Obama Signs Ten Years Plus Sofa Deal With Afghans - Shows Bush How Iraq Shoulda Been Done.

Kosh 10719856
So Another Obama promise broken!

What promise was that?

I see you still support Obama's illegal wars.

Here is a hint of the far left drones:

Obama has claimed he wants the US troops out by 2016, so why would he sign a 10 year deal if that is what he wanted?

Let us see the propaganda they will use to justify this..
 
The ten year SOFA with Afghanistan was signed yesterday - keeping 10 thousand US troops there through 2024.

No placeholder bullcrap going on there.

It follows the historic first democratic transfer of governmental power in Afghanistan's long war torn history.

Our troops along with those of the ISAF and the vast majority of Afghans made this historic achievement possible.

Politically here in the US how will the SOFA and the transfer of power be mocked and torn apart?

So where is the praise for Obama getting a long term SOFA deal with the new Afghan government?

Why no mention of the BS in your title in the body of the OP, could it be your dear leader had 5 years to negotiate a SOFA in Iraq and couldn't get it done?
 
OKTex 10724717
Why no mention of the BS in your title in the body of the OP, could it be your dear leader had 5 years to negotiate a SOFA in Iraq and couldn't get it done?

What's to mention. Iraq wanted to stick with the Bush withdrawal date. Once Bush confirmed Iraq was ready to go it alone in three years there was no way to convince them that they were not ready. That's why Bush should have negotiated a ten year deal as Obama did in Afghanistan.

You need to explain why Bush could not negotiate those seven extra years if Bush didn't agree that three were enough. Bush is the wimp vs Malikii. Bush stared the war and had five years to get his terms not agree to restrict his successor. But keep defending your wimp Bush. It shows your lack of critical thinking and reasoning ability.
 
OKTex 10724717
Why no mention of the BS in your title in the body of the OP, could it be your dear leader had 5 years to negotiate a SOFA in Iraq and couldn't get it done?

Why do you expect Obama to do something that Bush could not do?
 
OKTex 10724717
Why no mention of the BS in your title in the body of the OP, could it be your dear leader had 5 years to negotiate a SOFA in Iraq and couldn't get it done?

Why do you expect Obama to do something that Bush could not do?

Bush signed a SOFA in 2008, and you dear leader couldn't wait for the negotiated withdrawal so he could pound his chest saying he ended the war. If the SOFA was inadequate and every military leader said it was, it was on your dear leader to fix it, he didn't, and that's on him.
 
OKTex 10724717
Why no mention of the BS in your title in the body of the OP, could it be your dear leader had 5 years to negotiate a SOFA in Iraq and couldn't get it done?

Why do you expect Obama to do something that Bush could not do?

Yes we know that the far left can not admit that Obama was wrong on this. They would much rather see the world burn than admit they were wrong!
 
Kosh 10724871
Yes we know that the far left can not admit that Obama was wrong on this. They would much rather see the world burn than admit they were wrong!

Obama was not wrong. It is unnecessary to admit he was wrong. Your failure to answer the question is one great indicates that a Obama was not wrong.

NF 10724794
Why do you expect Obama to do something that Bush could not do?

OKTex 10724717
Why no mention of the BS in your title in the body of the OP, could it be your dear leader had 5 years to negotiate a SOFA in Iraq and couldn't get it done?

What's to mention? Iraq wanted to stick with the Bush withdrawal date. Once Bush confirmed Iraq was ready to go it alone in three years there was no way to convince them that they were not ready. That's why Bush should have negotiated a ten year deal as Obama did in Afghanistan.

You need to explain why Bush could not negotiate those seven extra years if Bush didn't agree that three were enough. Bush is the wimp vs Malikii. Bush started the war and had five years to get his terms not agree to restrict his successor. But keep defending your wimp Bush. It shows your lack of critical thinking and reasoning ability.

Again Bush was clearly wrong (in RW whacko thinking)'not to stand up to Maliki. Bush was already in the dumpster at 22% approval and he still had 150,000 troops in Iraq to overthrow Maliki and take the Sunni side against the Shiites and put an end to all the 'won the war' lies.

Once Bush handed sovereignty and a timetable for withdrawal in three years to the corrupt Maliki - their was no amount of negotiation or applied pressure that was going to change Bush's end date.

Iraq was certain that they were ready without Foreign troops on their soil to defend themselves from anything and everything because Bush and General Odierno told them they were.

Obama has shown Bush in Afghanistan what Bush should have done in Iraq if Iraqi security was a concern in 2008. Why couldn't Bush get a ten year SOFA like Obama did?

Why do you always try to cover for the idiot Bush anyways.
 
Kosh 10724871
Yes we know that the far left can not admit that Obama was wrong on this. They would much rather see the world burn than admit they were wrong!

Obama was not wrong. It is unnecessary to admit he was wrong. Your failure to answer the question is one great indicates that a Obama was not wrong.

NF 10724794
Why do you expect Obama to do something that Bush could not do?

