Obama Troubled Over Execution!!

[DriftingSand]

The convicted killer being executed was black? Obama is starting to be Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton combined on his best day.

You're not too far from the truth. Obama started out as a rabble-rouser -- oops -- I mean "community organizer" just like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Fortunately for him, George Soros discovered him and bought his Presidency.

Its a real shame that some rw's never bothered to educate themselves as to what a "community organizer" really is because we need a lot more of them.

And, because some rw's have no clue what a community organizer is or does, that comment will be met with much whining and gnashing of teeth.

The dumbing down of the right continues ...

I agree that we need a lot more "community organizers" -- of the rightwing variety.

We have more than enough leftwing rabble-rousers.

 

[Rozman]

This crime was so horrific I can't believe anyone would defend his sorry ass.

 

[DriftingSand]

This crime was so horrific I can't believe anyone would defend his sorry ass.

Goes to show that there are a few loose screws and short-circuited wires in the inner workings of the leftist mind. A general imbalance, as it were.

 

[blackhawk]

Sad so few seem to be troubled over what the victim of the crime had go through.

 

[DriftingSand]

Sad so few seem to be troubled over what the victim of the crime had go through.

She's insignificant white-trash.

 

[Unkotare]

There is evidence of racial bias when it comes to the death penalty. Like it or not.

The same people who make that claim can say the same about every other form of punishment in our justice system. If that is the basis upon which the death penalty is deemed illegitimate, then it follows that every and any form of law enforcement and subsequent punishment is illegitimate.


Enjoy your imagined anarchy.

 

[Intolerant]

The population of the US is 72.5 percent white. And most everything is directed to please you, yet you get pushed out of shape if the President mentions minority issues. You are so disgusting.

Obama is an ethnic joke

Wasn't his communist mama a coal-burner?

 

[rightwinger]

Why would anyone support cruel and unusual punishment?

Is the second amendment the only part of the Constitution you care about?

What part of the Constitution protects murderous animals from receiving their just reward? The death penalty! A rapist/murderer has announced to the world that human life means nothing to him. Therefore, he announces to the world that his own life means nothing to him.

Wow......its true

You guys don't support the Constitution

 

[Rozman]

Do I really care what Obama is "troubled" by? Nope! I don't give two hoots at this point what bothers that lackey so his opinion doesn't mean squat.

He's boo-hooin' over the "botched" execution of a son-like man who beat, repeatedly raped, tortured, and shot a young, innocent, helpless young lady then buried her while she was still alive. Do I really care that his execution took a little longer than usual? No-sir-ee-bob!

Obama turns around and says that America's death penalty is "racially biased." What? This dude committed a heinous crime like a wild animal lacking a conscience. Justice was served. PERIOD!

Obama said the death penalty is warranted in some cases, specifically mentioning mass murder and child murder, and said Lockett's crimes were "heinous." But he said the death penalty's application in the United States is problematic, with evidence of racial bias and eventual exoneration of some death row inmates.

Obama troubled by botched Oklahoma execution - Politics news

There is evidence of racial bias when it comes to the death penalty. Like it or not.

How so?...

You seem to agree with Obama...Can you explain?

 

[mudwhistle]

There is evidence of racial bias when it comes to the death penalty. Like it or not.

The same people who make that claim can say the same about every other form of punishment in our justice system. If that is the basis upon which the death penalty is deemed illegitimate, then it follows that every and any form of law enforcement and subsequent punishment is illegitimate.


Enjoy your imagined anarchy.

Democrats usually protest what works.......

 

[mudwhistle]

Do I really care what Obama is "troubled" by? Nope! I don't give two hoots at this point what bothers that lackey so his opinion doesn't mean squat.

He's boo-hooin' over the "botched" execution of a son-like man who beat, repeatedly raped, tortured, and shot a young, innocent, helpless young lady then buried her while she was still alive. Do I really care that his execution took a little longer than usual? No-sir-ee-bob!

Obama turns around and says that America's death penalty is "racially biased." What? This dude committed a heinous crime like a wild animal lacking a conscience. Justice was served. PERIOD!

Obama said the death penalty is warranted in some cases, specifically mentioning mass murder and child murder, and said Lockett's crimes were "heinous." But he said the death penalty's application in the United States is problematic, with evidence of racial bias and eventual exoneration of some death row inmates.

Obama troubled by botched Oklahoma execution - Politics news

There is evidence of racial bias when it comes to the death penalty. Like it or not.

It took 10 years for this guy to come under the needle.

How long did they take to kill Timothy McVeigh??

6 years.

I think there was racial bias in his execution.......should have been at least 10.

Journalists are worried about the feelings of this scumbag, but McVeigh was the worst person on Earth to them.

Yet another example of racial bias.



The only reason, I repeat, only reason, you claim this is about race is because the perp was black. You can do what you will to an evil white guy, but blacks receive another level of concern from the left. Plain and simple.

 

[RoadVirus]

Why would anyone support cruel and unusual punishment?

Why would anyone want a sick son of a bitch to live?

 

[rightwinger]

Why would anyone support cruel and unusual punishment?

Why would anyone want a sick son of a bitch to live?

