emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
dog bites man story. (-:
More like
"Bad healthcare law bites liberal"
More like a pitbull the owners claim to be safe and friendly,
bites everyone, including the people who objected the loudest,
and didn't want it around in the first place.
And both sides cite online references, back and forth (ad nauseum),
to pitbulls being safe or pitbulls being dangerous,
claiming the other side is "posting lies" and listening to propaganda and misinformation.
Just as annoying, regardless which side you are on.
None of this solves the problem.
If people don't agree if a pitbull is safe or dangerous,
then keep it out of the neighborhood where people
have equally right to feel safe and not imposed upon by threats
they don't believe are "unfounded" as the owners claim.
If people in a neighborhood AGREE to keep a pitbull there,
there is no conflict if they all agree to share responsibility for any consequences.
Why can't people respect each other's consent?
If people don't agree on something, why force it on them?