment that Baghdad is buying from the United States. He did not say if the prospective U.S. trainers would be active-duty troops, and said any immunity deals for them would have to be worked out in the future.

Iraq PM: Immunity issue scuttled US troop deal - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq | NBC News

...snip...

But Mr. Maliki said the only way for any of the remaining 50,000 or so American soldiers to stay beyond 2011 would be for the two nations to negotiate—with the approval of Iraq's Parliament—a new Status of Forces Agreement, or SOFA, similar to the one concluded in 2008.

Iraqi Prime Minister Says U.S. Forces Must Leave On Time - WSJ.com
 
Why the 2003 War Is Not to Blame for Unrest in Iraq
Correcting a false media narrative.
May 6, 2016
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
t1larg.al_.sadr_.jpg


From the perspective of leftists and liberal mainstream media outlets, US foreign policy circa 2003 is to blame for all the instabilities and conflicts in the Middle East and Muslim world.

Intriguingly, this perspective is in alignment with the Islamist philosophy of blaming the US for everything.

However, the leftists’ approach of analyzing the instabilities in other countries is unsophisticated and does not reflect the complexities and realities on the ground. Let’s examine Iraq and the current protests in Baghdad, for example.

Hundreds of followers of the Iraqi Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr stormed into the Iraqi parliament building this week, demanding that its speaker halt the session. The prime minister, Haidar al Abadi, warned that these protests could lead to the state's failure.

The leftists’ take on this is that these uprising are happening because of the 2003 US-Iraq war. However, this is very convenient. It seems that their answer to why there is violence in Iraq or other Muslim countries has always been blaming the US for the 2003 war.

They hardly discuss the underlying reasons for the protests, such as the Iranian regime's role in Iraq. For example, Muqtada al-Sadr, who led the protests and violence, is someone who is trained, financed, and supported by Iran. He studied in the city of Qum, a place where radical Shiite figures are brainwashed, for several years. After these protests, Moqtada al-Sadr also travelled to Iran.

Currently, some of the powerful Iraqi Shiite groups that Iran has close connections with and is investing its resources in are Sadr’s Promised Day Brigade—the successor to the Mahdi Army—the Badr Organization, Asa’ib Ahl al Haqq (League of the Righteous) and Kata’ib Hezbollah (Battalions of Hezbollah).

Iranian leaders have spread the narrative throughout their media that Iran is the savior of Iraq, that Iraq is following in the footsteps of the Islamic Republic’s revolution and that Iran has the obligation to support the Iraqi people for humanitarian reasons.

...

The leftists need to realize that Iran and Islamism are two crucial factors in the ongoing violence and conflict in the region. Blaming the 2003 policies of the US for all Middle Eastern conflicts misleads the population and shows a very unsophisticated and naïve way of examining US foreign policy and the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Muslim world.

Why the 2003 War Is Not to Blame for Unrest in Iraq
 

Forum List

Back
Top