Do you understand the concept of cruel and unusual punishment or did you stop at the right to bear arms shall not be abridged?

 

[Godboy]

Why would anyone support cruel and unusual punishment?

Why would anyone want a sick son of a bitch to live?

Do you understand the concept of cruel and unusual punishment or did you stop at the right to bear arms shall not be abridged?

It cant be considered punishment if it wasn't planned, therefore it cant be considered cruel and unusual punishment. Accidents will always happen. Thats part of life. If you want a more perfect system, go back to using the guillotine. Cutting a persons head off might be gory, but it gets the job done every time. No one ever writhes in pain for 40 minutes after losing their head.

 

[Rozman]

Sometimes bad shit happens.
The timing on this one was perfect.

 

[rightwinger]

Why would anyone want a sick son of a bitch to live?

Do you understand the concept of cruel and unusual punishment or did you stop at the right to bear arms shall not be abridged?

It cant be considered punishment if it wasn't planned, therefore it cant be considered cruel and unusual punishment. Accidents will always happen. Thats part of life. If you want a more perfect system, go back to using the guillotine. Cutting a persons head off might be gory, but it gets the job done every time. No one ever writhes in pain for 40 minutes after losing their head.

It was cruel and it was unusual

Obamas point was, we need to make sure that it doesn't happen again

I would like to see a jury forced to sentence chop someone's head off rather than "put them to sleep"

They would be less likely to pull the trigger

 

[DriftingSand]

Why would anyone support cruel and unusual punishment?

Why would anyone want a sick son of a bitch to live?

Do you understand the concept of cruel and unusual punishment or did you stop at the right to bear arms shall not be abridged?

Your post makes no sense. You're trying to blend two, completely different concepts.

"Cruel and unusual punishment" would be something like burying a criminal in the ground with only his head above ground then letting rats eat his eyes out over a 3 day period -- no food -- no water -- no mercy.

The second half of your post has to do with the 2nd Amendment except for the fact that you misquoted it. The final word is "infringed" ... not "abridged." Here's what it actually says:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This right was designed to allow America's citizens to arm themselves in case the government went awry. That was the main purpose. The secondary purposes of being armed is for self-protection, hunting, target shooting, and collecting guns as an investment.

 

[rightwinger]

Why would anyone want a sick son of a bitch to live?

Do you understand the concept of cruel and unusual punishment or did you stop at the right to bear arms shall not be abridged?

You post makes no sense. You're trying to blend two, completely different concepts.

"Cruel and unusual punishment" would be something like burying a criminal in the ground with only his head above ground then letting rats eat his eyes out over a 3 day period -- no food -- no water -- no mercy.

The second half of your post has to do with the 2nd Amendment except for the fact that you misquoted it. The final word is "infringed" ... not "abridged." Here's what it actually says:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This right was designed to allow America's citizens to arm themselves in case the government went awry. That was the main purpose. The secondary purposes of being armed is for self-protection, hunting, target shooting, and collecting guns as an investment.

Nothing short of having rats eat your face doesn't meet your threshold of cruel and unusual?

 

[DriftingSand]

Do you understand the concept of cruel and unusual punishment or did you stop at the right to bear arms shall not be abridged?

You post makes no sense. You're trying to blend two, completely different concepts.

"Cruel and unusual punishment" would be something like burying a criminal in the ground with only his head above ground then letting rats eat his eyes out over a 3 day period -- no food -- no water -- no mercy.

The second half of your post has to do with the 2nd Amendment except for the fact that you misquoted it. The final word is "infringed" ... not "abridged." Here's what it actually says:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This right was designed to allow America's citizens to arm themselves in case the government went awry. That was the main purpose. The secondary purposes of being armed is for self-protection, hunting, target shooting, and collecting guns as an investment.

Nothing short of having rats eat your face doesn't meet your threshold of cruel and unusual?

Read my post again: "... would be something like ..."

It would be planned by the executioner and the courts. The cruelty would be purposeful. In the case of the animal who was recently put to death the plan was to end his life peacefully and humanely. A mistake occurred. Nevertheless ... in the words of Hillary Clinton: "what difference does it make?"

 

[rightwinger]

You post makes no sense. You're trying to blend two, completely different concepts.

"Cruel and unusual punishment" would be something like burying a criminal in the ground with only his head above ground then letting rats eat his eyes out over a 3 day period -- no food -- no water -- no mercy.

The second half of your post has to do with the 2nd Amendment except for the fact that you misquoted it. The final word is "infringed" ... not "abridged." Here's what it actually says:

This right was designed to allow America's citizens to arm themselves in case the government went awry. That was the main purpose. The secondary purposes of being armed is for self-protection, hunting, target shooting, and collecting guns as an investment.

Nothing short of having rats eat your face doesn't meet your threshold of cruel and unusual?

Read my post again: "... would be something like ..."

It would be planned by the executioner and the courts. The cruelty would be purposeful. In the case of the animal who was recently put to death the plan was to end his life peacefully and humanely. A mistake occurred. Nevertheless ... in the words of Hillary Clinton: "what difference does it make?"

Purposeful?

The point is that the execution WAS cruel and unusual. We need to make steps to ensure it never happens again