🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Obama Vows To Veto GOP Legislation To Strengthen Syrian Refugee Screenings

The bill would effectively prevent acceptance of the refugees. It's the same tactic used to shut down almost all the abortion clinics in Texas.

Who gives a shit? I know I don't.

It is a good tactic. If we can't vet them then they shouldn't be allowed into this country.

Even Obama's own people says we can't assure they are not terrorist so why is Hussein so hell bent on bringing the Muslim into this country? It is not the right thing to do just like it is not the right thing to do to kill children at an abortion clinic since you want to use that example.

FBI Director Admits US Can’t Vet All Syrian Refugees For Terror Ties [VIDEO]

FBI Director Admits US Can’t Vet All Syrian Refugees For Terror Ties [VIDEO]

FBI director James Comey said during a House Committee on Homeland Security hearing on Wednesday that the federal government does not have the ability to conduct thorough background checks on all of the 10,000 Syrian refugees that the Obama administration says will be allowed to come to the U.S.

“We can only query against that which we have collected,” Comey said in response to a line of questioning from Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson .

“And so if someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interest reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home, but there will be nothing show up because we have no record of them.”
 
Obama%2527s%2BScreening%2BForm%2B-%2Bonly%2B%25241%2Bbillion%2Bto%2Bdevelop.jpg
 

An exclusive report by Breitbart is also known as a lie.

Do you know what the word "confirmed" means?


Sure. I'm just not sure you or Breitbart does. They weren't caught trying to sneak in. They presented themselves at a defined border crossing.

Breitbart's article doesn't say they were trying to "sneak" in. That's a lie you told!


It strongly implied they were doing something wrong to cross the border.

Attempting to illegally enter the United States, yea I'd call that doing something wrong. Oh and thanks for admitting you lied.
 

Your second link (Houston Chronicle) points out that they weren't caught. The family presented them selves at a point of entry to legally enter the country just like thousands of others do every day

The Chronicle is as left leaning as a newspaper can get.

Since 68 they have endorsed one democrat for president.

Why so selective? Try reading the liberal paper.
 

Your second link (Houston Chronicle) points out that they weren't caught. The family presented them selves at a point of entry to legally enter the country just like thousands of others do every day

The Chronicle is as left leaning as a newspaper can get.

Since 68 they have endorsed one democrat for president.

Why so selective? Try reading the liberal paper.

For the most part it's the only daily paper in the city
 
No question, he'll veto it and Hillary will support it. The media will back her up and praise her for her compassion. Same old shit.


That's because the hateful people who don't want to help the refugees are just a small group who are losing more power every day. America is a compassionate country even if right wingers aren't.
Bullshit. If Republicans wanted them to come in and Obama didn't, you would be bitching about them coming in. You're not compassionate, you're just stupid.


Is that the consensus of you and the voices in your head?
No, it's your history, Puddles.
 

Your second link (Houston Chronicle) points out that they weren't caught. The family presented them selves at a point of entry to legally enter the country just like thousands of others do every day

The Chronicle is as left leaning as a newspaper can get.

Since 68 they have endorsed one democrat for president.

Why so selective? Try reading the liberal paper.

For the most part it's the only daily paper in the city

It is now, but hasn't always been that way. But why start at 1968? Why not include Roosevelt' s four endorsements or Johnson's?
 

Your second link (Houston Chronicle) points out that they weren't caught. The family presented them selves at a point of entry to legally enter the country just like thousands of others do every day

The Chronicle is as left leaning as a newspaper can get.

Since 68 they have endorsed one democrat for president.

Why so selective? Try reading the liberal paper.

For the most part it's the only daily paper in the city

Back when there was a Houston Post the Chronicle was conservative and the Post was liberal.
The Chronicle put the post out of business and then promptly took a hard left.
At this point they are struggling to stay afloat.
Which isnt really surprising with the advent of the internet,but the flat out lies they publish isnt helping either.
I've been a Chronicle subscriber for around 35 years and I'm about to cancel because of the outright lies that are printed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top