Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In Russia, when people talk about the support of Stalin, understand and know the crimes of Stalin, but people remember that Stalin did good for the country. In America and the world of Stalin's achievements are considered negative and it's natural. What's good for Russia - is bad for the United States.
I had a mammogram in the same room where Patton died in.
General Patton's Hospital Room Heidelberg Germany
So, you had a tits checkup in the room where Patton went tits up.
From wiki answers; " his policies of rapid industrialization did make Russia the second largest economy in 1955"
oh my, obama is pissing of his german allies.
oh my, obama is pissing of his german allies.
you mean he wouldn't draw the same crowd today that he did a year ago in Berlin?
oh my, obama is pissing of his german allies.
you mean he wouldn't draw the same crowd today that he did a year ago in Berlin?
actually it was just a dry comment about shifting alliances and pearl-clutching talking points.
nevertheless, i think obama would of course not draw as big a crowd as in 2008 as a candidate. the novelty has worn off by now. but he could visit berlin and other big german cities and be welcomed warmly without huge crowds demonstrating against him. and that is a huge difference to the fucktard who was in the white house before obama.
you mean he wouldn't draw the same crowd today that he did a year ago in Berlin?
actually it was just a dry comment about shifting alliances and pearl-clutching talking points.
nevertheless, i think obama would of course not draw as big a crowd as in 2008 as a candidate. the novelty has worn off by now. but he could visit berlin and other big german cities and be welcomed warmly without huge crowds demonstrating against him. and that is a huge difference to the fucktard who was in the white house before obama.
thats odd, considering he's still fighting the same wars Bush did.
you mean he wouldn't draw the same crowd today that he did a year ago in Berlin?
actually it was just a dry comment about shifting alliances and pearl-clutching talking points.
nevertheless, i think obama would of course not draw as big a crowd as in 2008 as a candidate. the novelty has worn off by now. but he could visit berlin and other big german cities and be welcomed warmly without huge crowds demonstrating against him. and that is a huge difference to the fucktard who was in the white house before obama.
thats odd, considering he's still fighting the same wars Bush did.
..No other American president has required comparable measures. In 1963, when John F. Kennedy spoke in front of the Schöneberg City Hall in West Berlin, he was cheered by an enthusiastic audience and then openly mixed with the crowd. During his last official visit to Berlin, decades later, then-President Bill Clinton made a surprise stop at a Berlin restaurant in the company of Chancellor Schröder and a few bodyguards.
The hysteria accompanying the current presidential visit has far more to do with the way Bush and his security advisors view the German population than with any rational estimation of danger. They know that Bush and his policies are deeply hated, and respond by treating the German population as if it were a fertile breeding ground for Al Qaida. Their attitude borders on paranoia.
If illusions remain that Bushs foreign policy has to do with the fight against tyranny and the spread of democracy and freedom, the circumstances surrounding his visit to Germany should provide the antidote. Such security measures have always been associated with autocrats who are profoundly aware of the depth of the popular hatred they arouse. ..
actually it was just a dry comment about shifting alliances and pearl-clutching talking points.
nevertheless, i think obama would of course not draw as big a crowd as in 2008 as a candidate. the novelty has worn off by now. but he could visit berlin and other big german cities and be welcomed warmly without huge crowds demonstrating against him. and that is a huge difference to the fucktard who was in the white house before obama.
thats odd, considering he's still fighting the same wars Bush did.
yeah, but we did not forget who is responsible for the IRAQ war, afghanistan is different. that is why there are german troops in afghanistan.
obama's whole approach to his allies is different, too.
blast from the past
..No other American president has required comparable measures. In 1963, when John F. Kennedy spoke in front of the Schöneberg City Hall in West Berlin, he was cheered by an enthusiastic audience and then openly mixed with the crowd. During his last official visit to Berlin, decades later, then-President Bill Clinton made a surprise stop at a Berlin restaurant in the company of Chancellor Schröder and a few bodyguards.
The hysteria accompanying the current presidential visit has far more to do with the way Bush and his security advisors view the German population than with any rational estimation of danger. They know that Bush and his policies are deeply hated, and respond by treating the German population as if it were a fertile breeding ground for Al Qaida. Their attitude borders on paranoia.
If illusions remain that Bushs foreign policy has to do with the fight against tyranny and the spread of democracy and freedom, the circumstances surrounding his visit to Germany should provide the antidote. Such security measures have always been associated with autocrats who are profoundly aware of the depth of the popular hatred they arouse. ..
But what do the Russian people consider "good" about Stalin compared to what they think was "bad"
