i look at it this way, everyone saying GMOs are safe have degrees in science, everyone saying they are dangerous have degrees in acting.
The fact that it's you looking at it gives us our first clue. Anyone who actually bothered to read the background, some already linked here, can see "everyone saying GMOs are safe" are products of the revolving door that thinks the people we select to run USDA should be execs of Monsanto and the like, because that way we know there can be no conflict of interest, ever. Just as those running the economy should come from Goldman Sachs; those running energy policy should come from Exxon, etc. What could possibly go wrong with that? Duh. And those saying they are dangerous are citing scientific studies, also some of which were linked here, which have led to the extreme caution also linked here everywhere in the world but here. Those selectively ignoring all this have degrees in ignorance.
Then there's the label laws. And there ain't no way around that.
But go on witcher bad self, corporate sycophant. Everybody else in the world is wrong and our sterling corporats are right. We're not paranoid; they really are all out to get us.
None so blind...
I did not say that everyone says that GMOs are safe, I pointed out that no one who says that they are not safe are actual scientists who understand the issues. Since you did not bother to cite any actual scientists I have to assume you agree with me, even if all you can do is blather about other things.
Those documents are everywhere including in this thread including in my posts. I can only lead the horse to water; your insistence that the water is not there isn't my concern. That's exactly why I ended the previous post with the words "none so blind". Think about it.