OKTex 10724717
Why no mention of the BS in your title in the body of the OP, could it be your dear leader had 5 years to negotiate a SOFA in Iraq and couldn't get it done?

What's to mention? Iraq wanted to stick with the Bush withdrawal date. Once Bush confirmed Iraq was ready to go it alone in three years there was no way to convince them that they were not ready. That's why Bush should have negotiated a ten year deal as Obama did in Afghanistan.

You need to explain why Bush could not negotiate those seven extra years if Bush didn't agree that three were enough. Bush is the wimp vs Malikii. Bush started the war and had five years to get his terms not agree to restrict his successor. But keep defending your wimp Bush. It shows your lack of critical thinking and reasoning ability.

Again Bush was clearly wrong (in RW whacko thinking)'not to stand up to Maliki. Bush was already in the dumpster at 22% approval and he still had 150,000 troops in Iraq to overthrow Maliki and take the Sunni side against the Shiites and put an end to all the 'won the war' lies.

Once Bush handed sovereignty and a timetable for withdrawal in three years to the corrupt Maliki - their was no amount of negotiation or applied pressure that was going to change Bush's end date.

Iraq was certain that they were ready without Foreign troops on their soil to defend themselves from anything and everything because Bush and General Odierno told them they were.

Obama has shown Bush in Afghanistan what Bush should have done in Iraq if Iraqi security was a concern in 2008. Why couldn't Bush get a ten year SOFA like Obama did?

Why do you always try to cover for the idiot Bush anyways.

More proof that the far left will push the religious propagandas over fact to protect Obama's illegal wars.

So once again why would Obama sign a 10 year agreement if his goal is to pull all troops out of Afghanistan before he leaves office in 2016?

Also who was president of Iraq at the time of the Obama cut and run?
 
pauli 10719136
just so Globalist Elites can get richer off Pipeline and Drug profits

You've been asked to name those Globalist Elites getting rich off the pipeline and drugs but you haven't come up with any names.

It makes no sense for the ISAF countries to withdraw completely and let the Taliban recover from all the losses they have suffered the past six years.

Bring the Tax Dollars and Soldiers home. Afghanistan is for Afghans. We don't belong there. Period, end of story.
 
Pauli 10726567
Bring the Tax Dollars and Soldiers home. Afghanistan is for Afghans. We don't belong there. Period, end of story.

You've been asked:

"You've been asked to name those Globalist Elites getting rich off the pipeline and drugs but you haven't come up with any names."


I see you don't know.
 
Obama's failure to get a SOFA deal with Iraq has proven to be a huge disaster, and it's not like Obama was not warned by many people that failure to leave a stabilizing force in Iraq could lead to just the kind of mess that we have been dealing with for the last three months.
 
Pauli 10726567
Bring the Tax Dollars and Soldiers home. Afghanistan is for Afghans. We don't belong there. Period, end of story.

You've been asked:

"You've been asked to name those Globalist Elites getting rich off the pipeline and drugs but you haven't come up with any names."


I see you don't know.

Who do you think's getting rich off plundering foreign resources? We know it's not us the Taxpayers. Check out what the VP asshole Biden and his little brat son are up to in Ukraine. They're makin a whole lot of cash while raping the American Taxpayers. Only the Globalist Elites benefit from Permanent War. It is what it is.
 
pauli 10768481
Check out what the VP asshole Biden and his little brat son are up to in Ukraine.

Have you given up on your Afghanistan conspiracy theories and moved quickly to Ukraine. What do you think is going on in Ukraine since you failed to produce a credible report on Afghanistan?
 
pauli 10768481
Check out what the VP asshole Biden and his little brat son are up to in Ukraine.

Have you given up on your Afghanistan conspiracy theories and moved quickly to Ukraine. What do you think is going on in Ukraine since you failed to produce a credible report on Afghanistan?

Read up on it yourself. Biden and his brat are getting filthy rich in Ukraine. All while demanding American Taxpayers send more cash and weapons there. So who's gonna benefit most in Ukraine? The Globalist Elites like Biden and his brat. Average American Taxpayers won't benefit at all. The same is so in Afghanistan and all other Wars the Elites are pushing.
 
mikeg 10767118
Obama's failure to get a SOFA deal with Iraq has proven to be a huge disaster,

Why was it Obama's failure to get a SOFA deal with Iraq? Obama had no authority or influence to change minds of Iraq's parliamentarians or Ayatollah Sistani or Muqtada al Sadr or Maliki who all opposed granting US troops immunity from Iraq's courts.

Obama offered to extend the terms of the Bush SOFA but it was the Iraqis that wanted to get rid of immunity. No one warned Obama that failure to leave troops would create such a disaster that warranted stationing troops in Iraq without immunity.
 
Last edited:
Kosh 10725310
So once again why would Obama sign a 10 year agreement if his goal is to pull all troops out of Afghanistan before he leaves office in 2016?

Where's Obama's quote that his goal is to pull all troops out of Afghanistan before he leaves office in 2016?
 

Forum List

Back
Top